Back in mid April at a Board of Supervisors’ meeting, 2nd District Supervisor Janet Wolf expressed dismay over the fact that the county wasn’t going to have any budget workshops — early opportunities to discuss potential service-level reductions — leading up to the hearings scheduled to get underway next week, during which the board will decide on an $844-million operating budget for fiscal year 2011-2012.
“We are planning to sit idly by with our hands folded for almost two more months before we are permitted to offer our input or direction?” Wolf asked. Waiting will leave little time to pursue ideas or suggestions, she said. When she was board chair last year, the board held meetings early on in the calendar year and was able to give then-CEO Mike Brown an indication of what their priorities were heading into June.
But she received no support from other supervisors this year, and so the board for the first time next week will figure out how to deal with what is, according to first-year CEO Chandra Wallar’s office, a $72-million deficit. “It was disappointing not to have that support,” Wolf said. Other supervisors have said the meetings last year were less helpful. “This year we’re going to try to solve the problem in a much more strategic fashion,” 1st District Supervisor Salud Carbajal said.
Wolf is afraid that policy decisions are being made by county staff, not the board, leaving just three days next week for the supervisors to leave their own fingerprints on this budget. By comparison, the city, which has a total operating budget of about $254 million, has had nine budget sessions since mid April, with two more scheduled during the next two weeks leading up to the planned adoption on June 21. Instead, Wolf said, she’s had to set up meetings individually with department heads throughout the weeks, getting answers to her questions while at the same time studying the budget book. “Even though we didn’t have these hearings, it’s important for me to know what these recommendations are,” she said.
Indeed, the 664-page document is chock-full of depressing proposals for the county piggy bank every time you turn the page. Some have already been highly publicized, like the potential closure of the Santa Maria jail or the defunding of the Human Services Commission and the $1.2 million it provides to 65 nonprofit programs throughout the county. Pro Pay, a county payee service which receives government checks on behalf of 300 people — often those with substance-abuse and mental-health issues — would lose its funding, much to the chagrin of homeless and social service advocates. The Sheriff’s Department staffing levels could drop to what they were in more than a decade ago, and the DA’s Office could lose its drug and alcohol court prosecutors, meaning more people will be forced into criminal courts instead of getting help and treatment. The budget also recommends grounding the Fire Department’s aviation unit.
What is known for sure are costs associated with the increase in salaries and benefits. The Board of Retirement has fixed the contribution rates for the coming year, and the county is looking at an increase of $20.7 million to stabilize the pension fund. Labor concessions agreed to in years past will also be expiring, adding $9.2 million to the deficit.
The fat has long been trimmed, and has been so for a few years now. There are no Band-Aid fixes left, the county having implemented a soft hiring freeze since December, and various furloughs over recent years. Now, layoffs (289 positions total, 130 or so currently filled) and services are being targeted. The potential of union concessions could mitigate some of the damage, though there have still been no announcements of any deals with labor organizations. Discussions with most labor groups are ongoing.
But none of the ideas have been vetted publicly by the supervisors. That comes for the first time next week, much to Wolf’s dismay. “I don’t know how it’s going to work this time,” she said.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace




Previous Month



Comments
This is the same Janet Wolf that voted for unaffordable compensation increases for county employees. I'm sure she had NO idea that those increases were unaffordable. Riiight.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
June 9, 2011 at 8:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
She's right about this, squeezing everything into three days. The city of SB does it much better with a process extending over months, with time for public comment and discussion.
at_large (anonymous profile)
June 9, 2011 at 11:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well, how long have they known they needed to do a budget? Not like it just occurred last week. They've had grim forecasts for months. SO why didn't she push for earlier/longer hearings? What a loser.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
June 10, 2011 at 8:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Janet needs reminding of a few facts, not the first time either. First, staff submits their recommendations. The Board of Supervisor reviews and changes. They vote, they set policy, not the department heads. Under the current weak CAO format, they (she particularly) micromange and get very involved in individual department operations, since the Dept. heads have gone from true professionals to lackeys. You can rest assured she has been poking her head into the office of the finance director at every opportunity, so her comment that she hasn't had time to provide input is inaccurate to say it nicely. She and the rest of the BOS have quarterly updates and have had the opportunity to make comments and revisions there as well throughout the year.
Would a couple of public meetings been helpful? Doubtful.
The mess the County is in is due directly to the policies enacted by this Board majority, which has been very well notified by staff as to the pending fiscal cliff they are fast approaching. They've known for 3 years. They would like the public to forget this little fact. The hard decisions should have started then, not all at once like now. Instead of showing leadership and hiring top notch fiscally sharp department heads, their first go around is to hire a Parks Director with a sketchy fiscal background (audacious $60,000 mileage claim at former job) and poor relations with his staff (ask any ranger you see in a parks uniform). They voted for a pool in Cuyama that costs over $180,000 a year to run for 4 months and serves less than 40 people a day. No major concessions by the general employees union (who gave her over $100,000 in previous years for her campaign). Salud is no better....monies given to him by general employees union is almost as high. The general employees make up the largest union in the County.
Too bad. Our County is fast becoming a fiscal joke more akin to comparisons with Orange County of the 1990's, which had to declare bankruptcy, than to San Luis Obispo, which has managed far better with fewer resources.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
June 10, 2011 at 9:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Budget sessions are for public participation. The lady is trying to do the right thing here, people. Want to assign blame? How about Michael Brown for not managing the money better when there was money. Hey, some of my best friends are public agency employees. Quit blaming them for everything!
BongHit (anonymous profile)
June 10, 2011 at 9:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey, Mike Brown, and I wasn't a huge fan.....did not pass any budget, warned this group of this impending cliff, recommended union concessions years ago, only to have this board majority back down and agree to deferrments. The quarterly adjustment items are always on the agenda and open to public input. I know lot's of public employees too, most of them are parks staff and they are great guys and gals who love their jobs but hate their current leadership. Worse director since Terri Nisich. My civics may be rusty, but it's the elected officials, not staff, that adopt and pass budgets. Take another bong hit.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
June 10, 2011 at 10:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Perhaps Janet Wolf can explain why she allows county staff - specifically Terri Maus Nisich, assistant CEO with no public portfolio, make decisions about executive management in county departments. Why did she and the Board let Ms. Nisich hire someone with a questionable background to be interim parks director and then make no public announcement about the appointment? You can't have it both ways, Ms. Wolf, delegating tasks that are unpleasant or controversial and then complain that staff are making all the decisions. And on a second point, why do we need an Assistant CEO like Ms. Nisich after she was a failure at running the parks dep't and has no discernible skills (HR, budget, etc.) Why have her appointment (by Mike Brown) duties, salary, and performance received no scrutiny?
totheeditor (anonymous profile)
June 10, 2011 at 1:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Amen to that. Ms. Nisich makes over $180,000 and for what exactly???? Be Janet's lap dog at her bequest? I agree with you on the appointment. So much for the hypocrisy of this majority yelling for open government and then turn around and make silent appointment of worthless staff.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
June 11, 2011 at 9:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)