Comments by info
Page 1 of 2 | Next
0 of 1 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on September 30 at noon
Hi Kratatoa,
Now I am almost on the hook. Well, we will use a third party who gets the money from you and we meet and I show you the certificate and I buy the three of us a cup of coffee afterwards. If you want, we can take this to a personal email for the details and then after this is over, you can tell people whether I lied or not.
0 of 2 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on September 30 at 9:55 a.m.
Hi Kratatoa,
You seem like a nice person. You also are smart to know that things cost money and in this case for the title it will cost you $250. But we are almost at the deadline and I doubt I hear from you in time.
0 of 1 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on September 28 at 9:19 a.m.
No it does not. But that is what it will cost you since you asked to see it. This offer is good until 5 p.m. on 9/30/2009 as I have already spent enough time discussing this.
0 of 1 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on September 25 at 9:01 a.m.
Kratatoa, I do not care if you are CIA or not. I do see that you have a sense of humor and couple of your "funny" posts were funny. I do not need to cover my name on my certificate ;=) But since you are interested I will be happy to prove to you that I do have one but only if you put your money where your mouth is. For $500 (two hours of my time) I will spend the time and prove it to you.
2 of 3 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on September 21 at 9:26 a.m.
Dear duetc and others,
You are giving more credit to SezMe than she/he deserves. Just read her/his replies to many posts and you will see what I mean. I will not waste any more time on replying to SezMe. Take care.
2 of 4 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on September 21 at 9:24 a.m.
SezMe not only counters all claims/opinions that are not what he/she likes/believes, but also makes fun of one of the highest ranking accredited universities in the United States!
And as to her/his statements:
"The towers do not look nor sound like controlled demolitions." First it should say did not and not do not. Second where did he/she hear what she/he refers to as sound? Who recorded the sounds close to the buildings when they were coming down?
"NOBODY in the building demolition business thinks the bigger the building the more room for error" First is he/she in the business of demolition to make such a statement? and Second, if so did he/she get a vote results of which is such a statement?
I will not comment any more as I would not get into a battle with a witless individual. If SezMe wants though he/she can show an independent volunteer her/his valid accredited high school credentials and I will show them my PhD. ;=). Bye bye SezMe.
2 of 4 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on September 18 at 9:03 a.m.
I have a PhD in Mechanical Engineering (disclaimer). I was in NY until 9/10/01 and returned to SB that day and watched the horrific event on my TV (general info). As soon as the first building went down I turned to my special one and said "Oh they brought it down" because it takes science and perfect execution to do such a demolition and this looked exactly identical to them. And then the second building and then the third! Then I was curious in what will be presented as the root of the terror as well as the cause of the buildings coming down. I was shocked and disappointed at the “official” statements on why the buildings collapsed. I have no idea why they were brought down and do not care for conspiracy theories as almost all are baseless but science is just that and when anybody specially the government and NIST try to change and make exceptions to science it turns my stomach.
You can see all of the scientific proof and what NIST and others say to try to counter them and they fail. Because of my background I understand all of the points and counter points. But let me try to present a simple lay person way of looking at this.
To bring a much smaller building down (demolition) it has to be properly and exactly calculated on where to put the explosives, what order to explode them... so essentially a process that has to be exactly and correctly followed for the building to fall in (instead of falling out). The larger the building the more room for error so it has to be done with more calculations and again perfect execution. You cannot have these towering magnificent buildings collapse the way they did without a controlled demolition with the footprint we saw. Unless it is David Copperfield’s magic. It is kind of like saying all bullets go straight but suddenly I shot one bullet that went straight, hit one person, then suddenly curved and hit another person and then curved again … because yesterday was a very hot day with high humidity at 2:31 p.m. and it was a Tuesday of all days. Just does not happen folks.
1 of 1 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on November 14 at 11:28 a.m.
What a sad event. He was a wonderful man. I met him over two years ago when he was the principal at the Monte vista school and he took care of us (new to school) as nice as he did of the returning students and families.
He was so focused on enriching his students' lives by providing wonderful extra-curricular activities including music and it was very sad to see the other members treat him the way they did and force him to resign. I do not know his life outside of Monte Vista but based on what I know this wonderful man was put under a lot of undue stress while all he wanted was to provide the best environment for our children and community.
This is a very sad event for our community.
Posted on December 12 at 2:25 p.m.
1-I see a common theme among the supporters of the original article which is: U.S. is benefitting from supporting Israel. You can talk about MIGs, intelligence… but they are all weak. Is there benefit to US by supporting Israel? Yes. Is the benefit worth it? Absolutely not. Comments (by pmf) like 3 out 4 U.S. supporters do not always vote with US are ridiculous. Since when supporting means you agree 100% with the other person? Which points more to the problem at hand which is U.S. has (almost) always vetoed any U.N. resolution against Israel. U.N. stands for United Nations. Means representation of all of the countries in the world. This has to be wrong as nobody; even Ms. Betty can state that all of the nations in the world are (almost) always wrong. Pmf, your assertion that Israel has helped U.S. military tech as a justification for U.S. aid has more holes than Swiss cheese. BTW, I like all kinds of cheeses.
2-Dansome1, you state Israel does not oppress Palestinians because of their own victimizations in the past. OK. Then you say Israel used to let Palestinians have water, electricity, jobs… Fact is Israel took land that was occupied (not vacant) by terrorizing the Palestinian villages. Fact is that today Israel releases a few hundred Palestinian prisoners while arresting a few thousand. Fact is that each Palestinian gets a small fraction of the water that an Israeli gets. Fact is that many many things that Israel does are against basic human rights and condoned by many many nations.
3-Billclausen, you should re-read before commenting. I did not state Israel is responsible for suicide … and rather Israel’s actions help the problem. As for Al Q, they leverage the one-sided (wrong) U.S. support of Israel to achieve their demonic goals. I do not support any human being or organization killing another whether it is through killing self or through tanks and jets and missiles. However I do make distinction between those with superior power (Israel in ME) who use their power to impose their will to create what has been referred to as Apartheid with no regards with human rights. Where did I hear this analogy? On LinkTV talking about the concept discussed with Archbishop Desmond Tutu.
4-Amico, Radical Islam along with many other reasons is largely empowered because of lack of proper dialogue and support between U.S. and Moslem nations and the U.S. unequivocal support of what Israel does.
5-For Ms. Betty, well I am not going to comment because of her level of logic and knowledge. She should keep reading diverse viewpoints and keep on learning as we all do.
6-Sb2ny, I appreciate your re-reading of my original note and I accept your apology.
I like the people who are solution-minded and can and do at least try to see it from the other side’s point of view especially if they are on the side of power. BTW, what do you folks think about the following sources? www.linktv.org, www.democracynow.org, www.ifamericansknew.org?
Page 1 of 2 | Next
Previous Month
0 of 2 people thought this was a good comment.
Posted on September 30 at 4:33 p.m.
To Kratatoa,
My offer to show it for free was to SezMe and only if he showed his high school diploma. You cannot piggyback on an offer. For you it'd cost money and that was before you got upset and started using this kind of language and re-accusing.
Also a Paultard is someone whose claims cannot be tested/verified. My claims can easily be verified. However, your claim above (They probed my butt! An Alien Abduction Story) I would say is challenging to prove but you may be able to do it so I would hesitate to call you one (BTW I am not interested in your proof). LOL I am sure you are even madder now and if so you should control your anger.
Take care.
P.S. I think the rest of the readers had fun (I hope). You all take care too.
P.P.S. If I make a claim and someone doubts it they have to pay a price for their challenge. I would have donated this sum to the charity of the loser's choice (in my name!) so thanks for your offers to do it for free/$10 but I do not suggest how you do things and I do not do what you suggest.
On The Elements of a Great Scientific and Technical Dispute