After more than three months online, the reporters of the Santa Barbara Newsroom are turning off their police scanners and computers, filing away their notepads and hitting the streets in preparation for the looming battle with their former employer, the Santa Barbara News-Press.
On their website pm Friday, the eight staff members—winners of numerous state and national awards—announced they would no longer be reporting on Santa Barbara news for the site, and instead be devoting their time and focus to the union campaign and trial, which begins Aug. 14 in Santa Barbara. The newspaper, owned by millionaire Wendy McCaw, will face 15 charges of violations of federal labor law, the majority of them at the expense of the eight reporters. The eight are asking to be reinstated to the newspaper with back pay for the time they missed.
It was a group decision to stop reporting on the website, which launched April 2, according to Dawn Hobbs, who worked at the News-Press for nine years before being fired in February, along with six others for “disloyalty” to the company. Reporters Melinda Burns and Anna Davison had been fired previous to that.
The decision to halt the website will allow the group to get out into the community and speak with people. “Some people in the community think this issue is resolved,” Hobbs said. “This is far from resolved.”
Funding was also a reason for ceasing the site. Advertising at one time was considered, but the group decided it just wouldn’t fit with their intention for the site, according to Burns. Even though the website is done, the group is still asking people for donations to help their legal fight. “Wendy McCaw has the money, but I don’t think she has the support of this community,” Burns said. “Her millions do not make her strong.”
All eight intend to stick around for the trial. Barney McManigal, former county reporter for the News-Press, will be starting graduate school at Oxford University the following month, while everyone else’s intentions are up in the air. But one thing is for sure – the eight are determined to “reclaim the News-Press for good journalism,” Burns said Friday.
Also posted Friday on the website is a special almost half-hour-long “News-Press Mess, One Year Later” documentary produced by Melissa Evans, and featuring commentary from the fired reporters.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
I hate to be a naysayer, but realistically it looks like McCaw's lawyers took a calculated risk and won. That is, they fired the reporters knowing they could be reinstated eventually, but that it would take so long that it wouldn't matter. They played the system, not the law. The decisive factor was losing the injunction that would've put the reporters back pending the proceedings. Now it'll be at least another year before the reporters could be back. How many will wait that long, given that it could be longer? A couple or three, I'd guess.
Meanwhile, a few more of the union supporters inside will gradually leave. The union will be certified, but with few enthusiasts for it remaining inside. So the company will offer a little carrot to get employees to vote to decertify, and how will that go? Just a scenario.
I think the Teamsters got outmanuevered on this one. Justice delayed is justice denied. Some of us bemoan that fact, others exploit it.
Helena_Handbasket (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2007 at 11:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Seriously? They decided against advertising? Amazing.
The ad departments at newspapers fund the newsroom, operations, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc. Why in the world did they think they could be successful without a business plan? No company can exist without sales, how did they miss that? Ego? Who knows?
It's too bad, their mission was admirable.
michelle123456 (anonymous profile)
July 18, 2007 at 1:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The only thing preventing the community from "winning" in this war of attrition against the plainly insane Ampersand organization is the lack of funding for a worthwhile daily newspaper that can be home delivered. The Daily Sound is trying valiantly, but is still sorely lacking in content. I think a lot of observers hoped that some of the solid reporting by the SB Newsroom journalists would end up in print in the Daily Sound. Why this didn't happen is anyone's guess.
Here's the deal: like a lot of locals, I still read the News-Press every morning and continue to be amazed that it actually does give me enough area news to make it a breezy 10 minute read. Granted, for a daily serving a population of 400,000 it is pretty terrible, but it lands on my doorstep every day even though I don't have an active subscription and have made it clear I won't pay for it. Talk about service!
Undoubtedly, Steepleton and Arthur will start hiring more reporters and editors and may even succeed in pulling the paper out of its death spiral. Even with just 25,000 subscribers, half of the advertisers of yesteryear and a moribund classified section, the thing is probably close enough to break even to encourage Wendy that everything is peachy. Result: this charade of a newspaper and national laughingstock will continue indefinitely.
In other words, the window of opportunity for someone to take away the News-Press franchise as the city's paper of record and stomp it to death won't last forever. Unless the Daily Sound grows up quickly (running dogcrap columns by ABC News hack John Stossel doesn't help your cause, Jeramy) or another newspaper emerges, our delightful Payton Place drama featuring a lovable dysfunctional newspaper owner and her allegedly former gigolo boyfriend will run for years, just like the old TV show.
emptynewsroom (anonymous profile)
July 20, 2007 at 10:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment