With some bitterness, condo developer John Blankenship declared to the City of Santa Barbara’s Planning Commission that he would not stand before them again. After 37 years in the business, Blankenship said that he was defeated not only by a declining market and the subprime loan crisis, but by a city permitting process that prevented him from profiting on his projects. It is the city’s loss, he added, because for the past couple of years Blankenship Construction has been one of the few still creating condos in the $600,000-$700,000 range — middle-class workforce housing, just like the city said it needs.
Blankenship said he has 29 such units scattered throughout the city that have gone through the entire permitting process but that he cannot afford to build, much less include the solar panels that he promised. He blamed the problem in large part on delays such as the “21 months and three redesigns” that staff had required for his four-unit condo project on San Andres Street, which was the subject before the Planning Commission when Blankenship delivered his speech on the afternoon of January 10. Costly delays; plus the $140,000 he had to spend on “sound studies, biological studies, archaeology and geology studies.” Blankenship particularly resented the fact that Councilmember Helene Schneider, on a “Touring with the Candidates” video during her recent campaign for re-election, posed in front of one of another Blankenship’s projects (though it wasn’t identified as such), a seven-unit complex at 1822 San Pascual,Street, the only workforce condos then under construction in the entire city. She said, “This is what we don’t need in Santa Barbara.”
Some of the project's neighbors were on hand to object to Blankenship's project at 1236 San Andres Street, adjacent to Bohnett Park, where four smallish condos would replace two 1920s redwood-framed craftsman bungalows. Immediately after the seven commissioners voted unanimously to approve Blankenship's plans, he walked over to where the neighbors were sitting and said, "I’m not going to build it,” in a tone that was more accusatory than reassuring.
“It used to be worth it. An entitled property used to be worth money” - Hazel Blankenship
Just to be sure, the neighbors will now appeal to the City Council, though Blankenship and his wife, Hazel, continued to insist that they will not build, especially in light of the glut of low-end condos on the market in Santa Barbara: Currently 184 are comparable to those built by Blankenship. A few years ago these units were fetching up to $700,000; now they are going for $450,000. While city processes are not to blame for the slowdown in the housing market, said Hazel Blankenship, they are to blame for driving up such developer expenses as payment of the interest on the land loan to buy the property while waiting for the project to get approved. “It used to be worth it. An entitled property used to be worth money,” she said. In fact, the couple used to sell the properties after taking projects through the city process, as often as they would erect the building themselves.
Most of the buyers for their $600,000 condos were subprime borrowers, and although the last count shows a mere 41 homes in foreclosure in the City of Santa Barbara, compared to 450 in the Santa Maria and Lompoc area, the banks have stopped making those kinds of loans. Consequently nobody, said Hazel Blankenship, including herself and her husband, “has the nerve to try to build.”
Of course, not everybody mourns the fact that it is now a buyer’s housing market in Santa Barbara, following years of escalating prices. As for Schneider, she stood by her opposition to the seven-unit San Pascual project, which she criticized for its lack of internal gardens or other outdoor space, except for the driveways. “I don’t believe in cramming as many people as possible into as small a space as possible,” Schneider said.
It remains to be seen whether reduced housing prices will alleviate the disappearance of gardens, lead to an even more severe dearth of workforce housing, or both.
This story has been corrected to accurately state the purpose of the Planning Commission agenda item.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
"Most of the buyers for their $600,000 condos were subprime borrowers" - was that an opinion, or a statement of fact based on evidence?
Steve_Johnson (anonymous profile)
January 17, 2008 at 9:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
John Blankenship is either a fool or con man. $600,000 condos are not middle class housing. How stupid. I hope he losses everything. A condo like this takes >$200,000 income.
He belongs in the same hole with realtors, mortgage brokers and everyone involved with real estate.
txengr (anonymous profile)
January 17, 2008 at 3:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You all are haters and fools.
Blankenship was one of the best builders in town. He cared about this city and he used local sub-contractors.
unlike most who use subs from out of town for a lower price and sub quality workmanship.
If schnider ever had to make an honest living she would be singing a different story.
halffull (anonymous profile)
January 17, 2008 at 6:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Santa Barbara's permitting process is what has made the condos he built worth $600,000 - 700,000 in the first place - it's there to keep the quality of architecture up to par...if neighbors are opposing a project, then it should be mediated and redesigned...although the neighborhood considerations should be part of the initial design process, so really the redesign fees are his own fault...so stop complaining, it's part of the business...
and does someone really think that a middle class person can afford a 600,000 condo on a middle class salary?? i certainly can't...
20something (anonymous profile)
January 18, 2008 at 10:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
A $600K condo can be bought with 20% down ($120K) and a $480K loan. You can get a 7-year interest only loan at 6%, which will result in a $2400/mo mortgage payment. Add $500/month for taxes and $200 for the condo association fee plus home insurance. So the monthly cost is around $3100.
You need a monthly income of at least 3 times that (and that is stretching; 4 times is safer), but it can be done. So the family income needs to be around $110K per year. That would be a plumber and a teacher; sounds middle class to me.
But you do need the $120K down payment; it helps to have supportive parents.
Steve_Johnson (anonymous profile)
January 19, 2008 at 7:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Seems no one read what Mr Blankenship said or what he ment to say. He is a gentlemen,and in business to make money. HOW MANY TIMES DID HE HAVE TO GO BEFORE THE PLANNING/POLL BOARD ? HOW MANY RE-DESIGNS AND PLAYING WITH THE POLLS DID HE HAVE TO DO ? I hope he boarded up his properties or what ever bank owns them does asap. The economic and social terrorist (guess workers or whatever you want to call them ) THEY WILL MOVE IN, Happened down the street from me and at least 25 people+ are now living in 3 shifts in a 'middle class' home. Mr Blankenship and his wife are very smart people they can see a city /town in its decline, as did Mr. F. Parker. They dont want to have to put up with any more of this 'city's' goverment and its permits rules and non-sense, while the mad-hatter and her group are filling their pockets, having tea parties. Maybe the Blankenship's can help out with some funding for more police ON STATE STREET, KEEP IT OPEN. YOU MAKE STATE ST. CLOSED TO VEHICLES AND IT BECOMES A NO-MANS LAND, THE GANGS' PLAY GROUND OR HAS THIS GROUP OF DO NOTHINGS THAT ARE IN 'city' HALL, WHILE AWARDING EACH OTHER, CHASED THE BLANKENSHIPS AWAY ALSO.
MR AND MRS BLANKENSHIP DONT TURN AND RUN , JOIN WITH OTHER BUSINESS OWNERS THAT ARE FED-UP WITH THE NONSENSE THAT IS GOING ON IN THIS TOWN AND AREA. TAKE A STAND , Now I have heard through the grape vine , APPLE IS 2ND GUESSING ABOUT OPENING UP A STORE HERE BECAUSE OF THE HIGH CRIME RATE , SEEMS SOME ONE AT APPLE LOOKED AT THE TRAFFIC AND THE ACCTUALs (Finance) AND ACTUALs (real people/ crime victims) WHAT THE POLICE & 'city' HALL ARE SAYING AND IT DOES NOT ADD UP ! YOU KNOW WHAT STEVE JOBS AND HIS GROUP WILL TELL THE MAD-HATTER AND HER GROUP TO DO WITH THEIR STICKS , AND IT WONT BE 'LETS DO' LUNCH !
mpluke11 (anonymous profile)
January 21, 2008 at 11:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This story needed much more source attribution in order to be considered credible.
surfergirlsb (anonymous profile)
January 21, 2008 at 12:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The scenario that Steve_Johnson illustrated is exactly how homes get financed in Santa Barbara. He forgot to include the room rented out to help pay the subprime home loan.
DarNel (anonymous profile)
January 21, 2008 at 12:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
John and Hazel are good business people, and love Santa Barbara. I appreciate their fresh, candid viewpoints and it will be a loss to not have them involved anymore in the shaping of SB.
brentles (anonymous profile)
February 8, 2008 at 6:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment