• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Voices Raised in Montecito


    Wednesday, January 10, 2007
    By J'Amy Brown (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Salud Carbajal Rebuffed at Tuesday's Board of Supervisors Hearing

    boS%20004.jpgAt Tuesday’s meeting of the Board of Supervisors (BOS), the rookie Montecito watchdog group, Voices of Montecito let out a roar that could be heard throughout the county of Santa Barbara. When the reverberation ended, three Montecito Planning Commissioners found themselves unceremoniously unseated, their appointments delayed for two weeks pending a further BoS review that could also include a re-examination of the Montecito Planning Commission (MPC) itself.

    While First District Supervisor Salud Carbajal held to the mandatory podium politeness during the supes’ meeting, afterwards he said he was affronted by the “lack of civility about protocols and procedures by my north county colleagues,” who voted, in a block, to block Carbajal’s scheduled MPC appointments.

    “The delay goes against the protocols, procedures, and etiquette of past boards. I think this sets a precedent. I hope this isn’t the start of a precarious future for the Board of Supervisors that has in the past collectively tried to be civil and deferential towards one another and toward historic procedures,” Carbajal said. Normally all board and commission appointments are ho-hum administrative items that pass without comment or debate, but not on Tuesday!

    The boS%20009.jpgbattle came into play after a congenial swearing-in ceremony, complete with former Governor Pete Wilson as the bonding keynote speaker and BoS Chair Joni Gray highlighting how important it was to work together, adding “a war avoided is a war won.” However, as the board reconvened after a reception, the members must have donned flack jackets in the ante room because the mood moved from conciliation to confrontation.

    With the party-crowd gone, only a few Montecito stalwarts graced the chambers for the unexpected showdown. Among them were Voices of Montecito leaders Lee Luria and Mary Belle Snow, along with Montecito Planning Commissioner Michael Phillips, up for reappointment, and Sue Burrows, expecting her first MPC appointment. (The third MPC non-nomination went to Bob Bierig, who was side-stepped the in-person humiliation opportunity. He’s rumored to be tapped as the MPC chair on January 17 — an item muddled by his non-appointment and leaving, perhaps, the MPC with no chair.)

    Citizen Luria rose to the podium at the public comment. She said the planning process in Montecito disappointed her and that the process of choosing appointees to the MPC didn’t seem very open. “I would ask that the Board of Supervisors defer making any decisions on new commissioners until these and other issues have been dealt with in an open and democratic forum,” she said.

    boS%20003.jpgMary Belle Snow, who resides on the borderline of Montecito in the First District’s Toro Canyon planning area, spoke on behalf of Voices of Montecito and she added her concern about the process of choosing Montecito’s Planning Commissioners. “I want to address this debacle we call Montecito planning,” she said, adding, in the opinion of Voices of Montecito, the commission’s current make up is not representative of the community. “We are not pulling from a large enough pool of applicants and that results in continuous replication of the same people serving year after year.”

    Andy Caldwellof the Coalition of Labor, Agriculture & Business said the Montecito Planning Commission had “a wider reach” than just Montecito and therefore, he suggested, the entire Board of Supervisors should review MPC applicants. Because Montecito is situated in the First District, to date, all MPC Commissioners and Montecito Board of Architectural Review members have been appointed by Supervisor Carbajal and confirmed by the Board of Supervisors.

    “When it comes to planning issues [the MPC doesn’t] just represent Supervisor Carbajal. They represent the entire board,” Caldwell said. “In view of the public testimony you are hearing today, it is apparent something is broken in the system and we need a time-out here to review this relationship and determine if there really is a need for Montecito to have its own planning commission. Let’s bring this back and have a discussion.”

    With that, Supervisor Joni Grey made a motion, seconded by Supervisor Joe Centeno to defer the MPC appointment until January 23. Supervisor Janet Wolf — installed literally minutes before the fracas began — cast her first vote in support of Carbajal’s position, but when Grey’s motion carried by a 3-2 vote, Wolf’s first-ever vote went, alas, into the loss column.

    Lee%20Luria%20and%20Mary%20Belle%20Snow%20a%20the%20BoS.jpgFollowing the first round of political muscle flex came a second round eyebrow-raiser. Without discussion or concern, the board gave unanimous approval to Carbajal’s appointments of five returning Montecito Board of Architectural Review (MBAR) candidates. MBAR is the design review arm of the MPC, which makes recommendations and modifications to designs such as the Biltmore seawall. (It was that MBAR opinion, for example, that that led to Ty Warner’s appeal to the BoS, an issue viewed with distain by the board.) However, those provocative MBAR vets Peter Edwards, Ray Ketzel, Sam Maphis, Michele Michaelson, and Tony Spann all got the Supes’ full-on approval to march forward.

    Supervisor Carbajal said the MBAR appointments reassured his belief that very little will change in the next two weeks. “In two weeks two things will happen: one, my three colleagues from the north will have had time to review their own process and become enlightened that it is the same process they used to appoint their North County BAR; and, two, I will put forward the same slate of commissioners I put forward today. I am glad we have two weeks, however, because it will give the boarder community of Montecito a chance to attend the next board meeting and in the mean time they can let their feelings be known about the value they place on the Montecito Planning Commission.”

    Robert Meghreblian, who thought he retired from the MPC in December, may have to stay on through the January 17 MPC meeting or until new appointments are made. As Meghreblian is the founder of the MPC, Montage asked his opinion on the current BOS review. He said he felt nothing but pride for the MPC’s work and worth.

    “In the past four years of its existence, the MPC has reviewed three to four hundred cases and very few were appealed. It has been very effective and we took a great deal of care reviewing these items. The county and community have been well served,” Meghreblian said.

    MA REPORT: Just to top the day off, Montage went by the Montecito Association (MA) annual meeting to get reaction to the dissing MA received at the hands of the BoS, but we heard nothing because they cut their meeting short for parliamentary reasons.

    Officer nominating committee chair Bill Palladini said the committee had decided not to offer a slate of officers for the first time in nearly 60 years because the organization was going to restructure itself at a retreat later in January. (You may recall they had ballot problems this year as well, but they seem to have gotten through it because they announced four new board members.)

    Because the by-laws require officers be elected at the January meeting, Pallidini said no further business could be conducted. With that, Past-Present-Interim (we’re unsure) President Bob Collector gaveled down and the MA January meeting came to an abrupt end — leaving Montage to contemplate the bang-up beginning of Monte-centric politics-2007.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Good column.

    Robert C. Meltzer
    January 10, 2007 at 6:33 p.m.

    Hopefully, Supv. Carbajal will now get the message he should have gotten when his MPC was censured by the Board of Supervisors last month.

    Robert C. Meltzer
    January 10, 2007 at 6:34 p.m.

    One more time:

    The special Montecito Planning Association was formed to make them happy with some local control so they do not incorporate as a new city and keep all their property tax revenue that otherwise funds a substantial part for the whole County. This has been documented well at this Montage blog site and elsewhere.

    Do these new rabblers and Gray, Centeno, and Firestone want Montecito to keep ALL of its property tax money?

    First District Streetfighter
    January 10, 2007 at 8:21 p.m.

    Sounds pretty selfish to me. Why should Montecito fund the county? And BTW, if the Miramar was in operation there would be even more taxes to fight over. Even more reason to get the planning process under control so large potential tax revenue generators like Warner don't walk away in disgust. BTW, put your real name up there so the public knows who stands for what.

    Robert C. Meltzer
    January 10, 2007 at 8:45 p.m.

    Nipomo resident Andy Caldwell, a fierce defender of local control, weighed in on the appointment of community members to a local Board that exists 100 miles from his home. The 3 supervisors who try to lecture the south county on what it means to have oak trees and farms decided it was somehow within their scope of expertise to derail the appointments of Commissioners in a community they know absolutely nothing about and have nothing in common with.

    Their meddling will not soon be forgotten.

    We should have supported the county split. Why send our tax money up to support their drain on local services?

    ban the north county intruders
    January 10, 2007 at 8:47 p.m.

    Years ago the Montecito powers that be (and in some cases still ARE) decided Montecito should never have to be a city. They thought they could enjoy all the benefits of a city by sponging off the county and not have to bear any of the hardships of cityhood like affordable housing allotments. They thought the tax revenues they paid at that time were a small price to pay for owning the county.

    But these Valley Club head-in-the-sanders never took into consideration that one day sleepy little North County would rule the roost—along with our Supervisor, and Montecito’s destiny. Well, future is here, folks, and the old relics that missed the boat should hang their head in shame for their lack of vison instead futilely trying still run things via the Montecito Association. If even one more Montecito Planning Commissioner comes from the ranks of the Montecito Association this community should arrive in mass to demand the end of that unbalanced body. Our Supervisor needs to know there is a new voice in Montecito and he’d better be listening up!

    New Guard
    January 10, 2007 at 9:19 p.m.

    The new chair, Brooks Firestone looked confused as usual, Joni Gray gave a long speech about herself, and closed with a veiled warning to Janet Wolf and Salud Carbajal.."a fight not fought, is a fight won!"..I could barely watch her..she's such a phony! Now, when the new Montecito Whiner's Club called "Voices of Montecito" complained about the Montecito Planning Commission and Montecito Association and the appointed members, the board majority decided to hold hearings! Why? Because COLAB's Willie Chamberlain told Andy Caldwell to tell them to! When COLAB says JUMP..the "three amigos" (Firestone, Centeno and Gray) say "how high?"

    We pay the supes $80,000 a year, and Firestone, Centeno and Gray can't figure out how people are appointed to commissions? Janet Wolf tried gracefully to move the process along, but the "three amigos" wouldn't allow it!

    Most of this stems from Ty Warner's "STEPS to the BEACH" controversy. Ty wants to spend the money to refurbish the steps, but only if it's his way! The county needs to STEP back and stop accepting money from this guy! He is ruining Channel Drive! His orange citadel has been under construction for five years now! All the while, an ugly green construction curtain has be hiding this massive eyesore..what are the three amigos doing about that? NADA!

    Sonny
    January 10, 2007 at 11:41 p.m.

    The so-called "new guard" aka Melzer (who doesn't live in montecito) aka "voices of montecito" really consists of perhaps a dozen or so disgruntled pro-unfettered development types. It will be a hoot to return to the Board hearing in a couple of weeks to tally the numbers of the "new guard" vs. the "actual" montecito-ites......poor brooks, joni, joe are so clueless and so easily led like lapdogs by chamberlain, caldwell and warner. you know what they say about payback....

    (not so) new guard
    January 11, 2007 at 6:48 a.m.

    Sounds like Solly (or is it Sol or is it Sonny - still won't say who he really is) is back with his hysterical rants. Meltzer (that's me - try to get the name spelled right), as I've repeatedly and publicly stated under my own actual real name, is not and never was a "development type", just a believer in private property rights and democratic government, as opposed to rule by tyrannical minorities, NIMBYs, and BANANAs. Are "actual" montecito-ites the people of some special birthright who have divine guidance for Montecito? Oops, that's right - no birthrights in this country...

    Robert C. Meltzer
    January 11, 2007 at 8:30 a.m.

    Meltdownzer..you're a broken record. This is a BLOG! If you need to check IDs at the door, start your own blog and stipulate that to posters (and see how many you get.) You get to bloga as you see fit..that's called freedom..it's the american way..you've heard of America, haven't you?

    Sonny
    January 11, 2007 at 9:47 a.m.

    By Golly it is Solly - I'd recognize that style anywhere. And here I thought BLOG meant Be Logical Or Go, but I guess according to you a BLOG is for your American Way (anonymous hysterical ranting, name-calling, and insults)? And you're allowed to vote with that brain? Guess that's why BLOG means Be Loud

    Robert C. Meltzer
    January 11, 2007 at 9:54 a.m.

    Oops, clicked POST too soon. Last sentence should be 'Guess BLOG actually means Be Long On Gall'.

    Robert C. Meltzer
    January 11, 2007 at 9:58 a.m.

    Hey, Sonny. Since you don't have anything interesting to say, shut up.

    YoMomma
    January 11, 2007 at 10:46 a.m.

    YoMeltzer finally figured it out and got himself a nickname..it's YoMomma! Maybe the two of you, working together, can sober up Firestone.. (hic)!

    Sonny
    January 11, 2007 at 10:57 a.m.

    pretty tough trail to follow, eh, genius?

    Robert C. Meltzer
    January 11, 2007 at 11:12 a.m.

    No RC Cola! I got it..I believe I am a genuis! I just figured out why you have a pathological need for bloggers to identify themselves..it stems from a deep-seated feeling of inferiority..hence, your demands that everyone do as you do..you're a lonely guy..or another theory is you use your name to attract rich Montecito widows (ers?) by sucking up to guys like Ty Warner! My analysis is complete..no need to thank me

    Sonny
    January 11, 2007 at 12:27 p.m.

    You do know that you've revealed yourself, don't you?

    Robert C. Meltzer
    January 11, 2007 at 12:35 p.m.

    OF COURSE!! Call me and let's do lunch!

    Sonny
    January 11, 2007 at 12:41 p.m.

    in your fondest dreams

    Robert C. Meltzer
    January 11, 2007 at 12:45 p.m.

    You guys crack me up! I love it! You are Actually more cordial than Trump and the ex "Queen of Nice."

    Azure Sees
    January 11, 2007 at 4:13 p.m.

    HOw pathetic these wannabe Montecitans have to engage in this childish ranting....who is this Meltzer guy.....must be new-ish to Santa Barbara given his 'style'

    too much free time
    January 12, 2007 at 6:19 a.m.

    Aw, gee, now you've hurt my feelings. Just what is the appropriate "style" for Santa Barbara? Anonymous name-calling? Personal attacks instead of debating issues? Kinda like the "style" of the 60s radicals.

    "Who is this Meltzer guy"? Scroll upward and see if you get the point....

    Robert C. Meltzer
    January 12, 2007 at 8:39 a.m.

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    54.0°
    Wind:
    6 W

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    2. Eating Animals
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. Gardens of Rare Books
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.