Page 2 of 287
Posted on October 18 at 7:02 p.m.
well, bill, certain specific sections of the 101 are not technically "freeway" and bikes do get to cycle on those portions.
On Mayor Schneider: Stop Derailing the 101 Widening
Posted on October 18 at 6:58 p.m.
what, geeber, how YOU are the road building "expert", a neophyte posing as a highway engineer. You're bitter over the loss of these archaic left-side things, you're the neanderthal [or, Homo erectus, really] in these design matters.
On Mayor Blasted for Alleged Conflict-of-Interest
Posted on October 18 at 6:51 p.m.
bilwil's a troll changing the entire discussion about these political endorsements of this publication. I read plenty of criticisms of the Indy published here online in a forthright way. While I'm shocked at this incomprehensible No on P endorsement, the issue isn't Welsh or Partridge, it's the Indy's new anti-environment stance.
On Endorsements 2014
Posted on October 18 at 1:24 p.m.
Thank you, Geeber: this video IS terrific! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Nk-MdvO... Yes on P!
On Oil and Water and Measure P
Posted on October 18 at 1:18 p.m.
I've never been a Water Guardian. I've lived and worked here, in SB, since 1966. Yes on P!
On Two Cents and More with Measure P
Posted on October 18 at 1:16 p.m.
so, sensible, the oil-lovers and producers are somehow "us"?! We are not here because of petroleum, get hold of your ego, eh? Oil has been an important part of America's industrial growth, as a fossil fuel its time is waning, try to get used to it. And stop acting like you are "us" - YES on P!
On Thank You, Indy
Posted on October 18 at 12:07 p.m.
Protecting our precious Los Padres National Forest through the creation of more "federal wilderness areas", as Capps has done, IS a good thing, Carnage. Keeping roads and bikers out of these areas is positive, and you fibbed when you wrote her wilderness legislation would keep wilderness areas "closed to hikers,bikers and horseback riders" -- NO, they are closed only to bikers; you are wreaking carnage on the facts. Vote Capps.
On Questions for Capps
Posted on October 18 at 12:03 p.m.
Natty G, 14noscams attacked the "Water Guardians" [October 16, 2014 at 9:49 p.m.] so Tabatha was making it clear she has nothing to do with them, she has never claimed to be one of them, YOU make this specious slander now since you have nothing else. Thanks, Tabatha. Yes on P!
Posted on October 18 at 11:57 a.m.
uh, $288 million, still a ginormous amount of dough.
On Get Specific, Measure S
Posted on October 18 at 9:29 a.m.
Agree JA that it's a howling blunder for the Indy Board to endorse No on P -- any chance we can get a clarification, Indy? Kettmann, who has written some terrific articles about the environment for the Indy, and Welsh, HAD to be Yes on P. Where do you stand Marianne? Give us the gist of your thinking. Anyone else have the honesty to "come out" on this crucial issue for our environment?? Don't your loyal readers deserve such?