Page 2 of 72
Posted on May 23 at 11:18 a.m.
Is Jarvis an idiot for thinking that no one can see that the context of his repeated remarks about Lois Capps shows that he thinks she should be held accountable for the oil spill? Is Jarvis an idiot for thinking that somehow she should have been able to get the Republican-dominated Congress to investigate this one pipeline? Is Jarvis an idiot for letting his partisan bias convince him that she was in the majority more often than not when 30 seconds spent checking the claim would have shown he was wrong?
Is Jarvis really such an idiot that he thinks he can get away with all of his crap just by repeating it over and over and not really caring whether any of it corresponds to reality?
On Huge Oversight Gap on Refugio Pipeline
Posted on May 23 at 10:55 a.m.
This is the ninth post in this string in which Jarvis has accused Lois Capps of something or other in relation to this pipeline, including the one in which he claimed that she "had the majority green light more often than not prior to 2010," which is true, if 2 is greater the 5, the number of times she actually was in the majority vs. being in the minority.
And of course a few posts above he couldn't help tossing in something completely irrelevant about public service unions, because he's Jarvis, and constantly reminding us that he has opinions is something Jarvis has to do.
Posted on May 23 at 10:13 a.m.
Lois Capps yet again?
Jarvis Syndrome, incurable.
Posted on May 22 at 2:08 p.m.
His nonsense about Obama and Capps exposed, Jarvis responds by repeating some of that nonsense and then posting some information whose relevance he seems to take for granted, even though, with regard to the present topic, it has nothing to add on the question of what can be done to avoid problems caused by irresponsible human behavior.
Posted on May 22 at 1:59 p.m.
So apparently because there are things we can't control, we shouldn't try to control the things we can.
Posted on May 22 at 1:48 p.m.
Jarvis has already been caught lying and speaking nonsense. He either ignores it when someone points this out or simply repeats it. His right to make a fool of himself shouldn't be restricted. It's easy enough to expose him and his unwillingness or inability to let truth or reality get in the way of his politics. No one takes him as anything more than a sad specimen of partisan dementia.
Posted on May 22 at 7:50 a.m.
Caught in yet another clear lie, Jarvis, as usual, can't be bothered to address it directly, because in his world, facts don't matter. Again as usual, his response to having his dishonesty exposed is to spread some additional nonsense.
Lois Capps was the nicest person in Congress, so of course she should have been able to convince the Republican leadership to... what exactly? That they should conduct a special investigation into a pipeline that she should have known was problematic because, in Jarvis' bizarre phrasing, it was supposedly "under her unique control"?
Why does he think anyone takes him as anything other than a joke? Just asking.
Posted on May 22 at 6:43 a.m.
According to Jarvis, Lois Capps "had the majority green light more often than not prior to 2010."
According to reality, Lois Capps was in the minority 5 of 7 times prior to 2010.
Posted on May 21 at 10:24 p.m.
Apparently Jarv believes that Lois Capps, who sits on committees run by Republicans, people opposed in principle to government regulation, should have somehow figured out how to impose more government regulation, for which Jarvis of course would have castigated her.
Jarv also reports, "Barry Soetoro refuses to nominate new head of PHMSA - pipeline safety agency, despite Democratic pleas to do so."
There are often things that children do for no sensible reason other than that they believe it will draw attention to themselves and annoy the grown-ups -- hence Jarv's pleasure in repeating his "Soetoro" idiocy, apparently unaware that all it accomplishes is alert people that anything appearing with the Jarvis name attached is going to be worthless and likely dishonest as well. And sure enough -- the letter to which he refers was written yesterday, so Obama has hardly had time to "refuse" to act on it.
As I've noted before, on reading anything Jarvis writes, it's best to take Mary McCarthy's line to heart, that "every word [he] writes is a lie, including 'and' and 'the'."
Posted on May 20 at 3:18 p.m.
Jarvis calls other people liars, but his own lies and dishonesty clutter the Comment sections. He seems to find his refusal to provide evidence to back up his fraudulent claims a triumphant confirmation of how clever he is.
As I've said before, when reality comes knocking at the door, Jarvis goes scuttling out the window.
On Students Stage Sit-In at Cheadle Hall