POUND SAND: It’s been six whole days now since Travis Armstrong abruptly resigned as the News-Press’s potentate of the poison pen after nearly eight years on the job. In his wake, I figured I might a get a phone call or two. At least a nibble. Good help, after all, is hard to find. Besides, I already live here. I don’t have to be taught how to misspell and mispronounce most of the street names. I already know how to get them wrong. Yet my phone ringeth not. It mocketh me with its silence.
Angry Poodle
Aside from the astonishing upset of Measure B — the building height restriction for which we were repeatedly told that victory was inevitable and that no right-thinking candidate would dare oppose it — the biggest news of the political season has been Travis’s sudden departure. For many in town, Travis personified the unhappy hornet’s nest the News-Press has become. A few lines from Armstrong’s rant du jour could induce otherwise sane and sentient beings into sputtering seizures of outrage and indignation. Others regarded Travis as a slow-moving train wreck, and religiously picked up the News-Press only to see whom he’d cudgeled that day. As for me, Armstrong’s writing was a taste I never acquired. I did marvel at the guy’s sheer stamina, however. Even under the best of circumstances — which the News-Press hasn’t seen in many years — it’s hard to crank out that stuff. But to be held in such low regard by so many for so long must have been radioactive on one’s nervous system. Having only seen Travis in action at forums or hearing him on the radio, he never seemed equipped with sufficient body armor to take such slings and arrows. But then, he never seemed like the sort to dish it out so venomously either. There’s always been a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde disconnect between the ingratiating public face writers put forward and the true nasty selves only their keyboards witness firsthand. With Travis, the gap between these two encompasses time zones.
Because of this, many in town celebrated news of Travis’s departure like it was the end of World War II. While misguided in the extreme, the sentiment remains understandable. Travis took the old adage, “The personal is the political,” and turned it upside-down and banged its head until brain juice poured out the ear holes. You never could tell if Travis cared about his positions beyond the extent to which they offered him a handy excuse to excoriate public figures he just didn’t like. People who found themselves on the dark side of Travis’s moon discovered that the sun would never shine on their back door, at least where the News-Press was concerned. For example, Travis came to despise former councilmember Brian Barnwell. I never got it. I found Barnwell passionate, opinionated, and hilariously off-color. But Barnwell also had a genius for infuriating all sides of a given controversy. In journalism, that’s what passes for fairness; in politics, it’s called suicide. Hence Councilmember Dale Francisco’s upset victory over Barnwell two years ago. If Travis wanted to go after Barnwell as an elected official, however, that was certainly his business. But when he decided to drag in members of Barnwell’s immediate family, well, that was nobody’s business. Stunts like that revealed Travis to be more thug than ideologue. But, sadly for News-Press management, not scary enough to intimidate anyone effectively. It was only after Travis briefly was named interim editor three years ago that the News-Press mutiny achieved true critical mass. My pet peeve was how Travis insinuated some grave scandal without ever explaining what the scandal actually was. He’d frequently mention some traffic accident that some highly placed person at The Independent allegedly was involved in. Based on his columns, I never learned such trifling details as who, what, when, how, or so what. But whatever it was, I know it was bad.
Travis’s true genius, however, was in constructing mountains out of molehills. Mayor-Elect Helene Schneider’s husband — not Schneider herself — applied for a city permit to remodel the garage of the couple’s Westside home and thus became the subject of countless editorials. Ultimately, the project went nowhere due to cost issues. I never got it. I still don’t. But give Travis credit. By tagging the suffix “-Gate” to the prefix “Helene,” he manufactured the entirely imaginary scandal known to his readers as “Helene-Gate.”
As bad as Travis was, he never was anything more than the political id monster for News-Press owner Wendy McCaw. He was her voice, but she was always calling the shots. Well before Travis was a gleam in McCaw’s eye, the News-Press editorialized against the living wage, the minimum wage, and tenant protections. It already was vilifying Susan Rose and the rest of the county supervisors for ratifying a public easement — agreed to by one of the property’s previous owners — allowing people the right to walk along the beach at the base of McCaw’s Hope Ranch estate. It was well before Travis that the News-Press issued the now infamous “let them eat beans and rice” animal rights-inspired editorial, suggesting that, for Thanksgiving, Santa Barbara’s poor could forgo the donated turkeys offered by the FoodBank — then desperately trying to secure more birds — and sit down to a steaming plate of rice and beans instead.
Even with so many qualified journalists unemployed, I’m betting McCaw can’t find anyone willing to fill Travis’s shoes. Since Wendy has not yet seen fit to call me, I’ve decided to pursue Plan B. Maybe The Independent will hire Travis. Why not? After all, we hired former News-Press columnists Barney Brantingham and Starshine Roshell. Both of these writers, I should point out, kicked my ass in The Indy’s annual Best Of Readers’ Poll as favorite S.B. columnist. In my own paper, I can’t do better than third place. If we hired Travis, there might be someone I could hope to beat. In the meantime, maybe I’ll hire attorney Barry Cappello to demand a recount.
