No Doubts, Boy Scouts
Is There a Gay God?
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Gay or Not Gay? If you’re thinking of becoming a Boy Scout, as the movement celebrates its 100th anniversary, be sure that you are not gay and harbor not the slightest doubt that God exists.
And if you do get in, and you have a gay sexual orientation, or have any doubts whatsoever about the deity, make sure Scout leaders don’t find out, or you’re liable to be booted out.
Barney Brantingham
As the Scout organization made clear upon winning its 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2000, which said that it’s a private organization and can ban gays, Scouting’s First Amendment-protected “expressive message” includes opposition to homosexuality.
Ironically, according to Tim Jeal’s biography, British war hero Lord Baden-Powell, who founded Scouting, was a repressed homosexual.
Scouting contends that among its main concepts, in building character in young men, is support for the concept of God; so it bans atheists and agnostics along with homosexuals.
So I got to pondering, what exactly is an agnostic? Just someone who doubts the existence of God? Not that simple, according to theologians and philosophers down through the ages.
If you’re a 12-year-old boy and find yourself confronting this question, you’re liable to find yourself digging through loads of lore, ranging from Greek philosophers to British thinker Thomas Huxley, who coined the term agnostic. As our boy gets deeper into the puzzle, he may learn that according to Wikipedia, there are a half-dozen or more degrees of agnosticism, including the belief that the existence of God is simply unknowable, as in, “I cannot know whether a deity exists or not and neither can you.”
Then there’s the “I don’t know whether any deities exist or not, but maybe one day when there is evidence we can find something out.”
Then there’s something called “apathetic agnosticism,” the view that there’s no proof of either the existence or nonexistence of any deity, and since any deity that may exist appears unconcerned for the universe or the welfare of its inhabitants, the question is largely moot.
There are also the agnostic atheists who don’t claim to know of the existence of any deity and don’t believe in any. Then there’s “spiritual agnosticism,” the view of theists who do not claim to know of the existence of any deity but still believe in such an existence.
There are still more variations on the theme. By then, our 12-year-old might either be thoroughly confused, or be able to say that he is some version of an agnostic, or that he harbors absolutely no doubts about the existence of God. (At least until he turns 13 and continues to ponder the question that has troubled thinkers for centuries.)
The high court agreed with Scouting in the 2000 case that accepting even one gay (specifically James Dale, the New Jersey Scout and Scout leader who made a federal case of it) “would derogate from the organization’s expressive message” of opposition to homosexuality.
Chief Justice William Rehnquist, writing the majority opinion, said that the mere presence of Assistant Scoutmaster Dale “would, at the very least, force the organization to send a message … that the Boy Scouts accept homosexual conduct as a legitimate form of behavior.”
But, critics of the court argued, the Supremes took a different tack in the 1980s when all-male organizations like the Rotary Club fought to keep women out as members. The clubs contended that they had a First Amendment right to exclude women, but lost. In the Dale case, by contrast, the court ruled that the Scouts had a First Amendment right to exclude gays.
Well, as we all know, when judges want to justify something that’s hard to justify, they can find a way. In the Dale case, the court said that opposition to women was not a prime aspect of being a Rotarian, but that opposition to homosexuality was key to Scouting. In response, one of Dale’s lawyers said the decision “requires [Scouting] to declare yourself an institution with an anti-gay message, and we don’t think there are many organizations in this day and age willing to declare themselves as that.”
In the decade since, society has changed so much that same-sex marriage has been legalized in some instances. The country has moved on, but Scouting has not.
As for me, my happy Scouting days back on the South Side of Chicago were untroubled by such issues. We were not grilled on our particular personal variation of agnosticism, if any, or whether we were obeying our “duty to God,” whatever that might be, as required by the Scout Oath. In it we promised to be “morally straight,” by which, I now learn, Scouting means “heterosexual.”
Despite all this, I know of Santa Barbara gays who sailed through Scouting as boys and loved it. Back in Chicago, we simply learned to tie knots and send and receive Morse code by flags, and went camping. Our scoutmaster was a stern commandant who taught us a lot. When he said the accusation that he exposed himself to a little neighbor girl who wandered into his basement was false, we believed him.
Related Links
Barney Brantingham can be reached at barney@independent.com or 805-965-5205. He writes online columns throughout the week and a print column on Thursdays.
Comments
A new low, Barney.
Have you nothing more "portentious" to write about?
Leave the poor kids alone!
maximum (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2010 at 12:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
And PS the more the gay movement insists on thrusting itself all over the rest of us, the more we DO notice them (as different.) Most of us keep our sexual preferences to ourselves in the spirit of TMI (and we really don't care what your preference is! Live and let live!)
It reminds me of the Jesus freaks in the 70s. Enough already!
maximum (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2010 at 1:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Barney,
Dude, why you got a be such a hater? You do your thing, let them do their thing.
loki143 (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2010 at 11:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Ironically, according to Tim Jeal’s biography, British war hero Lord Baden-Powell, who founded Scouting, was a repressed homosexual." "Ironically," or "coincidentally?"
"We were not grilled on our particular personal variation of agnosticism..." "Grilled," eh? Is that what they do now Barn?
I cannot forget the progressive leadership role that grown ups took that one day that the scouting kids were jeered at during the 4th of July parade on State St. Amazing people........
azuresees (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2010 at 6:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Identity politics, special interest gender-based politics, read between the lines people. Barney and his ilk are part of the rending of the fabric of America--the country you and I still love. Of all the "heterosexual" men I've met who attended boy scouts not one of them is homophobic or a "hater." Most of us truly do "live and let live."
Why can't you?
Barney, get hot or go home. (Here's your suitcase...)
maximum (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2010 at 9:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Maximum, the only people I hear clamoring as loud as you are homophobic, are you comfortable with your own sexuality? Take a look at what sexual repression has done to the Catholic Church and lack of education has done to the STD and pregnancy growth rate.
Interesting subject but the point I got was why, in this country that was built on religious and ideological freedom, do we allow groups to demand that we all believe the same way? What freedom are we sending those boys and girls off to war for? Someone’s profit and the right to impose religious dominance?
The strength of this country is that we are a melting pot and our success depends on our ability to take advantage of the need to work together to maintain the high ideals and goals of our forefathers. This country was not based on the belief that we must all be white, 6’2”, blue eyed blondes, another country has already tried that and it doesn’t work.
We are still an experiment as a social model in history’s eyes and I hope we can find the tolerance necessary to continue to grow.
Thanks Barney, great job.
joerak (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2010 at 11:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Boy Scouts of America discriminates in their membership and employment based upon the religion and sexual orientation of current or potential members and employees.
Facts are stubborn things.
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
March 13, 2010 at 3:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yo, y'all have no idea what my beliefs are... But here's a great solution to all that ails you:
The Gay Scouts - no more worries there
The Gay Atheist Scouts - even clearer
Muslim Air - no body scanning worries, etc. If they blow each other up, oh well...
This IS a free country. And many of us are tired of being persecuted by noisy special interest groups.
FORM YOUR OWN G-DANG GROUPS and get over it!
maximum (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2010 at 10:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You claim to believe in "live and let live" but you don't want certain types of people to actually ask for the right to be let to live without discrimination. And what makes you think that only other people have "special interests" but you don't?
Rending the fabric of America? Thrusting themselves all over you? Persecuting you? Calm down, max.
pk (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2010 at 11:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm so excited I'm going to _______
Fill in the blank.
Love to see what you come up with....
maximum (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2010 at 12:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
In the platonic dictionary that resides somewhere beyond the highest heaven, next to the entries for "human being" and "American" is a picture of max, the paradigmatic member of both species. Everyone else is a deviation from the ideal type, a special interest that assaults the perfect, neutral, objective set of cultural attitudes he represents. It's a lonely and perilous place, under attack on all sides, but he's steadfast in the calm and measured expression of his pure, disinterested vision.
pk (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2010 at 7:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
pk - when I was in gradeschool a boy in class cut a foof... the entire class said "feel better now?"
I can't say it any better...
maximum (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2010 at 11:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I know you can't. That's your problem.
pk (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2010 at 7:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Touche! Feel better now?
maximum (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2010 at 1:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I was a boy scout until I was 18, and a cub scout before that. In my 10+ years as a scout I don't remember anything about religion ever being talked about, never mind anyones sexual orientation.
At 13 years old, being gay or worrying about Jesus just doesn't cross your mind. You want to camp, play games, shoot a bow and arrow, row a canoe, roast marshmallows and be a kid. If you kid is more worried about sex and religion at that age, ya, I'd say they had a problem beyond the boy scouts.
But hey, if you are a parent and think the boy scouts are an evil institution, don't let your kids participate. I'm sure that will help them later on in life.
All their friends were doing something, but Mom and Dad wouldn't let them. Then the poor kids go around wondering what they did to make Mom and Dad keep them away from the scouts and their frields. Way to go overly politically correct morons! Thanks for making another damaged person for the world to have to deal with...
bronc (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2010 at 2:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hatred is not letting little kids go camping (or learn archery or navigation, etc) with other little kids because they are different in some way, be it orientation (or perceived orientation) or their parent's religious beliefs or lack thereof. Pointing this out is not hatred. Any child that is deliberately kept from situations where he/she has to learn to get along with other people who are not like he/she is being put at a disadvantage. The real world awaits and there are all sorts of people in it.
dana33 (anonymous profile)
March 17, 2010 at 12:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I find it disturbing that the poor kids walking up State St during a 4th of July parade ( a few yrs ago) were subjected to jeers and boos by the people who claim the corner market on tolerance.
They kicked those children out of their discounted building in Manning Park, then laid into them during the parade. Hell, they ain't responsible for the BSA policies. But in typical Santa Barbara hippie (read Solstice sycophants) fashion, they took the brunt of the loud-mouthing by the activists on the curbs of State St.
I believe the justification of the eviction was due to a non discrimination policy by SB county. Fine; it's a private organization and as such, they can get the boot. But mature people wouldn't have attacked the children, but would have taken on the policies of the organization.
If I'm not mistaken, the same crap happened to our returning military in the Viet Nam war. Loudmouthed a-holes take it out on the draftees coming home. What an ugly corner to own in the market of tolerance.
azuresees (anonymous profile)
March 17, 2010 at 7:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Would those who think the government should interfere with the Boy Scouts' decision also be the same people who cry about "separation of church and state"?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
April 6, 2010 at 6:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)