• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Paul Wellman

    Cold Spring Canyon Arch Bridge


    Funding Found for Suicide Barrier

    Cold Spring Bridge Suicide Barrier Project Overcomes Monetary Obstacles


    Friday, July 17, 2009
    By Caitlin Crandell (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    The final funding obstacle preventing the construction of a suicide barrier on Cold Spring Bridge seems to have been overcome in Thursday’s Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) meeting. The project, which has been a source of public controversy for some time, will be made possible by a complicated three-way transfer of funds proposed by Caltrans among several current or impending building projects in the county.

    SBCAG's proposal involves not only the Cold Spring Bridge suicide barrier project, but also the Highway 101 Ellwood-Hollister interchange project, the Highway 101 Milpas/Hot Springs project and three different sorts of funding. The proposed money swap begins with the transfer of $1.89 million in currently unavailable State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds from the Ellwood/Hollister project into the reserve of the Highway 101 widening project. The $1.5 million of stimulus funding—due to expire in February 2010—that previously occupied the Highway 101 reserve is then planned to go to the Cold Spring Bridge project, which would pass on its SHOPP (State Highway Operations and Protection Program) funding to the Ellwood/Hollister project.

    Not only are many projects and sorts of funds involved, but there are also a diverse range of interests tied up in Caltrans’s proposed fund swap. The Ellwood/Hollister project, a repair of Goleta’s Hollister Avenue bridge over Highway 101, is unanimously regarded as an excellent and probably necessary improvement that would positively impact Goleta. The suicide barrier project planned for Cold Spring Bridge is not so simply accepted by the public. Though on average one person per year jumps from the bridge to his death, some think that the potential diversion of one suicide per year is not worth the $1.5 million being transferred from the Highway 101 widening project that plays such a central daily role in the lives of most Santa Barbarans.

    Most of the public comments made voiced concern about what would become of the Highway 101 Milpas/Hot Springs project once the $1.5 million reserve was replaced with currently frozen funds. For some, the swapping of funds seemed to create the threat of a potential delay in finishing the Highway 101 project that, while underway, poses a threat to public safety and a traffic nuisance. For others, it seemed sneaky and potentially suspect for the SBCAG board to give its blessing to the convoluted swapping of funds—“that project needs to stand on its own two feet to compete for funding,” pointed out one speaker, referring to the suicide barrier.

    The most vociferous speaker against the suicide barrier project was Marc McGinnes, who has opposed its construction publicly since its inception. “The issue here is your judgment,” McGinnes told SBCAG board members, arguing that it was wrong to fund the suicide barrier with money intended to fund traffic safety. “What could you be thinking?” he asked, going on to say he was “amazed and appalled.”

    Later, in a phone conversation, McGinnes reiterated his qualms with the funding swap and the suicide barrier project, accusing SBCAG with “gambling” with funds. “Why don’t you all go to Las Vegas and stop gambling with these monies?” he asked rhetorically, suggesting that if SBCAG really wanted to divert the Highway 101 reserve, they could put it toward the Ellwood/Hollister project instead.

    Though members of SBCAG made a decision to pass the Caltrans proposal in June—a meeting that members of the public felt violated the Brown Act and cheated them of the opportunity to speak—there was still significant discussion on Thursday by public speakers.

    Ultimately, the board voted unanimously to go ahead with the shell game of exchanged funds that would result in what 1st District Supervisor Salud Carbajal termed a “win-win” for everyone.

    Related Links

    • More Cold Spring Bridge coverage

    Caitlin Crandell is an Independent intern.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Ugly and not worth the money.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 2

    JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
    July 17, 2009 at 9:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    >>>The proposed money swap begins with the transfer of $1.89 million in currently unavailable State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds from the Ellwood/Hollister project into the reserve of the Highway 101 widening project.<<<

    What do they mean, "currently unavailable"? Does this mean that there's a chance that the highway widening project just lost $1.89 million?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Kratatoa (anonymous profile)
    July 17, 2009 at 10:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Good call, SBCAG. Unanimous too... Indy really likes McGinnes; so much of his viewpoint presented, so little of opposing viewpoints. Words like `convoluted' and `shell game' used to describe the situation... Indy, please bury your bias a little better.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 3 • Thumbs Down: 3 of 3

    sevendolphins (anonymous profile)
    July 17, 2009 at 11:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Do you guys remember this story, when CalTrans told us they *already* had funding for this project?

    http://www.independent.com/news/2008/aug...

    People were worried that CalTrans was lying, and would eventually come after local transportation money to finish their barrier. And guess what ...

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Kratatoa (anonymous profile)
    July 17, 2009 at 9:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Well this is a dumb deal. Have local, state and federal governments not learned that you can't take from Peter to pay Paul. If a project doesn't have the cash the don't spend it. We as a state and a local area are in enough financial trouble.

    So one person on average a year jumps. If you really want to die that bad let them. I am sick of everyone trying to be uber PC. Suicide is not looked on as a bad thing in many societies. Why is it that we have to worry about it so much? Costs money to keep some one alive that doesn't want to be. Let that person be.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 2

    Thisislame (anonymous profile)
    July 18, 2009 at 12:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Cut services that assist the vulnerable,the youth, the elderly, the needy, the frail and build a barrier to protect people bent on self destruction? No sense to this.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 2

    samuel (anonymous profile)
    July 18, 2009 at 6:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    "Do you guys remember this story, when CalTrans told us they *already* had funding for this project?"
    -Kratatoa

    I'm not sure the Indy's reporting makes clear what the central funding issue is. Is it that the monies are there, but there are some timing issues on when they're available? Is this why swapping is going on? I'm confused. Some simple declarative sentences to set the scene before diving into details would have helped.

    Also, who is Marc McGinnes? This article and the referenced article don't say much about him. Is he a private citizen? Or does he represent an organization?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    EastBeach (anonymous profile)
    July 19, 2009 at 12:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    The old story I linked was about how the California Transportation Commission was threatening to take away the state money for the suicide barrier because it wasn't a transportation project. Back then Caltrans insisted that "funding was secure" for the project.

    However, a couple of months ago the CTC did withdraw funding for the barrier, just like they threatened. So, Caltrans is "borrowing" federal stimulus money from the County to fund the barrier, and has promised to pay it back if/when they get money from another state source. If that currently frozen money doesn't come through, the County is out $1.5 million.

    The timing issue is that the stimulus money must be spent by a certain date. I think many people would prefer that if the deadline to spend that money is approaching that SBCAG divert it to another local transportation project, rather than make up the funding shortfall for a state project and possibly not be paid back.

    Marc McGinnes is a local environmental lawyer and an outspoken critic of the suicide barrier project.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Kratatoa (anonymous profile)
    July 19, 2009 at 5:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Again less common sense than we need. I sure hope and pray Doreen Farr does not get reelected. We can thank her for the silly barrier. Again..."Bridges do not kill people....."

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    AndyG (anonymous profile)
    July 20, 2009 at 8:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Give us back the $1.89 million.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    loonpt (anonymous profile)
    July 20, 2009 at 9:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Common sense is to put a barrier around a high place where people could jump or fall from.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 2

    sevendolphins (anonymous profile)
    July 20, 2009 at 11:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    common sense would tell one not to walk where there is a high place you could fall from.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    spacey (anonymous profile)
    July 20, 2009 at 12:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Most high places have no human traffic. Thousands of people go over the Cold Springs bridge every day. An obvious place for a barrier.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 2

    sevendolphins (anonymous profile)
    July 20, 2009 at 6:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Yeah, thousands go over the bridge -- IN THEIR CARS.

    Genius.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Kratatoa (anonymous profile)
    July 20, 2009 at 9:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Yes, genius, thousands of people see the high, unprotected place from their cars each day. It's an advertisement for `Caltrans invites you to jump here.'

    Common sense says: build a barrier. The science is very strong: this will save lives.

    Just as the tobacco industry still says (particularly in third world countries) that the evidence is not conclusive that smoking kills, barrier opponents still say the evidence is not conclusive that a barrier saves lives.

    Per year cost of the barrier? About $100,000. Per year spending by the County on all mental health issues? About $40,000,000.

    common sense: build the barrier.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1

    sevendolphins (anonymous profile)
    July 21, 2009 at 9:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    So, not only are sevendolphins and snugspout the same person, but we now have confirmation that this person is also WINBILLS on EdHat. Note the cut and paste of the tobacco comment (comment #3):

    http://www.edhat.com/site/tidbit.cfm?id=...

    You should really mix up your message board spam more.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Kratatoa (anonymous profile)
    July 21, 2009 at 4:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Wrong, Kratatoa. Additionally, Randy Campbell requested you to cease your range war:

    http://www.independent.com/news/2009/jan...

    http://www.independent.com/users/randy/c...

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 2

    sevendolphins (anonymous profile)
    July 22, 2009 at 9:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    If it wasn't clear, my intent was to bring an end to the excessive back & forth between the two of you. No need for you to lobby on my behalf.

    -- Randy

    randy (Randy Campbell)
    July 22, 2009 at 9:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    No problem, Mr. Campbell. I don't think the exchange above is excessive. I also think there is a difference between attacking a poster, and making false accusations about their identity, and stating relatively impersonal opinions supported by facts.

    I also think the article your newspaper posted was remarkably tilted toward the anti-barrier view. Fine; you own it and have a free press. But if you provide this forum to comment, I'll use it, to point out your bias.

    But in the end, who cares. I think you only want eyeballs, and Kratatoas' inaccurate comments are not sticks nor stones.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 2

    sevendolphins (anonymous profile)
    July 22, 2009 at 10:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    You know those who are suicidal and aganist this project are just going to see this as a challenge. They are either going to climb, or bring bolt cutters..Whatever it takes your not going to take Cold Springs Bridge away from the hardworking, tax paying, suicidal reisdents of this county...I'm wondering if there's going to be a guarantee with this project. If someone jumps from this bridge after the project is finished is the money going back into the pot? Or is someone going to come up with another hair brainned idea that costs more money?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 2

    Byrd (anonymous profile)
    July 22, 2009 at 1:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    For the sake of keeping on track--and so that the thread doesn't get shut down-(as it did last time) we should keep the discussion on topic. It doesn't matter who blogs under what name, what matters is the ideas themselves.

    The one argument I can think of in favor of the barrier is that it may spare someone from *seeing* a person committ suicide, but if someone is so determined as go all the way to Cold Springs Bridge to kill themselves, then they will probably do the deed elsewhere.

    I have two friends (a couple) who witnessed a Cold Springs Suicide (I think it was the last one that occurred) and they were pretty freaked out by it so that mitigates to some extent my formerly 100% opposition to this proposal.

    Nothing else to say really, but I just wanted to add an angle that doesn't seem to get discussed.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    July 29, 2009 at 8:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together.

    I call for unity, and so do we.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    sevensnugkrats (anonymous profile)
    July 30, 2009 at 2:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    61.0°
    Wind:
    6 WSW

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    3. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    4. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    5. My Swine Flu Experience
    6. Teacher in Trouble
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.