It has been one month since Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital closed its doors to Medi-Cal patients who seek voluntary admission to the psychiatric inpatient unit, known as 5 East. The shut-out resulted from a breakdown in negotiations between the hospital and Santa Barbara County over reimbursement rates for indigent patients. Under pressure from Prop 63 4 Me — a two-year-old advocacy group made up exclusively of clients of the county’s Alcohol, Drug and Mental Health Services Department — officials from the hospital and the county are only now making moves to resolve the situation.
According to Lisa Moore, Cottage’s vice president in charge of clinical services, it cost the hospital more than $800,000 out of its own coffers last year to treat county patients in 5 East. When the contract between the county and Cottage expired in July, the county offered 20 percent less per night of care, bringing Cottage’s anticipated loss this year to more than $1 million. In addition, said Moore, the county pressured the hospital to start accepting involuntary admissions again. “They said we won’t even negotiate with you unless you agree to take involuntary admissions,” said Moore, “but we aren’t able to because we don’t have room.”
On average, about 17 patients stay at 5 East, and there are only 20 beds. The hospital takes in an average of four county clients monthly, Moore said. There is also a shortage of psychiatrists in Santa Barbara, and involuntarily admitted patients require more intense psychiatric services. “We’re at an impasse,” said Moore.
On Tuesday, two women who are members of Prop 63 4 Me told the county supervisors that the situation was “unacceptable.” Bob Quinn, another spokesperson for the group, said that psychiatrically disabled people seek admission when they are in crisis, most commonly from depression, mania, or schizophrenia. If admittted, they typically stay in the unit for about three days, Quinn said, but occasionally for several weeks, during which time they receive a safe bed, support, psychiatric attention, and possibly adjustments to their medication.
The only alternative to voluntary admission into the Cottage psych unit is the county’s 16-bed facility for involuntary psychiatric admissions, called the Psychiatric Health Facility (PHF), which is located on the county’s Calle Real campus. This unit is “less humane,” according to one patient who has been to both: Patients are more violent, and the staff is quick to resort to physical or medicinal restraints. People are referred to PHF usually in response to police calls, and only if they are a danger to themselves or others, or adjudged to be “severely disabled,” a difficult standard to meet. Moreover, activists with Prop 63 4 Me are concerned about the stay in PHF becoming part of a criminal record or harming job prospects.
In the absence of the option of voluntary admission to 5 East, county mental health clients who come to the emergency room are still seen there by a team of psychiatric services staff members. They are sometimes able to find a vacancy in Ventura’s Vista del Mar Hospital. If not, they are sometimes turned onto the street, even if their condition is serious enough to meet the criteria for admission to the unit. More often than not, Mental Health Services clients are homeless, or living in shelters or in hard-to-get federally subsidized housing for people with low incomes. Frequently, their behavior while in crisis endangers their housing arrangments, according to Quinn.
Doug Barton, interim director of Alcohol, Drug and Mental Health Services, reportedly told Quinn on Monday that he sent a letter before Cottage Hospital asked for a meeting but had not heard back yet. (Department officials could not be reached for comment, referring all inquiries to the county’s official press contact, William Boyer.) According to Moore, Cottage CEO Ron Werft will meet with Barton to resume negotiations, possibly before the end of October. On October 9, the Board of Supervisors approved a motion to put the matter on the agenda, though they did not set a definite date.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
I think the PHF should consider taking voluntary admits, too. This way the clients who need the care, yet are afraid the "involuntary" admit will be reflected on their records and therefore affect job or other opportunities, won't have that concern. If the county wants Cottage to take involuntary admissions, they should be willing to compromise, too, and allow their very own clients to be admitted voluntarily when they need hospitalization for med/mood stabilization.
No where in this article is it mentioned that the county also does not provide beds for anyone under the age of 18 or over the age of 64. This means if you are in these age ranges and must be hospitalized, you will, by necessity be leaving the county for the care you need.
Cottage is able to care for people over 64 on the Psychiatric Unit if they are able to maintain a minimum of self-care such as personal hygiene and ability to move about the unit on their own steam.
Our community is not alone in this quandry, we Americans make this choice daily not to properly fund all sorts of people in need. The mental health community is an important part of this neglected area of American culture. Our tax money should be spent in more humane and responsible ways than funding war where we are not wanted or needed (among other areas of waste too numerous to mention).
mensunderpanties (anonymous profile)
October 11, 2007 at 10:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you for writing this article. It spotlights the lack of financial resources for delivery of mental health services. It is a point that the public (individuals) should take to their representatives in government... to increase the funding for needed mental health resources and services.
What the general public does not often realize is that despite the OVERWHELMING NEED for mental health services (i.e. mental health issues are responsible for the most days of missed work, 40+% of all doctor's appointments have mental health issues as a part of the presenting problem, and two antidepressants are in the top 10 medications prescribed) the REIMBURSEMENTS are LOW, compared to health visits involving procedures (i.e. immunizations, blood work, X-rays, IV's or suturing). However, there has been some PROGRESSION forward, as the co-pay for outpatient mental health services has recently been lowered from 50% of fee.
Please become part of the solution -- advocate for mental health funding by contacting your local representatives in government.
jcarlsonmd (anonymous profile)
October 15, 2007 at 8:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment