Page 1 of 46
Posted on January 25 at 5:04 p.m.
Dear Tanya Golash-Boza
Great point! Thanks for the info... we'll get started on raising deportation efforts and deporting more women and Asians that are here illegally.
That way the %'s will better balance out and not be so unfair.
Legal immigration = goodIllegal immigration = bad
On Mass Deportation Targets Black and Latino Men
Posted on January 25 at 11:16 a.m.
Since when did stating facts become racist?There is not a single iota of any racists statements or racism in my letter above,
Most of the parents and children at Franklin are here illegally.Most of the parents that use the new center for welfare and other services that she started at Franklin are ethnically Latino and here illegally or the children of illegal immigrants.
Where is the racism in saying that? Please explain. And don't tell me your opinion or interpretation of it being racists because that would be not based in fact.
Legal immigration from Mexico is good and welcome my me.Illegal immigration is bad.
I know very very hard for you to understand.
On Cutting the Red Tape
Posted on January 25 at 6:29 a.m.
This article makes me want to barf.
1. Her parents came here illegally. They were lawbreakers.
2. She helped open up a welfare center because illegal immigrants were taking their kids out of school to got get welfare benefits far away from the schools. The fact that people who break the law and then go get benefits funded by taxpayers here legally is shameful but only outdone by making it super easy for them with the new "super-center" right on campus.
3. The reason it is cool now to have a burrito for lunch is that all the kids have burrito's for lunch since there are barely any white kids left at Franklin or Harding - the schools are overrun by broken English illegal immigrants or their kids - who are some of the most intolerant and racist people you've met. A relative of Lois Capp's recently took her white kid out of Harding after years of abuse (not bullying, but racism) by latino kids and their parents.
4. Das and his lib-dem pals help out to get votes from what is turning into a huge block of new voters brought here by their parents (and given amnesty by Obama) or who were born here to illegal alien parents.
It's incredible but true that 1-4 above are celebrated and supported and hoped or by huge numbers of confused politically correct lib-dems and the "it feels go so we should do it" crowd in SB.
Posted on January 25 at 6:15 a.m.
It's axiomatic that when lib-dems like 'spacey', 'Ken_Volok' and 'DrDan' are presented with rational, fact based arguments, they respond with one or more of (1) name-calling/labeling, (2) insults/jokes or (3) change the topic or respond off-point.
DrDan:It's not an "antediluvian Christian view" that drives UN Human Rights or your own personal view about the protection of human rights to life. It's does not require anyone to be Christian to agree that you were both Human and Alive continuously all the way back to conception. All the it requires to be a person is to be Human and Alive at the same time. It's science, so this might be tough for you.
Ken_VolokYes, it's a fantasy that millions of voters elected pro-life position politicians during the recent mid-terms in both the Senate and House. Pure fiction.It's also a fantasy that no one cares about killing living humans during pregnancy, which is why hundreds of laws were proposed in 2014 to restrict this practice with dozens passed successfully. Pure fantasy. You are so right!
The fact is that the lib-dem crowd that purports to care about things like social justice and human rights is 100% comfortable letting women and doctors slaughter millions of living humans. It's just too cool for school for them and all that inconvenience cased by NOT killing all those lives is such a drag. Much better to raise everyone's standard of living via death and the destruction of life.
What a terrible worldview I have - respect for the lives of innocent living humans regardless of age or where they happen to be.
On New President for Planned Parenthood
Posted on January 24 at 12:28 p.m.
Ken_volok: champion of fairness, social justice, equal rights, progressive tax policy, human rights, anti-death penalty, anti-war, anti-gun - all in the name of creating a more just and fair and safe society with less misery, death and distraction - except for the millions of (vast majority) living humans of color (African American and Latino) being vacuumed, chemically burned, injected with lethal poison, dismembered, cut and partially born.
All that is A-OK with you and "no one cares".
People should and do care. Millions. It's why laws restricting this barbarian practice of death penalty for unborn living humans are rolling out across the country.
Posted on January 24 at 12:21 p.m.
That's right "spacey"...Unless you are the actual victim of a gunshot wound you cannot talk about or support gun control laws or even laws against murder.
In the case above, all you have to be is a living human inside a woman who believes you will be inconvenient to her and you're a worthless blob, seed, organ, globule and all the other things you and yours call unborn humans right up until birth - or at least 24 weeks.
And the celebrations and verbal, written and actual back slapping congratulations and agreement you all get with each other over this awesome point of view --- while you fight for bigger chicken cages or nod heads in agreement about going veg to save animals from suffering.
Truly inspiring and balanced thinking. Congrats.
Posted on January 24 at 9:28 a.m.
The vast majority of people who spend lots of time thinking and speaking about the size of chicken cages are also Pro-Choice (like the author of the letter above) - which means the size of chicken cages is of more importance to them than the killing of millions of (mostly minority race) living humans not yet born, even when Planned Parenthood reports 93% of abortions are for reasons of convenience, not medical or health needs.
.... but about those chicken cages, definitely much more important to focus on. Also veganism, vegetarianism, animal rights. Top priority. Innocent, unborn living humans, not so much.
On Chicken Quarters Barely Better
Posted on January 24 at 9:07 a.m.
CORRECTION:Isn't it great that Lyz Hoffman and/or the Indy have done a cover story and interview with a local Pro Life leader? Oh, wait - they haven't - too biased and close minded to do that.
Additional >It's pretty clear that the vastly lib-dem crowd of human rights advocates, minority rights and social justice advocates, vegans/vegetarians that don't want to harm animals, the anti-fur crowd, etc. all have one thing in common: they are all really comfortable with the killing of living humans, for any reason, between the age of conception and 9 months.
Gives you the warm and fuzzy's, doesn't it?
Posted on January 23 at 11:09 p.m.
Since when did Ms Murillo care about what the role of government is? She supports massive government benefits for illegal aliens, including drivers licenses, amnesty, welfare benefits, and on and on and on.
On The Eastside Assessment Reaches Beyond Milpas
Posted on January 23 at 11:02 p.m.
The vulnerable group we care about are American citizens, which happily include LEGAL immigrants having to cope with the continued presence and flood off illegal immigrants.
This concept is very very hard for many people to understand.
On It's About Accuracy