Page 1 of 38
Posted on June 16 at 11:15 a.m.
@nativegeo: "I'm one of the most bipartisan bloggers on these threads"
Hahahahahaha! That's a good one. Quick, tell me another!
@nativegeo: "I find the recent surge in bipartisan rants from liberals disingenuous, and just another way of apologizing for Obama's failures."
Hahahahaha! And there it is. It's like you're playing a game of 'I don't read my own posts!' - and the rest of us are winning.
On A Sound Infrastructure Indicates a Sound Country
Posted on June 5 at 6:20 a.m.
@nomoresanity: "And yes, I am old enough to well remember when Ronald Reagan was openly disparaged by Liberals... just for being an actor that used his position to move into politics."
So then you're also old enough to remember a Ronald Reagan that raised taxes 10 times while in office, gave amnesty to 3 million undocumented immigrants, supported background checks on gun sales, and supported an assault weapons ban.
@nomoresanilty: "...not Progressives which had not yet stolen and corrupted the Democratic Party..."
LOL. You're delusional.
On Oil and Water Don’t Mix
Posted on May 27 at 8:16 a.m.
@nomoresanity: "...because JJ can be a jackass from time to time, instead of commenting on the fact that Lois claims to be the Shepard of our Coast and is the Co-Chair of the NMSC, you aim your barbs at JJ instead of the lovely people that are in charge of protecting the coast?"
It's HEE-STERICAL reading all of the comments from the typical cast of clowns who routinely fall over themselves complaining and whining about government regulatory overreach as they now suddenly have the most convenient change of heart EVER in the history of anything. It's amazing the speed at which you suddenly abandon your 'free market solves EVERYTHING' at the drop of a hat and blame Lois Capps because... of, who knows why, you make this stuff up as you go, anyway...
You all must wake up with the worst whiplash...
On Community Demands Transparency in Refugio Spill
Posted on May 20 at 8:30 a.m.
I thought Jarvis might be the source of this latest environmental crisis, but then I realized that it wasn't a SEWAGE spill.
DRILL BABY DRILL! WOO HOO!!
On Big Oil Spill Along Refugio Coast
Posted on May 20 at 8:22 a.m.
Drill! Baby, Drill! High five, everyone! Nice work!
@nomoresanity: "Davy sounds absolutely thrilled that he can use this to further his Progressive agenda. How sad that a lousy event leaves a number of you frothing at the mouth in delight."
Yeah, I bet he's totally thrilled that the climate-denial Luddites have unleashed yet another totally predictable oil spill on our community. No more sanity is right.
@nomoresanity: "It is not even near a catastrophic environmental event."
I'd ask you to describe the level of carnage necessary for you to pull your head out of the sand, but I have a feeling you'd spend your dying breath choking on oil while denying there's a problem.
DRILL BABY DRILL! WOOHOO!
Posted on May 12 at 9:29 a.m.
@nativeson: "...you're stating that the Founders all had their x-boxes and ipads and whatevers handy while they were framing the Bill of Rights?"
Of course, they did - the Founding Fathers kept their 'ipads and whatevers' right next to their high capacity clips and semi-automatic weapons they had while drafting the 2nd Amendment.
@JarvisJarvis: "Singapore solution still looks best for me: illegal dealers face death penalty, swift and sure."
Nice to see that you're simply dispensing with all pretenses that you're not a fascist wack-job. If there's anyone in dire need of a joint and some STFU time, it's you.
@DavyBrown: "Try reading the Constitution some time."
Everyone knows that the Constitution is a liberal conspiracy. I bet you didn't know that the people who wrote the Constitution weren't even born in the United States of America - they were born in some English colony! And do you know where else the English had colonies!!?! AFRICA!
Plus, why bother reading the actual document when you get all your regurgitated talking points from Breitbart or Fox News? So much easier than, ya' know - readin' stuff.
On Shooting in Isla Vista
Posted on April 24 at 10:46 a.m.
@JarvisJarvis: "...instead of from hard work and frugal habits which are far more likely the basis for "right-wing" money. "
People who work hard do not have time to spend countless hours championing policies that keep the service classes in their place. People who work hard don't have time to invest in crazy, right-wing, racist birther conspiracies theories about the President. People who work hard can discern between the made up statistics you continually try to peddle as fact and reality. People who worke hard don't begrudge other hard working people - like teachers and civil servants. In other words, people who work hard don't display the very aspects you continually display.
Your sense of entitlement regarding a society to which there's no evidence you've ever contributed anything is all the proof I need to know that you've never really worked hard. Class envy? More like plain old pity - and I'm sure no one ever accused you of having any class, JarJar...
On The Return of Bill and Hillary?
Posted on April 24 at 8:55 a.m.
@JarvisJarvis: "Don't forget these 'right-wing twits' already made their fortunes a long time ago so now have plenty of leisure time and are willing to pass on their hard-earned wisdom to those less enlightened."
LOL. It's called living off of mommy and daddy while complaining about how lazy everyone else is. Wisdom from the parents' basement...
JarvisJarvis: "It is painful to watch ignorance or one-sided political bias try to control a discussion here..."
Says the person who posts, what, 20+ times per day and floats the same made-up statistics and crazy conspiracy theories with such frequency I'm half-convinced you get paid per trolling comment...
Not to worry, geeber - it's better that they're regulated to the comments section of a website than actually impacting policy. Their party is going to spend the next primary cycle eating each other alive over who is the craziest of the craziest right-winger - while the Democrats, for better or worse, coast to yet another presidential victory - all because the Republican party hasn't figured out that it's not 1950.
And you'll get a front row seat watching their brains ooze out their ears as they seethe with rage blaming everyone but themselves for an irrelevancy of their own making. But hey, better here than in office...
Posted on April 17 at 6:43 a.m.
@nativegeo: "So Satellites can measure sea ice thickness?? "
"Since 1979, satellites have provided a continuous, nearly complete record of Earth’s sea ice. The most valuable data sets come from satellite sensors that observe microwaves emitted by the ice surface because, unlike visible light, the microwave energy radiated by the sea ice surface passes through clouds and can be measured even at night."
@nativegeo: "Arctic sea ice GAINS can be seen on new government map of Canada."
Eh, not so fast there....
'September sea ice hit a record low in 2012 and is projected to decline further. The change means there is far more ice shown on the 2015 version of the map than on its predecessor.
“Both are correct,” Dr. Storie said. “They’ve provided the right notation for the representation, but not many people will read that or understand what it means.”'
I think you fall into the '[not] understand what it means' camp....
On Rescuing Sea Lion Pups
Posted on April 16 at 9:05 a.m.
@BeckyBee: "Jarvis' posts convey most every thing I, and many of my faimly, friends and associates, believe and think."
So I see Jarvis has started yet another account.
@JarvisJarvis: "But a new survey of W-2 data from over half of the public school systems in California found that the state’s average teacher pay and compensation was $84,489 last year. "
Jarvis Lie #1: That figure is not from Forbes, it's from Brietbart. The Forbes article that Brietbart cites, written by well-known hack and climate-change denier Warren Meyer, NEVER CITES THAT FIGURE.
Jarvis Lie #2: Even if that $80k figure is correct, they've not included any indication as to which school districts are included in that calculation. So it's very likely that poorer school districts did not submit there information, thus the average is weighted up (LAUSD is not included, for example).
Keep the trolling comin', Jar-Jarvis.
On School Basics