Comments by ty
Page 1 of 3 | Next
Posted on November 19 at 4:47 p.m.
Where are these false rumors and speculation on the Internet that Westmont refers to?
3 of 4 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on November 19 at 4:43 p.m.
Laura Collector's new lawsuit against Westmont for the Tea Fire has gone up in smoke.
1 of 7 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on November 19 at 4:37 p.m.
What's the next progression? Marriage to animals and young children. I see where this is going...
Are my constitutional rights being violated because I cannot marry more than one person at one time? Who should tell me how many people I can MARRY?!?
0 of 5 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on November 19 at 11:52 a.m.
The ONLY reason it was LEGAL for a few months is because some judges BARELY overturned the People's decision. The People have spoken again, this time making it perfectly clear and putting it in the Constitution. Don't get mad, get even. Educate us on why we are wrong. I'll tell you what... the way the No on 8 people are behaving, you won't be getting any sympathy votes next time around.
1 of 1 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on November 19 at 11:22 a.m.
They drove by a HIGH FIRE DANGER sign on their way up there.
2 of 2 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on November 19 at 10:55 a.m.
Statement about the Nov. 18 Tea Fire Press Conference
We have been working closely with the investigators and at no time have they implicated any of our Westmont students.
2 of 2 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on November 19 at 9:40 a.m.
Thanks truthteller40 re: the possibility that it wasn't Westmont students. Maybe they are giving SBCC time to come to grips with the fact that it was their students? Or Brooks? Who knows, let's all wait for the facts and names.
5 of 6 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on November 18 at 9:41 p.m.
They haven't been charged with anything, so take it easy. When the charges are filed, if there are charges, then you will hear the names.
As for their parents, they have nothing to do with this, as they are all, apparently, over 17.
4 of 13 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on November 18 at 9:32 p.m.
I voted YES on Prop 8, as did millions of other people that 1.) don't believe marriage is for anything other than one man and one woman. 2.) don't believe that 4 judges should legislate from the bench. A ban was voted in before and was voted in again. What part of NO didn't they understand?
Page 1 of 3 | Next
Previous Month


3 of 3 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on November 19 at 5:23 p.m.
Sorry for the personal joke. Westmont's been unfairly attacked for the past 24 hours and I made an unfair joke against someone that is constantly attacking their plans to expand.
On Tea Fire Cause Is Determined