Related Links
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
If you're trying to be a political commentator, you should choose a large focus audience. Rush, for instance, has become a near billionaire by ranting to angry white male losers, which exist in huge numbers in this country. But if you are an angry alcoholic gay Republican Indian, your focus group is strictly limited.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 5 • Thumbs Down: 4 of 5
frankfrost (anonymous profile)
November 5, 2009 at 9:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Once again, partisanship rears its head in an otherwise nonpartisan discussion. Thanks, frankfrost, for demonstrating once again the reason that John Adams was against a two party system. One might argue that, 'angry gay man' would suffice to explain much of Travis' behavior. But that would sound like gay-bashing, ever so much more politically incorrect than Republican-bashing.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 4 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 4
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
November 5, 2009 at 9:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@John
Since Travis is gay (something I did not know until the recent articles of his departure), I see something in a new light: His opinions weren't really angry and vitriolic. He was simply being 'catty'. . . .
@Trixie
Perhaps, you can still hope for "Best in Show".
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
November 5, 2009 at 9:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
equus_posteriori...I love it! 5 years of private school Latin taught to me by unrelenting Jesuits finally finds a spot of humor in Santa Barbara. How about, "merda taurorum animas conturbit" or "vir sapit qui pauca loquitur?" Daniel Petry
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
jcrdan (anonymous profile)
November 5, 2009 at 12:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Recently, a commenter on another item claimed that criticizing Fox violated the network's First Amendment rights, and now JohnLocke thinks that taking a dig at a Republican is a hate crime. The list of right-wing grievances grows weirder.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 4 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 4
pk (anonymous profile)
November 5, 2009 at 3:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
By the way, my favorite Travisty, just before I tossed the NP for good, was a criticism of Lois Capps for blurring church-state separation by giving a speech at her alma mater, a Lutheran university. The editorial was completely pointless nonsense from beginning to end.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 2
pk (anonymous profile)
November 5, 2009 at 3:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think frankfrost perfectly illustrates the ugly side of our local progressive community, with his irrelevant (to the Travis Armstrong situation) rant about "angry white male losers." White males can do no right, unless they are self-hating progressives, and non-white males and/or females can do no wrong.
BTW frankfrost, you're supposed to use the diminutive coined by Houston Baker -- the "whitemale" next time you want to put the latter in their place.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 3 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 3
revisionist (anonymous profile)
November 5, 2009 at 8:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank goodness Travis Armstrong has left town. The man had no class. I can respect anyone if they take a position and defend it rationally. But to spread innuendo and defame people just for the sport of it, there's no honor in that. Armstrong was an adult version of a playground bully, plain and simple.
Ironically, that served McCaw's purposes well enough.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 2
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
November 5, 2009 at 11:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
pk, the issue with Fox News was not criticism, but the fact that the White House attempted to bar them from covering White House events.
I'd point you to to comment thread, but once I pointed out the original editorial missed the whole "barred from the White House" part of the story, the Independent deleted the entire story from their website ...
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 2
Kratatoa (anonymous profile)
November 5, 2009 at 11:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Krakatoa. The issue you point out was not the reason the former commenter claimed a first amendment issue--the claim was simply that pointing out the bias in Fox was the same as censoring it. Besides, the government "bars" lots of people from events--it's a simple issue of who should be considered to have a legitimate interest. If the White House denied you a credential to cover a news conference for your newsletter, would you cry censorship and claim that your constitutional rights had been denied?
My guess is that the Indie auditor went too far in inserting himself or herself into the argument about the article and someone got uncomfortable about it.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
pk (anonymous profile)
November 6, 2009 at 4:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Though I moved up here to Los Osos more than a year ago, I have kept careful track of the doings in Santa Barbara through the Independent online. I am delighted to hear that Travis has decamped to the desert where he can howl at the moon and foam at the mouth over the unacceptable behavior of the roadrunners. I suspect that Wendy will elevate some unprepared, terrified kid from the newsroom to express her continuing bad temper and twisted sense of entitlement. Thanksgiving is coming up, maybe she will entertain us with another screed against turkey consumption.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
fishpol (anonymous profile)
November 6, 2009 at 7:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Oooooh, do the happy dance!!! Ding dong the bitch is dead, LOL. I stopped reading the SB News rag over a year ago, and ol' Travis was definitely part of the reason. He terrorized people not only with his vicious pen, but verbally threatened some as well, promising to "run them out of town" and saying things like "I will destroy you." I know one person who began locking their doors, literally fearing this pathetic excuse of a man. Now, Wendy, won't you PLEASE follow Travis into the sunset and give us back our paper?
To frankfrost: "Gay Republican" ...isn't that an oxymoron?
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
crissyslucky7 (anonymous profile)
November 6, 2009 at 1:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
To frankfrost: "Gay Republican" ...isn't that an oxymoron?
Three words: Log Cabin Republicans.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 8, 2009 at 3:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I know this is totally unrelated to the discussion and I'm sorry. But I had to comment...The Mayor of Chicago, Daley, just blamed the Ft. Hood Jihad Massacre on America’s love of guns! So does he blame 9/11 on the our love of planes? Daniel Petry
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
jcrdan (anonymous profile)
November 10, 2009 at 5:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment