Comments by brimo7272
Posted on December 5 at 9:50 a.m.
@LegendaryYeti...it would be difficult for an untrained person to control and subdue burly/attitudinal drunks by himself, however a trained peace officer should have very little difficulty. Especially since this suspect was not "burly" and I am assuming this officer has received training.
Posted on December 2 at 5:32 p.m.
All this really shows is that Tudor isn't real skilled at controlling a suspect. I guess that's what you get when you hire former basketball players.
Posted on November 17 at 8:50 a.m.
User profile: billclausen
Joined: April 24, 2007
Posted on November 2 at 12:35 p.m.
@Hank or Henry, since you seem to have all the answers or at least an answer for all things, can you help me with this toughie?
If Train A leaves Station A at 80 mph and Train B leaves Station B at 95 mph and the people on Train B are eating lasagne but they run out of garlic bread, what color are the conductors shoes?
Posted on October 27 at 4 p.m.
Thank you SBPD! Thanks for removing these DUI scofflaws off the streets of SB!
And thanks for doing it in a way that will result in us taxpayers having to pay out hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees and settlements!!!
Keep up the good work!!!
Posted on August 4 at 4:28 p.m.
I'm still trying to figure out when the NP was actually relevant? Born and raised here (1969), and I can't recall a "great" News-Press. Just a local rag without any teeth.
Posted on July 7 at 12:53 p.m.
Credibility should have no boundaries when its application involves an officer of the law. Sometimes the avenue to justice takes an odd course...maybe even the arrest of a "journalist" will bring to light the mis-deeds of those who are employed to protect us.
Posted on May 20 at 11:30 a.m.
So the university IS IN its original state? Would improvement occur if it was in its original state? Including "improved" in any statement indicates a level not quite "natural". Hmmmm....
Previous Month
Posted on March 21 at 9:32 a.m.
Agree with Unsub55...the allocation model is broken. We don't need to throw more money at the issue, but instead re-direct funding to affect the overall model. Using the more affluent districts argument when explaining the performance of schools always reverts back to the socioeconomic make-up of those schools. It doesn't substantiate the claim that more money equals greater test scores, it just underscores the differences in the minority demographic.
On El Puente Closing