Haggen Sues Albertsons for $1 Billion in Damages

After Store Closures, Haggen Says Albertsons Intended to ‘Eliminate’ New Competitor

Wed Sep 02, 2015 | 10:57am
Paul Wellman

[Update, 5:54 p.m., September 2] In response to Haggen’s claims, Albertsons Spokesperson Carlos Illingworth said Albertsons did not participate in bad-faith business dealings against Haggen. He shared a statement with The Independent, saying, “Albertsons has not engaged in anti-competitive or inappropriate practices as alleged by Haggen,” and, as in all of Albertsons’ prior divestitures, “our process with Haggen was the subject of regular reports to the FTC.” Referencing the $41 million lawsuit Albertsons filed against Haggen in July, Illingworth said, “Haggen responded by filing this lawsuit against us in an attempt to deflect attention from their failure to comply with basic contractual obligations.”

[Original Story]

On Tuesday, Haggen filed a complaint against Albertsons, claiming $1 billion in damages and alleging that Albertsons had planned to “eliminate” Haggen as a competitor during the 2015 Safeway-Albertsons merger that saw the Bellingham-based grocery chain acquire 146 ex-Albertsons, Safeway, Vons, and Pavilions stores.

The official complaint states that Albertsons violated two FTC-enforced laws intended to prevent corporate monopolies: the Clayton Act, prohibiting price discrimination and corporate acquisitions that might decrease competition, and the Sherman Act, barring anti-competitive business practices.

Among the allegations of Albertsons’s reported efforts to “sabotage” Haggen’s expansion into the western and southwestern markets are that the grocery giant “strategically” cut off advertising to the stores they were planning to sell in the rebrand, intentionally overstock perishable goods which were transferred to Haggen shelves, and plan discounting and advertising for remaining Albertsons stores in a calculated time table that would “lure” customers away from Haggen.

The complaint awaits finalization in Delaware District Court, as both corporations are Delaware limited liability companies. Although Albertsons had yet to release a formal response to the complaint, Brian Dowling, vice president of public affairs for Albertsons, told The Bellingham Herald the accusations “are completely without merit.”

In July, Albertsons filed a lawsuit against Haggen, claiming that Haggen hadn’t paid for $41 million worth of merchandise and accusing the corporation of fraud.

A copy of Tuesday’s complaint can be read below.


More like this

Exit mobile version