Comments by bimboteskie
Previous | Page 3 of 52 | Next
Posted on April 18 at 11:54 a.m.
Yeah, watch the video. Tudor should have "lit him up" after TUDOR ran the first stop sign. Why instead did Tudor wait so long and endanger so many other drivers lives by letting Denunzio drive all the way to Harry's? What a joke. All you cops and DA's bashing DG on here need to get a life.
Posted on April 17 at 11:53 a.m.
So, looking at my calendar, does this mean Denunzio and his legal representation, whomever it may be for the civil suit, will have until October to file against the City?
Posted on April 16 at 3:03 p.m.
So, if “All of this indicates a lack of prey,”? then aren't we sort of messing with nature's balance by saving all these little ones? Yes they are cute..etc...but still, what else must be out of whack and are we just making it worse?
Posted on April 16 at 10:48 a.m.
Recently in another local webpage/publication where comments can be left on this very subject, someone used the word "corrupt" which ignited a mini firestorm of slander, and character attack retaliation threats which seemed pretty ridiculous. Thus the "C" word.
Posted on April 16 at 10:19 a.m.
Oh he will go after the city.. the city's DOLLARS! I hope he takes them to the cleaners and it makes everyone very upset. I believe the city is insured for these types of blunders so don't worry about your street sweeping, but the mere sticker shock will probably spell the end for the DA's reelection hopes, and hopefully get some oversight for the COPS. Actually, you cannot say without a reasonable doubt that he was guilty. Bash his character all you want, he is like this, he is like that. Whatever. Watch the video again and Tudor jumping out of the bushes like a weirdo. Something is just not right with that. Finally, DG, you used the "C" word! OMG! :)
Posted on April 11 at 9:54 a.m.
I fail to see any showdown? Sounds like they just plain chickened out.
Posted on April 11 at 9:41 a.m.
The Bacara behavior has long been a sore spot with the people of Goleta. While our heritage doesn't go back 6000 years, people did/do care about the place, and were careful about respecting the previous people that lived in the area and their artifacts. Beside the fact it is a huge fine and crime for any average Joe to disturb any artifacts.
The first Bacara owner/developer didn't exhibit caring about anything but himself, because he really didn't even need the money. He just wanted a place to play. For some reason, no one cared enough to stop him, they just saw dollar signs. So here we are. The new owners seem nothing like this.
I think a $575K perimeter would be poor decision. That money should be used to fight other legal battles regarding misuse of land/beach access by the Coastal Commission for the people of California. If the Chumash feel there needs to be a monument built, have the Casino chip in. The last thing we need are a bunch more fences put up at the beach with my tax money paying for it.
Posted on April 10 at 9:45 p.m.
They absolutely knew. They had representatives there to monitor the grading in case anything was brought up that shouldn't have been. Alvin also hired a bevy of thugs to be there to guard against anything that might stop progress. I remember the day.
Posted on April 10 at 4:21 p.m.
Get Real Peter,
If anything Chumash related were to have an aesthetically pleasing perimeter built around it, half of SB/Goleta would have to be removed. How about just returning it to it's natural state, and leaving it alone like the agreement stipulated? No fences, no nothing. I think the Casino could come up with $500k in about half a day and hopefully find something better to do with it than build an aesthetically pleasing perimeter.
I have a question: Why did the Chumash not protest or sue to stop the Bacara construction in the first place?
Previous Month
Posted on April 18 at 12:54 p.m.
Why is a CHP the chaperon of this type of meeting?
Nice photobomb white shirt guy.
On Bees (and Flies) in the Bonnet