Comments by Num1UofAn
Page 1 of 29 | Next
Posted on May 16 at 2:01 p.m.
So RobEngolf - saving 2.5 years of construction time is more important than eliminating a known and proven hazard?
And to note - I would say that the people of Montecito (such victims of the terrible terrible world out there) have been pretty fairly chastised.
Posted on May 16 at 1:57 p.m.
This is one battle where I hope Goliath stomps on David's face several times and then moves forward with whatever he wants.
Posted on May 2 at 10:47 a.m.
Nothing brings out the SB NIMBYs like a large crowd and bass.
Posted on April 24 at 3:31 p.m.
OMG GOLETA IS BECOMING OXNARD!!! LOL. Perhaps the most ridiculous overstatment of the year. I wonder when the last time these people have even been to this strip of Hollister? Believe me, this is an improvement.
Posted on April 19 at 4:08 p.m.
Well, there is active silver iodide distribution during certain times of the year over the backcountry for cloud seeding so that could be an option as well.
On Chemtrails:
Posted on April 11 at 6:08 p.m.
One of those "no-brain" hunters here - I haven't used lead for years specifically for the reasons found by this study. Why would I want to eat lead and why would I want to harm the beautiful wilderness I get to experience many times a year? I agree completely with this legislation and I will gladly pay the extra $s for non-lead ammunition. Although, I do think it should be legal to use lead ammunition at shooting ranges.
Posted on April 9 at 2:54 p.m.
I still think the hunters made a stupid choice, but they were probably justified in taking some kind of action (shooting the dog was over the line). That said, I am a hunter and a dog owner and from that perspective I can say that it is really difficult to hunt anywhere near Santa Barbara. I stay completely away from the lower SY area, but most of my hunts end up being long hikes with a gun. As far as the restrictions and access go, hikers have it pretty easy. The article was a good one. The forest could make it much easier on everyone involved to just make the signage more clear.
Posted on April 8 at 3:42 p.m.
Thanks for the article Ray. Are there implications for hunters in this new management plan?
Posted on April 4 at 4:31 p.m.
Wow! So much negatvity. I think it is great that they are restoring some wetlands. Only about 10% of California's costal wetlands remain so this seems like a great project to me. I hope I can volunteer once it is under way.
Page 1 of 29 | Next





Previous Month



Posted on May 23 at 2:42 p.m.
It doesn't sound like the county supervisors were all that helpful.
On Mental Health Services Deemed Disconnected and Dysfunctional