Dario Pini is hardly the typical Santa Barbara landlord. But Debbie Toga is hardly Santa Barbara’s typical aggrieved neighbor, either.
For the past seven years, Pini — famous for the large number of tenants he packs into his even larger number of holdings — has emerged as a significant player in Santa Barbara’s choice West Beach neighborhood, famous for its delectable ocean views and cozy red-tiled cottages scrunched tightly together. When Toga — a nurse specializing in rare genetic-disorder therapies — and her husband — a world-renowned expert in brain imaging technology — bought a two-bedroom home on West Mason Street 18 months ago, they thought they’d died and gone to heaven. Six months later, they wondered if they’d taken an accidental U-turn and wound up in hell.
Pini, it turned out, owns the property next door at 109 West Mason, and most of his tenants, the Togas would soon discover, were globe-trotting bar-hoppers who’d arrived in Santa Barbara from all corners of the planet to learn the English language. And the rest were subcontractors from Exxon’s Las Flores Canyon facility who worked hard and partied harder. For the Togas, the drunken barbecues at 3 a.m. in their neighbors’ backyard proved too much. All the constant noise prompted the Togas’ tenants — occupying the two adjoining studios — to flee as fast as they could.
Debbie Toga wasn’t shy about calling Pini, who owns two apartments and two hotels within the same block. And Pini, she said, has always been accessible, amiable, and responsive. “He’d come right over in the middle of the night. He’d say he was going to take care of it. But nothing ever changes,” she complained. “It’s always a fire drill, but two days afterward, the chaos and noise are back.” Toga took her case to City Hall, and last Thursday — at her instigation — two beat coordinators with the Santa Barbara Police Department convened a neighborhood meeting at the Veterans Memorial Center. About 40 people showed up.
Among them were two city councilmembers — Cathy Murillo and Dale Francisco — and notable political heavyweights Jim and Sharon Westby — influential strategists and supporters of the council’s conservative faction. Officers Kent Wojciechoski and Adrian Gutierrez encouraged those attending to get to know their neighbors, form a neighborhood watch, file complaints, and get together on a regular basis. But those attending wanted action. How long would it take, they demanded, before City Hall did something? One couple with a young child complained there was drug dealing around one of Pini’s Mason Street properties and that police have investigated reports of prostitution. They wanted video cameras. They wanted legal action. They wanted fines. “There are things going on in the background we can’t talk about,” said Officer Gutierrez, referring, perhaps, to the fact that the city attorney had sued Pini for operating 109 West Mason — a 12-unit apartment — as a motel, which is illegal, and not paying bed taxes.
Pini did not attend the Thursday meeting. Had he attended, he said, he would have explained much of the noise is caused by people who frequent parties at the nearby vet center, get drunk, and then hang around the neighborhood after the center shuts down at 10 p.m. One such inebriate, wielding a knife, chased another person across his parking lot, Pini complained. He’s had to refund Villa Rosa patrons because of the noise these people have made. “It’s not pretty,” he said. Pini acknowledged some of his tenants caused problems, but he stressed that he “addressed the problems immediately.”
While Pini is perhaps best known for renting to large immigrant families, he’s also tapped into Santa Barbara’s expanding market of foreign students looking for temporary digs. “I don’t want to sound prejudiced,” Pini said, explaining that students from Ireland, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia caused serious problems. Because they were monthly rentals, he said he couldn’t just evict them overnight. Instead he’d move them to his other nearby properties where they’d be less immediately disruptive to the peace of their neighbors. The point is, he said, they’re gone. And the subcontractors working for Exxon, he acknowledged, got rowdy after they got off work at 5 a.m. They too are gone, he said, and he won’t rent to them again. As for accusations of drug dealing and prostitution, Pini said, “That’s news to me.” Given that he pays someone to keep an ear glued to the police scanner for trouble arising at any of his rentals, Pini would know.
Pini has been an impact player in Santa Barbara’s rental market for 45 years. In the 1990s, city police conducted a massive inspection of all his properties — then 34 within city limits — and issued 755 health and safety citations. The city attorney prosecuted Pini for unfair business competition, and when Judge Frank Ochoa offered Pini a choice between serving time in one of his apartments or jail, Pini famously opted for jail. Pini takes offense at the slumlord tag, pointing out with considerable justification he’s done more to house Santa Barbara’s immigrant workforce than anyone else. That may be, but neighbors of Pini properties are quick to complain about problems associated with overcrowded properties — uncollected trash chief among them. One Westside resident, concerned about a property Pini is now subdividing, just filed a petition with City Hall signed by 50 of her neighbors to intervene.
Even Pini’s harshest detractors concede he works morning, noon, and night. His rental operation, big in the 1990s, has grown considerably since then, though by how much is unclear. City Hall estimates he has more than 100 properties, to which Pini says only, “I have a few.” Pini is also fast to acknowledge City Hall has never lost interest in his business dealings. “I’ve been under the microscope with these people,” he said. Perhaps that’s one reason he hires a real estate consultant who specializes in litigation strategy and risk management.
Whether Pini and Toga can get along has yet to be determined. Pini, speaking of Toga, said “We need people like her in the neighborhood.” Toga — who with her husband was on a hijacked airplane in 1985 and lived to tell the tale — said she’s not about to move or roll over. Her efforts, she acknowledged, have clearly paid off. “In the past few weeks, it’s been pretty quiet around here,” she said, “but I just wonder for how long.”



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace




Previous Month



Comments
Photo caption: "All right, let's have it out--right here!"
billclausen (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 1:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Now on a serious note: Drunks and overcrowding...all Pini's fault?...I don't think so.
When they're rich UCSB kids in the downtown bars using the lawns of the neighbors as their communal bathroom and vomitorium, the city looks the other way. (Those taxes the bars generate mitigate the stench as far as the politicians are concerned) Overcrowding?...too many students perhaps, a de facto open border which brings in people so poor they have to live elbow-to-elbow and cram many into one apartment.
Whatever Pini's sins may be, it's a symptom of a far greater problem, and he seems to be singled out as being the only Bad Guy in this dystopic situation.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 2:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I wonder how Prop 13 plays into the scheme of things. Collectors and hoarders of real estate often collect when properties values are low. Property taxes are assessed at these low values and essentially frozen; increases at not more than 2% a year, not enough to cover inflation let alone the cost of a new updated Police Headquarters or even a new and improved taser belt or dashcam. Schools also deteriorate, neighborhoods deteriorate, roads deteriorate, etc.
billdlaussen is correct in that we do not want to scapegoat Dario Pini. I have seen improvements made to Pini properties over time and I think that all of the above complaints revolve around our culture of idolizing transient populations of students and tourists and this horrible entertainment or booze-party-Entertainment District downtown.
Then we have these conservative heavyweights the Westbys and the Lodge/Arias/Francisco/Hotchkiss preservationist crowd who want to preserve the status quo. And to be fair our liberal side seems to be actively promoting this fabulously overdone 24/7/365 Deiters Dance Party scene.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 6:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I don't know about y'all, but I'm perfectly happy scapegoating Pini. There's plenty of landlords in SB who work hard to make it a better, more beautiful place to live. I've seen many of Pini's properties (drove by two of them this morning on the Westside). Virtually every one is surrounded by urban blight -- garbage, shopping carts, weeds, blaring music, and broken-down vehicles. He, personally, as an individual, lowers the quality of life for everyone in SB, rich and poor alike. Why don't you stop scapegoating Prop 13, and lay the blame where it belong: with greedy, irresponsible, bad citizens like Pini?
banjo (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 9:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It is just as much our fault as it is his fault for letting it happen. Even if you don't own any property. What's next, are we going to blame him for gangs and illegal immigration also?
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 9:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
As a retired US Marine officer who has seen some action and a retired law enforcement professional who has gathered lots of facts, there is something about this story that just doesn't add up. I did a little sleuthing and discovered Ms. Toga has been trying to rent out a ONE bedroom apartment at the rear of her property for $2,500: http://hotpads.com/rentals/119b-W-Mas....
