Assemblymember Das Williams recently proposed legislation to tax certain California strip clubs at a rate of $10 per customer. The money would fund programs that treat victims of sexual assault and human trafficking, and help pay for forensic rape kits.
It would be up to the clubs to determine how they pay, whether by taking steps to increase profit (i.e., creating a cover charge, upping drink prices, etc.) or simply absorbing the cost. The tax, however, may not be passed to the entertainers, the bill says. “There is a clear nexus between alcohol consumption and violence against women,” Williams said in an interview with The Sacramento Bee. “This [bill] only affects those that serve alcohol.” The two gentleman’s clubs in Santa Barbara County — the Spearmint Rhino locations in the City of Santa Barbara and Santa Maria — don’t serve booze and wouldn’t be affected.
Said the former Santa Barbara councilmember in a prepared statement, “There is a clear and urgent need for funding for effective delivery of services and care for women who have been sexually assaulted. To date,” he went on, “the precedent has been set by the Texas and Utah legislatures, and other states are examining this funding stream.” He explained that California rape crisis centers helped 29,929 victims in 2011, with the state’s General Fund contributing only $45,000, or around $1.50 per victim. While federal dollars previously paid for the bulk of these services, rape crisis providers recently took a 25 percent cut in national funding.
Williams’s camp has so far been unable to say how much money the proposed pole tax could generate. His staff is trying to figure out exactly how many strip clubs there are in the state and are challenged by the rules and regulations that differ from city to city, he said. “The precedent set in others states definitely is inspiration for this piece of legislation,” Williams said in an email to The Santa Barbara Independent. “However, the need for a funding source for rape crisis centers came to me from the local rape crisis center through their state organization, because they know my legislative background in fighting for women’s issues.” The bill needs a two-thirds majority approval in both houses of the California Legislature to pass.
Williams said he hasn’t heard from any club owners about his idea but said the bill shouldn’t be a big source of worry for them. “This is not a make-or-break tax for these businesses,” he said in the email. “Even in tough economic times, strip clubs are not hurting for money.” Club owners and operators in other states have challenged similar models of the “pole tax” in court, arguing it violate the clubs’ free-speech rights and seriously hurt their bottom lines.
Officially called the “Sexually Orientated Business Tax,” Williams’s bill, for its purposes, defines nude as either entirely unclothed or “clothed in a manner that leaves uncovered or visible through less than fully opaque clothing, any portion of the genitals or buttocks or, in the case of a female, any portion of the breasts below the top of the areola.” A sexually orientated business, it goes on, is a nightclub, bar, restaurant, or similar establishment that “provides for an audience of two or more individuals live nude entertainment or live nude performances.”



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
If Das would spend just half the time he spends on thinking up new taxes on cutting government spending we might actually get somewhere.
Sorry, I can not support any new taxes
loneranger (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 1:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Stripping is a business, one that survives on customer satisfaction. Making me pay more to see a stripper will affect the stripper any way you look at it. I imagine if Das had any business experience he might know that.
BBOY (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 3:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
BBOY: "I imagine if Das had any business experience he might know that."
But he doesn't, soooo... Well Santa Barbara, you got what you voted for: Tax & spend poster child.
It ain't over yet, more new taxes to come soon, compliments of you know who :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 4:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Too bad there is no way to tax politicians...
BondJamesBond (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 6:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If we're going to use this kind of logic then we should be charging each Frat and Sorority house in IV about ten grand a year.
DarkMarcsun (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 6:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There is a clear nexus between alcohol consumption and violence against women,” -Das Williams-
According to what I read in one police report, the connection is about 50%, yet from what I hear from the inside, Das is a supporter of the downtown bar scene.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 8:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
'Fighting for women's issues'....Das???? Are you effin' kidding me? Only when, just like strip clubs, he can exploit them for gain. This is a total crack-up: let's tax a business that exploits women...and say we're helping women! From the SacBee (much better reporting on this than the recently lame Indy): "Men will continue to go to strip bars," he told the Bee. "And you know what? They'll feel better about it because they'll be funding a needed service for women." Totally. Tone. Deaf. Totally. I wonder how Susan Jordan and Janet Wolf feel about the way Das fights for women's issues.
dogsnsand (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2012 at 10:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"I wonder how Susan Jordan and Janet Wolf feel about the way Das fights for women's issues."
I couldn't say for sure, but party loyalty usually comes before personal ethics.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 2:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Maybe Das can dance naked and we can call it a draw.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2012 at 8:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
While most of us are goofing off; representatives such as Das Williams are hard at work trying to get services restored after disastrous anti-progressive policies of the conservative parties.
I received a mailing from Assemblymember Das Williams regarding scholarships. You can view or sign up at MiddleClassScholarship.com
Now who could be against that.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 5:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
And here he goes again. What's that you say Don? "Conservatives"? "Progressives"?
By the way, how'd that "progressive" sweep of the SB City Council go? Yeah, not so good huh?
Same old story, same old song & dance, my friends (Aerosmith some time in the 1970's) :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 9:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let's see -- middle class scholarships paid for entirely by closing a wasteful out-of-state corporate loophole... I'd love to see what those loopholes are? Are we going to charge income tax on out of state corporations that sell into CA? And then NY will tax CA corporations that do business in NY. Interesting that nowhere on the web site do they define what these 'wasteful loopholes' are.
I guess we are just suppose to believe what we are told and not ask question!
Will the last revenue earning entity please turn off the lights when they leave California. There will be no one left to pay the electric bill.
loneranger (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2012 at 9:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It's time for Das to get the Boot.
BeenThereDoneThat (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2012 at 2:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If booze leads to the problem, then why not tax all the businesses that serve booze?
This is a creative political art to impose taxes where the demand is steep (as "strip clubs" selling booze are imagined to be), rather than where the problem originates that needs to be remedied or overall where the money really is, such as all places that sell booze.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2012 at 7:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The clearer nexi remain the link between testosterone poisoning and the inability of male reprobates to exercise self-control.
This tax idea is just another example of a bad idea in a world of bad ideas. Congrats, Das! You're our moron of the day!
Draxor (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2012 at 10:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Feminism, Inc. has been cut back on the federal gravy train, so all those extreme feminists are scrambling to keep their fat salaries running scam "rape crisis centers" that do little but claim they do a lot. Williams is just pandering to the lefty voters, as usual.
zorro (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2012 at 9:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
John_A: "If booze leads to the problem, then why not tax all the businesses that serve booze?
Great point there, but I think zorro nailed it on the head:
"Feminism, Inc. has been cut back on the federal gravy train"
"Williams is just pandering to the lefty voters, as usual."
The math actually adds up on this 1. It is NOT a common sense idea by Das Boot (thanks for that Been There), just a politically savvy idea in the name of pandering :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2012 at 10:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I believe in a progressive Nudie Tax. $3 per breast, (add $1 for each increase in cup size) a tax break if the implants are environmentally friendly, and $10 per buttock...the maximum...er maximus (as in gluteus maximus) tax.
fivedolphins (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2012 at 1:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)