Page 1 of 17
Posted on February 27 at 2:02 p.m.
Actually, there's at least one Jewish Dem. skipping the speech, Rep. John Yarmuth:
On Bibi, Go Home
Posted on February 26 at 6:36 p.m.
Oops - I missed that part of the very short article about that says the new bill would increase the fines. My bad! But still.....
On Williams Drafts Bill to Quash Kardashian-Style Weddings
Posted on February 26 at 4:54 p.m.
$100 fine? That's nothing. How much does the permit cost (in dollars and time)? Probably cheaper and easier to just pay the measly fine than deal with going downtown, finding parking, dodging aggressive panhandlers and protesting Aztec dancers or blabbering racist Tea Party folks from OC all in the effort to obtain a permit.
Posted on February 20 at 10:11 a.m.
Tabatha and Makwa - I think you both (intentionally?) dodged the main point. What the author is asking, is "why aren't ALL the descendants of the Chumash benefiting from the Casino?" Why are only 150 or so out of thousands of local Chumash reaping the benefits of the Casino?
So, I'll ask again, why?
On Some Chumash Are More Equal Than Others
Posted on February 17 at 8:59 a.m.
I've never been to the casino so please excuse my ignorance, but is the wall being erected to create a non-smoking section in the concert hall? In other words, is the entire concert hall currently a smoking zone? That's NASTY.
On Concert Venue Shrinking During Chumash Casino Expansion
Posted on February 13 at 2:19 p.m.
He's a horehound.
On Dildo Wielded During City Council Meeting
Posted on February 12 at 2:39 p.m.
Hmmm..."Pay Me" - I'd like to hear the story behind THAT tattoo! Kids these days.....sheesh!
On Man Arrested for Battery near Bus Depot
Posted on February 12 at 1:23 p.m.
Libel per se requires no such proof of damages, as the statement itself is "considered to be so harmful on its face that the plaintiff need not prove special damages."
And yes, Ken DOES have an attorney, I know him well.
Sam - why don't you do the civilized thing here and remove the statement? What harm is it to you?
On Average Joe Pension
Posted on February 12 at 1:12 p.m.
Sam, I'm at home with a sick kid today, but thanks for your concern.
Again, I'm not making threats, I'm just suggesting you consider the possible ramifications for false accusations of taking "pics of young BOYS" (emphasis added.)
And again, I'll defer to Ken on this. So, that's all I have to say here about that.
Think before you type, mm kay?
Posted on February 12 at 12:46 p.m.
Jarvis - making a public statement that FALSELY asserts someone has committed a crime or some immoral act (eg "taking pics of young boys") is libel per se. Sorry, but that's just what it is.
I'm not threatening legal action (nor would if be actionable if I were). I'm simply suggesting that Sam remove his post due to it's libelous nature. If Ken wants to pursue legal action, that's his right, not mine.