Comments by 14noscams

Previous | Page 3 of 119 | Next

Posted on December 10 at 2:48 p.m.

nuffalready Rothschild is important because he set up the AGW investment scam - sold shares in his Geneva bank. The investors want money, which they get by selling AGW. It's important because it exposes the 'sceptics work for oil companies' meme; Rothschild is Exxon, and it's giving the .1% more bucks to buy up resources like this while seizing other resources for default on loans. These UCSB students don't know they're working for the banksters against the third world. Another Rothschild bought the largest coal mine in Indonesia in recent years. Maurice Strong and the UN are laughing their heads off at these ignorant, naive students.

The New “Water Barons”: Wall Street Mega-Banks are Buying up the World’s Water

On Climate Change Talks Drag On in Lima

Posted on December 8 at 8:48 p.m.

DrDanDavyBrown - sorry you're offended by facts, it's consistent with posting disinfo and ad homs.

On Climate Change Talks Drag On in Lima

Posted on December 8 at 6:15 p.m.

More self-confirmation of DrDan disinfo, dewdly.

On Climate Change Talks Drag On in Lima

Posted on December 8 at 4:30 p.m.

I posted a comment saying Russia and China were the only countries with no Rothschild central bank control, and I just read that Syria is a third.

On Climate Change Talks Drag On in Lima

Posted on December 8 at 4:20 p.m.

It's unfortunate, but as long as they have an energy source, they'll keep developing more cost-efficient renewable energy. They're a great model for the rest of the world - you couldn't ask for higher support for green than in Germany, and it's just not economically feasible on the scale it attempted using current technology. Wind generation isn't doing well, either. Russia has some experiments going based on Tesla's theories, interesting stuff, but we can't advance renewable energy technology without oil in the short term. And we can't do it without the independence and courage and non-conformity of the creative genius that's responsible for current technology; people who aren't acceptable or functional in a society that values only conformity.

On Climate Change Talks Drag On in Lima

Posted on December 8 at 2:50 p.m.

Thanks, madwand, it's important. I read it recently, and I'm glad you though of posting it - I spaced.
Holdren's statement on AGW causing recent cooling through the polar vortex is good, too. When CEI sued and asked him to retract his statement, in a video posted on the White House website, Obama said it was Holdren's personal statement, not made as head of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Go figure.
Milgram did the research that showed that 2/3 of volunteers in an experiment were willing to give other volunteers fatal electric shocks when told to by the 'Authority Figure' researcher doing the experiment. The Stanford Prison Experiment, at SRI, my links in previous comments, did the research showing that volunteers arbitrarily segregated as wardens and prisoners adopted those roles to the extent that it endangered some volunteers physically and emotionally. SRI has been doing CIA mind control research, including developing the MK-Ultra program, for decades.
The results that show that 2/3 of us are sheep who mindlessly respect authority figures even in experiments where they have no real authority has been invaluable in manipulating public perception of AGW. After 24 years of IPCC predictions that have no correlation with climate, censorship and perception manipulation and megatons of disinfo are the only explanations for acceptance of anthropogenic effects on climate as a cover for the UN's fascist asset grab.
UCSB students who listen to KCSB are inundated with disinfo on climate; Democracy Now, Alternet, NPR, Coyote Radio, etc, in addition to the Environmental Justice fraud. Some of the liberal media is biased by funding, but mostly bigotry, IMHO. I work on a show broadcast on KCSB, with all good people who have no reason to listen to the oil billionaire bankers at the 1987 WWC, because they KNOW that AGW 'skeptics' are oil company shills and don't want to know that the UN version of socialism - asset redistribution, is from the poor to the i%.

On Climate Change Talks Drag On in Lima

Posted on December 8 at 1:45 p.m.

Edmond de Rothschild designed the Balfour agreement, funded the foundation of the nation of Israel (that's not the 6-pointed Jewish star on its flag, it's the 5-pointed star on the Rothschild family coat of arms), at the 1987 4th World Wilderness, Conference Rothschild announced he was selling shares in his private Geneva bank to fund the bank, now called the Global Environment Fund, that's financing the green projects necessary for compliance with UN environment policies, and the Rothschild family controls the US federal reserve banks. Russia and China are the only nations not in debt to the Rothschilds.

On Climate Change Talks Drag On in Lima

Posted on December 8 at 11:35 a.m.

forgot the link to John Cook's '97% consensus' pub.

On Climate Change Talks Drag On in Lima

Posted on December 8 at 11:33 a.m.

The published research is a response to polls showing that as knowledge of science increases and the ability to make quantitative decisions, to understand and think in numerical terms, increases, support for AGW decreases. So people with the ability to see the fraud and to act to protect the environment are actively being portrayed as a threat, and ignorance and stupidity are socially desirable characteristics. It's the troll meme we've seen here.
Anyone who reads John Cook's '97% consensus', which starts off throwing out the 66.6% of abstracts that don't mention AGW, and ends up with 41/13944 abstracts in support of AGW, and can understand that it's really a .3% consensus, according to this research, or who knows that satellites showed that CO2 and methane aren't emitted mostly from industrialized nations, is a dangerous enemy, according to this bs. The fact that 'consensus' is an issue at all is a red flag. If everyone in the world believed that water boiled at 79 deg. C, water would still boil at 100 deg. C. Man doesn't control the physical laws that run the earth.

UCSB connection
applied to 'conspiracy theories'
Cook's '97% consensus of scientists in favor of AGW theory'.

On Climate Change Talks Drag On in Lima

Posted on December 8 at 11:31 a.m.

madwand - Agreed, just extrpolating on your media comment, although control of entertainment media is equally important. I really don't know who's more important, Maurice Strong or Edward Bernays, but Strong's and the Committee of 300's association with the Aspen Institute next door to Strong's Baca Ranch makes it moot.
Ownership of wire services is a major factor, and Rothschilds own AP and Reuters and the French wire service I can't remember now. The Rothschild family also owns the Weather Channel and a geoengineering corp.

The 6 corporations who own US media here, although controlling interest in these is isn't mentioned here:

Re Bernays et al: The national institutes of science, SRI, and Yale Law School have published a huge climate disinformation database. The basis of the Yale and SRI research I've read totally ignores reality and makes it blatantly clear that AGW is a psyop promoted by mind control. Climate science, a physical science, is based on absolutes. This B.S. research ignores the fact that government-funded climate is fraudulent, that AGW has no demonstrated validity, and that government agencies alter data to support politics, and that very few scientists support it. Its basis is that the UN-Obama farce is real, and that scientists who don't support it are anti-social dissidents who are aligned with their professions rather than the welfare of the global population and the planet. It extends to statements that bad science should be supported because it's in the best interests of all. This meme has been replicated by the liberal media.


On Climate Change Talks Drag On in Lima

Previous | Page 3 of 119 | Next

event calendar sponsored by: