Page 1 of 1
Posted on September 18 at 4:02 p.m.
I'd like to add a thanks to The Santa Barbara Independent for running this.I can only hope that other media outlets will follow suit. Sorry for the rant but it's necessary. I worked in the south tower for Morgan Stanley and left 1 week before this happened to move back to Texas to work. I lost three good friends in this mass murder. I realize I could easily have been included in that number. I DO NOT discomfort my friends families by asking hard questions. They call me regularly to talk and are asking the same things themselves. They tell me they've been offered blood money to drop criminal complaints and civil lawsuits initiated simply to get to the truth. It disgusts them that what passes for jurisprudence in NY is so openly criminal. It does me too.
On Twin Towers, Twin Myths?
Posted on September 18 at 3:49 p.m.
Mr's Steven Jones, Richard Gage and Neils Harrit have asked the NIST on more than one occasion to debate them openly as to what really brought down these WTC buildings in NYC. You'll notice that I said WTC buildings and NOT WTC complex ? The reason being that there were more than three buildings in the WTC complex. It's just that the three that collapsed were the same buildings built with extra reinforcement so as to withstand incredible damage, fire..etc and remain whole. The towers were so simply because of their tremendous size, building 7 because it housed tons of classified information, was a clearing house for the FBI, CIA (second largest CIA complex outside Langley Virginia) SEC, IRS,Dept of Justice..etc...Building 7 also house the office of emergency management for Manhattan. Buildings 1,2 and 7 were the only buildings to collapse and the only buildings that contained tons of molten steel in their sub basements. Thermal imaging from space revealed temperatures in the areas of the footprints of these buildings at 1200 to 1500 degrees farenheit weeks after these collapses. None of the other buildings in the complex collapsed, building 6 had a hole blown out through the top that could be seen from space, building 5 was completely drowned in debris, both these were lesser buildings structurally than buildings 1,2 and 7 yet never collapsed even though they absorbed tremendous damage from the towers debris. If something enters the building and creates a void it simultaneously fills said void unless it exits the other side. The ridiculous notion that an aluminum airplane (a big beer can with wings) can crush and tear steel is ludicrous. A good example of this is a youtube video of a jetliner making an emergency landing off the Comoros Islands, its left engine snags on a shallow reef and the plane goes to pieces. Case closed.I'm afraid if I were to bet I'd take the 200,000 ton steel and concrete building over a coral reef. The official story of 9/11 and buildings turning to dust because of planes is embarrassingly criminally stupid to whoever concocted this farce. It is standard procedure to test for explosives in a collapse, especially when 100's of witnesses are screaming explosion...Thank God for NYCCAN doing yeomans work and getting this on the ballot for the voters to decide. A REAL INVESTIGATION with subpoena powers will stop the stupidity and hopefully some of the people in charge of enforcing the law will find the wherewithal to do their jobs..