Santa Barbara homeless advocates are preparing to push back hard against a collection of proposed program cuts when the Board of Supervisors continues its hearings tomorrow, June 15th. Though hearings into the county’s fiscal year 2011-2012 budget began on Monday, June 13th, Wednesday’s discussion will cover a greater array of programs that help and serve the area’s homeless, almost-homeless, and mentally ill.
The list of cuts that will be talked about includes the following: 1) The payee program Pro Pay that serves 300 mentally ill residents incapable of handling their finances. 2) Warming Centers, which received $51,000 from the county last year for bad weather shelters for the unsheltered homeless people. 3) The Veteran’s Services program, which helps the county’s 1,300 or so vets access VA benefits. 4) Cuts to the Human Services Commission, which itself funds a bevy of nonprofits that directly serve the local needy and homeless residents.
Potential impacts of these cuts include the deterioration of living situations of hundreds of people teetering at the edge of society, including the 300 souls served by Pro Pay. According to the director of PathPoint, many of these people will not be able to pay their rent and other essential bills with their small government checks because they will have already spent it, or most of it, by the time it’s due. To read more, see homelessinsb.org.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Not to be insensitive, but there is no money in the coffers. Hopefully, the electorate remembers it's this board majority, empowered for 3 years, that is directly responsible for not handling this mess better. Unfortunately, the people that need services the most will be hardest hit.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2011 at 4:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I hope the County will let the public know how they might be able to help, through voluntary donations, to support things like Pro Pay. And I hope they will preserve some minimum administrative elements supporting the program -- the parts that would be needed to support at least a temporary shift to donor funding, especially small donations from a public appropriately informed of the need.
OldDawg (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2011 at 6:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Necessity is the mother of a lot of things, including innovation. Perhaps those in the non-profit and community-based organization world can collaborate with the Public Guardian's office to save the essential Protective Pay program. Sadly, as many counties and municipalities have learned, when programs such as Protective Pay are targeted due to budget shortfalls, the burden is shifted to other institutions, including hospitals, jails, and the beleagered courts. Applications for conservatorships rise, and government agencies are then legally "on the hook" so to speak to provide institutionalized care, the monetary cost of which is staggering; not to mention the human cost in personal suffering.
Perhaps our electeds can collaborate in lieu of cutting; appoint innovation-minded representatives from stakeholder groups, and preserve essential programs like Protective Pay. Pro Pay services can then be provided by one or more of our many non-profit agencies across the County, with guidance and oversight provided by staff designated by a Board-appointed "Disability Support Network".
The fact remains that representative payee services are a necessity for many of our disabled citizens, Santa Barbara County can choose to establish a demonstration project for others to immitate. .We can choose to preserve and reduce the cost of administering these life-saving services, and be rewarded for our efforts a thousand times over.
As my grand daddy used to say "where there's a will, there's a way". And there's some wisdom is that old saying.. Somehow we can see it better with a little different lens.
graysondale (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2011 at 9:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You all realize nonprofits are suffering too? This program would cost $202,200 for the County to restore. The Board of Supervisors can do this if they want to.
LC (anonymous profile)
June 14, 2011 at 11:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)