Don’t Say ‘Gay’
Tennessee Tries to Outlaw Talk of Homosexuality in Schools
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
It’s the love that dare not speak its name—especially if you’re in Tennessee, where it could land you in jail.
The state’s Senate just passed a bill that would make it illegal to teach about homosexuality in public schools from kindergarten through 8th grade. No gay-marriage chatter. No gay-rights banter. No gay gayness of any gay sort.
Dubbed the “Don’t Say ‘Gay’ Bill” by opponents, the measure insists that any instruction or materials provided to students on the subject of sexuality must be “limited exclusively to natural reproductive science.” Teachers who violate the rule could be fined up to $50 and sentenced to as many as 30 days behind bars.
Starshine Roshell
Supporters say the bill allows parents, rather than teachers, to decide when and what (and, er, if?) their children learn about homosexuality. As if they didn’t actually learn all they need to know from watching Modern Family.
But to me, the whole gay gag just looks like a bunch of uptight Republicans trying to squash a squirrelly little slice of reality that makes them terribly uncomfortable. And maybe just the slightest bit tingly.
Similar to the military’s misguided and recently repealed “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy—or even the Hogwarts posse’s reluctance to speak Lord Voldemort’s name—this bill assumes that if you don’t talk about something, it will go quietly away. You can almost see the poor, terrified lawmakers skipping maniacally around the halls of the capitol, fingers jammed in their ears, singing, “La la la, I can’t hear you, gays! La la la …!”
Apart from being profoundly silly, the measure is also utterly unnecessary. “Gay lessons” aren’t part of any grade-school or middle-school curriculum. Third-graders don’t analyze the gender identity of Judy Moody. Seventh-graders don’t delve into the homoerotic subtext of Huckleberry Finn, although maybe they should. If the subject comes up, though (I’m looking at you, Oscar Wilde), shouldn’t it be addressed?
If this bill is approved when the House finally votes on it next year, Tennessee will be the first state to have such a law. (According to the Associated Press, California and Washington both struck down similar bills within the past decade.) But it wouldn’t be the first to censor school curricula; raise your hand if you got a prettified version of the Holocaust and the Vietnam War. And some states—are you kidding me?—still aren’t sure whether to allow evolution theory into textbooks.
The worst thing about this bill is that it’s dangerous. Outlawing the discussion of any subject sends a clear message that the subject is unacceptable and doesn’t belong at school. Questioning your sexuality? Don’t bring that freaky burden to class. Have two moms at home? Keep it to yourself, kids.
Perhaps Tennessee lawmakers have been too busy overturning Nashville’s new gay-friendly anti-discrimination ordinance (oh, yes, they did) to notice that gay teens in this country have it lousy. Most are bullied, many are depressed, and some have killed themselves as a result. While everyone from President Obama to Ke$ha is making “It Gets Better” videos to encourage gay teens to be optimistic about their futures, the great Volunteer State (what kind of a nickname …?) is telling students, “Sorry, It Gets Way Worse Before It Gets Better.”
If these lawmakers had been better educated themselves—had been drawn into a smart and safe discussion about homosexuality back when their minds were still open—maybe they’d be more concerned with educating kids than sheltering them. More determined to hush hate speech than to muffle knowledge.
I don’t know how to reverse ignorance and intolerance. But I do know this: They don’t go away just because we ignore them.
Related Links
Starshine Roshell is the author of Wife on the Edge.
Comments
Don we now our gay apparel.
EZK (anonymous profile)
June 1, 2011 at 1:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"I don’t know how to reverse ignorance and intolerance. But I do know this: They don’t go away just because we ignore them."
Nice job, Star. You should get your leftie, anti-soccer mom gumption on more often. It becomes you.
niceFLguy (anonymous profile)
June 1, 2011 at 3:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
its the job of schools to make students into good citizens by teaching them to uphold and give equal protection to that which has been deemed legal.................such as homosexuality.
how can the schools do that if they are prevented be teaching the goodness of being gay, which means discussing not the sex but the bonding of same sex couples, who in bonding provide loving nuturing homes for raising children in the same way as do heterosexuals.
feetxxxl (anonymous profile)
June 1, 2011 at 5:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
At last you have revealed your "spunk" as a writer of substantive material and done it well. I applaud you for stepping out of the box to deal with a subject that has been closeted too long as another form of discrimination.
Shep (anonymous profile)
June 1, 2011 at 9:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So, are the schools still churning out functional illiterates?
As for sexuality, you're either programmed that way or not, and it simply should be a non-issue either way. Teach the facts about pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, (which can be accomplished in one hour followed by a question/answer period) and get back to teaching kids the skills needed to function in the real world.
Politics have no place in the schools.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
June 2, 2011 at 3:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Two steps forward, and one very big step backwards... yikes. Thanks for the great reporting Starshine
sbsurfguy (anonymous profile)
June 2, 2011 at 12:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I was going to question your assumption that this was a Republican thing, because frankly I've seen some dumb stuff from Dems too, but you're right.
According to the vote: http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillI...
And checking party affiliation:
http://www.capitol.tn.gov/senate/memb...
It was along party lines, save one D voting aye (Burks).
Rich (anonymous profile)
June 3, 2011 at 1:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Outstanding, as usual, Starshine! All the fear about homosexuality and banning any teaching about sexual orientation comes from MISUNDERSTANDING. Those who don't want their children to know about homosexuality are afraid that it might be catching, that hearing about two males who love each other or two females who love each other, might give their child ideas. Sexual orientation is well established before children are born. The children may not know that they have a "same sex" orientation until they start feeling sexual attraction, but it is not something any of us have a choice about. We are gay or straight or bisexual, and most people who realize that they are gay feel safer not to share that about themselves until they find a supportive atmosphere. Fortunately young people today have a better understanding than their parents' generation and it IS getting better, but not fast enough for those gay kids who would rather be dead than face the bullying from hateful and often religious groups. Let us teach understanding, acceptance of diversity and love and celebration of all human beings. Marian Shapiro
Shira (anonymous profile)
June 3, 2011 at 1:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Respectfully-
"what kind of a nickname …?"
Really?
Just from the two words, I would assume that Tennessee provided a remarkable number of volunteers (as opposed to draftees) for World War Two. Turns out it was actually the war of 1812, according to THE FOURTH RESULT ON GOOGLE for "Volunteer state".
I hope the caps are not too offensive, but I see people in this comment thread congratulating you on writing "substantive material." While I agree that the law under discussion is worse than stupid this column, when judged as journalism, falls severely short.
In the heat of emotion over one stupid thing a particular group of people have done recently, you allowed your contempt for those people's modern conduct to lead you to heap scorn on an unrelated facet of their history. Simply because you didn't know the context for that fact and (apparently) didn't care to learn.
If you call that journalism, you have a future at Fox News. It's not okay to do that because you're standing up to injustice. Everybody thinks they're the good guys. Journalists do their research.
In this case, what you flippantly dismiss in a parenthetical is something many would consider quite honorable: service to one's country.
As opposed to, you know, Googling it.
Next time you write an impassioned treatise on any subject, if I may, I'd like to offer a suggestion: Complete your rough draft, save it to your hard drive, then go make yourself a cup of tea and go to a completely different room than the one in which you write. Slowly drink your tea. Maybe listen to some music.
When the cup is empty, come back and give your text a careful read-through. Does anything pop out to you as unfair? How about just clumsily written? If neither, you probably either need more tea or weren't very outraged in the first place.
In the heat of passion it is very easy to come across facts one does not understand, and feel like one's own confusion is a valid reason to criticize.
This mistake is much harder to make on a belly full of good tea.
-Cheers
Clay (anonymous profile)
June 4, 2011 at 2:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Clay: What proof do you have that Starshine didn't do her research on the article? (Assuming you're not Starshine herself or one of her supporters having a good laugh on us)
billclausen (anonymous profile)
June 4, 2011 at 3:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What proof do I have? Is that a joke?
First of all, "proof" a damn silly idea in this context. But let's review the bit of the article in question:
"While everyone from President Obama to Ke$ha is making 'It Gets Better' videos to encourage gay teens to be optimistic about their futures, the great Volunteer State (what kind of a nickname …?) is telling students, 'Sorry, It Gets Way Worse Before It Gets Better.' "
Potential rewrite:
"While everyone from President Obama to Ke$ha is making 'It Gets Better' videos to encourage gay teens to be optimistic about their futures, Tennessee is telling students, 'Sorry, It Gets Way Worse Before It Gets Better.' "
The bit I take exception to:
"the great Volunteer State (what kind of a nickname …?)"
...which, as I've shown above, you can excise entirely without harming the piece. It is an aside, entirely irrelevant to the main point. It is also a mistake.
When I suggested that Starshine hadn't done her research I was being charitable. I laid out a hypothetical in which she, in the heat of emotion, made an uncalled for remark motivated by her own ignorance.
But you're right. It's also entirely possible that she knew Tennessee provided a record number of volunteers for our nation's military during the war of 1812, and simply decided that regardless of it's origins, the name sounded stupid.
Which is fine. It doesn't really matter what motivated the question. Even if it was rhetorical, I still feel someone must answer it.
"what kind of a nickname …?"
The kind earned by the sweat, blood and tears of American soldiers and their parents back at home. That kind.
Clay (anonymous profile)
June 5, 2011 at 2:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)