Seems pretty steep to me, maybe she wants to get her "heaven" paid by others and is frustrated she can't rent it because the rent is so high? Not making any accusations (yet) but I always check all the facts before jumping to conclusions.
DavidatTheBeach (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 10:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"notable political heavyweights" ?
HA HA!
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 10:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Who cares if Toga wants to rent her unit for $25,000 a month, or lets it out for free? This wouldn't change the fact that Pini's properties are downright scary, and a disgrace to the city. What about the other hundreds or thousands of Pini's victims who live around his properties, and who are just trying to have a decent quality of life, but are subjected to intolerable conditions because of his greed and poor citizenship?
banjo (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 10:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I totally agree with banjo. Pini is well known for being a slumlord, overcrowding his properties and not putting any money into repairs or even decently fixing them up. He wants to blame the noise on people going to events at the Vets building?? Fat chance. And now he is in the hotel business and has let the Villa Rosa, which was once a popular charming Inn, completely fall into disrepair and the Alamar Motel, well let's just say I'm glad that they are all over his ass now but very doubtful that anything at any of his properties will be changing...he is a blight on the community.
sbgirl2 (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 2:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It actually does matter that Ms. Toga is asking $2500/mo for a one bedroom rental. She's claiming that here tenants won't stay because of the noise, but the high rent, "conveniently" not mentioned in the article, is also a likely factor for attrition. I know for a fact that nice two bedroom apartments in that same area of town peak out at around $2500/mo unless they're very luxurious.
That said, Mr. Pini would be wise to hire a professional property manager and make it his or her job to police his properties. I'm in real estate myself, and life has been a million times easier since I hired outside help.
Lars (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 2:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There was an article on Pini, "Dario Pini Nominated to Landlord Hall of Shame," in which I Googled him and then wrote the following:
(May 11, 2011)
"Just in case Mr. "Lars" missed it, the reporter of this piece is writing about the Tenant's Together group naming Pini to the Landlord Hall of Shame.
Here's some quick links on this website I got by using the Search function with Pini's name in them:
- Dario Pini's Problems:
http://www.independent.com/news/2007/...
- Student Objects to Housing Provided by EF School
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/...
Google "dario pini lawsuits" and you get a number of items, including:
- Santa Maria landlord forced to pay $1 million for unsafe living conditions
http://www.ksby.com/news/santa-maria-...
- Two police officers received an award for successfully coordinating a multi-agency action against Pini:
"Beginning in August 1994, Officer Kim Fryslie and Officer
Michael Aspland developed a P.O.P. project involving Mr. Dario Pini, a slum lord who owns 34 properties in the City of Santa Barbara. Many city agencies have known about Mr. Dario Pini's property management tactics for many years, however; none took on the task of addressing the problems as a whole. The problems became chronic since no one was holding Mr. Pini accountable for the squalor he created."
http://www.popcenter.org/library/awar... (this is a PDF file)
- Surfside Motel owner [Pini] to pay $75,000
"In 1998, he pleaded no contest to 11 counts of building without proper permits and was fined $476. In 2001, he was convicted of three similar charges and fined $3,200.
"In December 2003, Port Hueneme officials cited Pini for numerous wastewater, fire district, building and safety, and code compliance violations at the motel."
"A June 2004 inspection found violations in nearly every motel room, including inoperable smoke detectors, leaking sinks, running toilets, rotted ceilings and cockroach infestation." "
http://www.vcstar.com/news/2007/sep/0...
------
The record is quite clear, and back in May 2011, "Lars" was more energetic in his defense of Pini:
http://www.independent.com/news/2011/...
Chester_Arthur_Burnett (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 2:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lars -- I wonder if anyone else here would agree with you that the rent has anything to do with the real issue here, which is that Pini is a slumlord. Not only are his properties slums, but his properties turn the areas around them into slums. Pini will never hire a professional property management company because 1) he's too greedy to pay them, and 2) no reputable property management company in this town would associate themselves with these disreputable properties. If there was ever a man that deserved to be tarred and feathered, and rode out of town on a rail, it's Pini.
banjo (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 8:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I just clicked Chester's link from last year. The Independent really does seem to enjoy publicly embarrassing this guy. But what I find the most interesting is this posting which came a couple months after the May 2011 Independent article was published:
Hi. I am a renter of a DPI apartment. I hear and understand the complaints, with the most sympathy for people who probalby pay alot of money for their homes and then have to put up with some of the crowds that are seemingly in a completely different world - a lower income world specifically. (ie: on Valerio). I am a single mother of 4 children who found myself having to start over. I had no credit in my name (thought I would be married forever ;-p). Did the Transition house for a few months and saved up money - NO ONE would rent an apartment to me, even private owners! because I had no credit and 4 children. Dario Pini was the only one. He offered me furniture. I was able to move from one apartment to another complex with the same deposit. I work full time and have been at the same job and in this same apartment for a year now. Yeah, it's like pulling teeth to get things fixed. Yeah our complexes aren't all pristine, and I understand there's probably even criminals harboring in some of these places! But they're just the low income criminals, the higher income criminals have the nice houses. It's like in the days when the people would say 'there goes the nieghborhood, they let a ____________ (insert racial/ethnic slur here) in!' There's no perfect world, no perfect neighborhood, unless you wanna try for the Stepford Wives culture...Dario Pini may be a douchebag, I don't know. But theres good with the bad.
Lars (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 9:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I have another caption for that picture: "Why you busting my b***s for? Hey! Ho!"
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
June 28, 2012 at 10:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lars; Thanks. I've heard this type of account before. Your perspective is valid. Pini has explained his position and as this article points out is at least somewhat responsive. Those that are more respected and even more corrupt in our culture can be pretty bad neighbors and are given a pass.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2012 at 6:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Where there is demand, there will be supply.
sbmomandpop (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2012 at 8:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Lars -- I know exactly which Pini slum that poster (may have been Pini himself) in May 2011 is talking about on Valerio, and it's one of the worse. My wife was walking the dog by that place (actually, it's two places) one evening about a month ago, and came home with a cut on her toe (wearing sandals) from a rusty BBQ grill that, along with other assorted garbage, littered the sidewalk in front of the buildings. This morning, there were five shopping carts in front of them. The cops are there ALL THE TIME. How much tax money and police time is Pini wasting through his greed and disrespect for our community? He obviously has a special talent for renting to people that have no pride in their neighborhood and no self-respect. What is it with all the Pini apologists around here? As for the Independent "embarrassing" Pini, you can't embarrass someone who has no shame.
banjo (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2012 at 8:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Plenty of people make good money in this town renting nice apartments to good tenants. I mean "good" as in quiet, clean on the outside anyway, regular paying high rents. Could Pini make money this way? Yes. Could he make more by renting to young transients month-to-month and doing the bare minimum of maintenance? Hell yes. I realize in this town anyone who will rent to a person with poor credit is rare, but is it really so kind when the chez you offer a single mom and 4 children is rickety, failing codes and summoning the cops regularly? I used to be a Pini neighbor on lower De La Vina; even among the other places there, Pini's buildings and tenants stood out as the worst.
Nitz (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2012 at 9:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The Togas have every right to sell the property and move, unless, however, the property value is now underwater. And isn't Pini just providing low income, higher density housing, the ultimate goal of the "General Plan."
native2sb (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2012 at 10:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Ok, 4 paragraphs in, I've read enough COMPLAINING!!
Move the F*$(% AWAY if you don't like your neighbors and stop acting like whiney brats.
Santa Barbara is a nice place and ultimately people are going to move here who want to have a good time and party. If you don't like it, move to Montana or something. What the hell is wrong with people??
loonpt (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2012 at 10:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sure, respectable people should just pack up the family, sell the house, and move to Montana. That sounds like a great solution.
banjo (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2012 at 10:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Besides the above mentioned problems of Piini's complexes, the places he buys he allows to deteriorate at breath taking speeds. I live near a couple of these hell holes and after he bought them,he just stopped maintaining anything. Now if the landlord that owns the building and paid good money for it doesn't take care of the place, why should we expect the children growing up in these dumps to take care of the rest of this town. The graffiti and litter all over town are the result of growing up in a building where the landlord just doesn't care.
sbkid (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2012 at 12:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
My mom used to live in a Pini property. The city forced him to close it and make repairs. His reputation was that of a slum lord. I haven't heard about him in a while I wonder if he has changed.
deniseL (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2012 at 2:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So Dari Pini is obviously a very unique landlord and he and his tenants don't travel in our social circles. Pini presents himself as a benevolent type who houses people no one else would house (not even the service industry who might employee them) but apparently Pinis' tenants must put up with conditions that most of us wouldn't put up with. And how many people profit and live in various illegal non-Pini garage units citywide?
So the crimes are noise and code violations. There are remedies. And no, no one should be required to move in order to obtain a residence where you are entitled to the peaceful and quite enjoyment of your home. But a lot of people think that about many degraded areas of the city.
But again you need to look at this hoarding and the tax incentives. Devaluation isn't a problem for Pini because the property values go up regardless. Policing and other governmental services go down because of this long-term hoarding with fixed property taxes remaining flat or regressive when adjusted for inflation or new services required.
And then when someone wants to improve properties, such as Chapala Street the breathy preservationist eyeballs bugg-out and start chiming in that undesirables who can't afford to live here in Santa Barbara should just move to Bakersfield or Fresno. One preservationist, Council Member Dale Francisco, lives in an old ladies and gentlemens Upper East prop 13 protected or subsidized single family dwelling. I guess Francisco is making the right kind of noise but regardless the property owners are profiting at the expense of newer taxpayers and at the expense of your local school districts, police services and roadway maintenance, etc.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2012 at 3:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
" Not making any accusations (yet) but I always check all the facts before jumping to conclusions"
Could you possibly be more dishonest?
truth_machine (anonymous profile)
June 30, 2012 at 10:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Don -- I agree that the various tax schemes in our country have created many undesirable outcomes, such as allowing bad actors like Pini to create real estate empires that exploit the poor. While I, personally, would contend that Prop 13 has been one of the most beneficial laws in the history of CA for the poor and middle class, including renters, I would point out that the fatal flaw in your Prop 13 argument is that the overwhelming number of landlords in SB do, in fact, maintain their properties for the benefit of both their tenants and their community. With all due respect, your claim that rich preservationists in the Upper East would somehow potentially obstruct improvements to Pini's slums is pure fantasy. Pini is way too busy destroying properties -- and neighborhoods -- for this ever to become an issue. Anyone who truly cared about the plight of the poor would be outraged by the living conditions that Pini subjects his tenants to.
banjo (anonymous profile)
June 30, 2012 at 11:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
banjo misunderstands. My point is that rich, poor, young, old, etc, anyone that uses Prop 13 to accumulate portfolios of properties frozen at Prop 13 tax levels are doing so at the expense of our community, our 'public' schools, universities, police and fire departments, roads, sewers, parks, bridges, open space, services, etc. The Prop 13 allowed annual increase of 2% does not even cover inflation let alone new governmental/community needs, desires and requirements or replacement costs of aging infrastructure.
Evidence abounds if you look around. Tenants may indeed have a very nice place to live, maybe not, but unless you live in a wealthy district your municipality infrastructure and services are deteriorating. We either figure out how to increase revenues, borrow from future generations, grow, or we continue to let things go. Take your pick.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
June 30, 2012 at 12:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Here's a thought. Pini works to improve property and get on the backs of his messy tenants-either evicts them, or cleans up after them. The tenants are told to be quiet or get evicted and they can party themselves blue in the face-downtown at the bars, or at another home. When the tenants grow up and buy their own homes (or not) they can resume their own lifestyles. You have to conform to the landlord's wishes-that is the downside of renting. Obviously, this man is not being an active landlord. He could give up that business-after all, there are already enough bad landlords in SB to go around. This is a class issue, obviously, but can be dealt with. Guess that's a duh, though.
therailer (anonymous profile)
June 30, 2012 at 12:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
herc1bear2 (anonymous profile)
October 12, 2012 at 8:36 p.m.