WEATHER »

Comments by dionysiuspetros

Page 1 of 2 | Next

Posted on May 25 at 6:54 p.m.

With regard to those comments about his parent; he was 22 years old. Although most psychologists and neurologist agree that the human brain is not completely developed until as late as 30 years of age, Elliot was legally responsible for himself; this includes his words and actions. Still, if I were his parents I would have paid more attention to his online persona and upon discovering his posting I would have made his mental health professional aware of the content.
As for the LEOs being fooled by him; judging from his calm demeanor during his Youtube videos I would guess he could easily pull the wool over their eyes.

On Disturbing Details Released in Isla Vista Murders

Posted on August 9 at 12:32 p.m.

For those of you who would immediately become fearful if you saw a person with a fire arm; let’s get something straight:
1. If you can see the fire arm in a holster, the person wearing it is likely a law enforcement officer (LEO) or a law abiding citizen (LAC).
2. If you see the fire arm in the person’s hand being pointed at somebody and that person does not appear to be a LEO or LAC and is behaving in a hostile manner; this is probably a criminal.
3. If you do not see a fire arm, there is no guarantee that the person is not armed. If the person is concealing a fire arm, there are at least the following possibilities:
a. LEO
b. LAC
c. Criminal
If you find yourself in a situation like #1 above, petrified with terror, your fear is irrational.
However, fear is the appropriate response to #2.
Unfortunately the vast majority of the people you see fall into the category of #3. And thought #3 may give you comfort; it is in some cases a false sense of security. Yes, those instances may be few, far between or even never occurring; but not knowing whether an individual is concealing a fire arm ought to bring about some minimal sense of concern. Just because we live in an area where the crime rate is very low does not mean that there is no peril.
Should we all become paranoid because we can’t see if people are packing heat? Absolutely not!
But we should be no more concerned if we see a fire arm in the condition described by #1 above. Why? Because fear of a fire arm in the possession of a LEO or LAC is irrational.

On Strict Stance on Concealed Weapons

Posted on August 9 at 12:13 p.m.

For those of you who would immediately become fearful if you saw a person with a fire arm; let’s get something straight:
1. If you can see the fire arm in a holster the person wearing it is likely a law enforcement officer (LEO) or a law abiding citizen (LAC).
2. If you see the fire arm in the person’s hand being pointed at somebody and that person does not appear to be a LEO or LAC and is behaving in a hostile manner; this is probably a criminal.
3. If you do not see a fire arm, there is no guarantee that the person is not armed. If the person is concealing a fire arm, there are at least the following possibilities:
a. LEO
b. LAC
c. Criminal
If you find yourself in a situation like #1 above, petrified with terror, your fear is irrational.
However, fear is the appropriate response to #2.
Unfortunately the vast majority of the people you see fall into the category of #3. And thought #3 may give you comfort; it is in some cases a false sense of security. Yes, those instances may be few, far between or even never occurring; but not knowing whether an individual is concealing a fire arm ought to bring about some minimal sense of concern. Just because we live in an area where the crime rate is very low does not mean that there is no peril.
Should we all become paranoid because we can’t see if people are packing heat? Absolutely not!
But we should be no more concerned if we see a fire arm in the condition described by #1 above. Why? Because fear of a fire arm in the possession of a LEO or LAC is irrational.

On Do you want to carry a gun?

Posted on March 3 at 9:09 p.m.

Here are some interesting numbers which indicate that gun violence is decreasing. Thus, take a deep cleansing breath and relax.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/...

On <em>The High Cost of Gun Violence</em>

Posted on December 22 at 9:56 a.m.

...OBTW: in none of the incidents referenced (...Columbine, Virginia Tech, Tucson, Arizona, and Aurora, Colorado, couldn’t do, Newtown, Connecticut...) was an AR-15 used.
You were close in Aurora, CO; there was a S&W version of the same weapon.

On Dog Got Your Tongue?

Posted on December 22 at 9:54 a.m.

Nick,
You finally hit the nail on the head; it took a few paragraphs but you got it.
The tragic event in CT was not as much about guns as it was about mental health.
All of the weapons used by Adam were purchased legally. But perhaps his mother did not exercise responsibility in properly securing those weapons.
I would highly recommend that all weapons be locked up by the responsible party to preclude a minor from accessing them; it would seem to me that common sense should also dictate this in a case where there is a mentally unstable person on the premises. If I understand correctly, this is the law here in CA. But, like so many laws, people don't always abide by the law, nor exercise common sense. Still, this is no reason to penalize and/or encumber those who are responsible and law abiding.

On Dog Got Your Tongue?

Posted on August 22 at 9:42 a.m.

Hey Rambler,
What kind of ammo "...drills an endless hole through everything in front of it..."?
Classic knee-jerk nonsense like a pistol grip and shooting from the hip never misses.

On You Too Can Carry a Gun

Posted on April 7 at 3:32 p.m.

The principle known as "priesthood of the believer" clears up this issue. The idea is that once an individual has personally trusted in Jesus Christ for their eternal salvation, he/she is a priest of the one and only God and therefore able to make intercession on behalf of anybody or him/herself.
Still, I think this is a great idea! It reminds me of one progessive lady from Ojai by the name of Emily...

On Women Priests in S.B.

Posted on September 20 at 9:47 p.m.

Binky,
I would say that you should surrender post haste; I believe you have met the epitome of rhetoric.
Aristotle nor Isocrates could hardly begin to consider the depth of this thought process.
Without a doubt there is no better phrase to bring an end to a dialectic discourse than "you suck".

On Locals Only Music Issue, Version 2.0

Posted on September 19 at 10:41 p.m.

Solar power is without a doubt the best thing out there in the long run.
The problem is the the initial cost.
I ran some numbers through a calculator I came across:
http://www.realgoodssolar.com/solar/e...
and plugged in $200/month with SCE in the Bakersfield area at 100% coverage. It estimated that the base price would be $83,000!!
If I could finance it at 6.5% over 30 years it would cost $310/month. This seems to work out to a net cost of $110/month except that once the sun goes down the solar panels don't work very well. So, I would still be buying from SCE at night. If I were able to sell enough electricity back to them perhaps that would balance out. But I don't see how this could pay itself off in less than the time it takes to pay the loan as is indicated by the calculator.
In the end solar power turns out to be only accessible to those affluent enough to not really need to save money.
But of course we're saving the planet so it's for a good cause.

On None

Page 1 of 2 | Next

event calendar sponsored by: