Page 1 of 5
Posted on June 6 at 5:10 p.m.
10 to 1 the PAP already knew the problem existed, from the very recent PIG test. This would explain why they are being so outwardly nice, but actually defensive. Shut the pipe down, it is worn out.
On Red Dogs in the Sunset
Posted on June 6 at 4:37 p.m.
With so much corrosion on this pipeline, is it really wise to start it back up? Perhaps it has reached its useful life expectancy.
On Political Reaction to Refugio Oil Spill Continues
Posted on May 30 at 5:16 p.m.
We need smaller frogs, not a bigger pond.
On City Sales Tax Pursued
Posted on May 30 at 5:13 p.m.
Spend all your time raising money for re election while waiting for horse to leave barn. Show up late and slam barn door. Time for new senators.
On Senators Demand Answers About Refugio Response Delays
Posted on May 30 at 5:06 p.m.
So far, the only industry singled out for elimination because of the drought is the pool builders. While obviously, a moratorium on new water hookups is in order. I too, am aghast at the growth and zoning decisions Goleta is making. Private property rights in California are largely controlled by zoning ordinances. None of these are set in stone. If you want to keep an eye on what Goleta is doing, monitor the planning commission. These are the guys that have the real power.
On Do You See What I See?
Posted on May 27 at 9:28 a.m.
Great infomercial. Can I go next?
On The Shocking Truth
Posted on May 21 at 4:26 p.m.
Nick, you are truly amazing, thank you. The oil companies always lobby hard for limited regulations. Then, when an incident occurs, they declare loudly that they were following the law. The same thing is going on with fracking. Mark my words, 10 years down the road when the groundwater is all contaminated with fracking chemicals, the drillers will announce their strict adherence to all regulations. How can a pipeline company operate without leak detection alarms? Ludicrous.
On Huge Oversight Gap on Refugio Pipeline
Posted on May 20 at 9:04 a.m.
Goleta does not care about the agricultural community. Goleta would rather the agricultural community dry up and go away so that the unbridled growth of the city can continue unabated. Hey Goleta, watch out, you reap what you sow. Can you say San Jose?
On Water Is Life
Posted on May 9 at 1:14 p.m.
The solution to this and many of the housing woes in California is the rezoning of single family to allow for second units. This provides affordable housing, retirement housing, child care housing, or perhaps some cash income to help pay the taxes. The single family, white picket fence model we have used since Levittown after WWll, creates unsustainable transportation, land coverage, infrastructure and security pressures, and breaks up the historically extended family. This leaves parents to have to pay for childcare and retirement homes instead of utilizing the wisdom of the older generation to help raise the children. It adds to security as there is more often someone on site, it provides a spot for the hated short term and coveted long term rental, and doesn't require new construction. We have too long based our economy on this ill conceived, actually accidentally adopted model. Now, all together: NOT IN MY BACKYARD!
On Vacation Rentals Take Homes Away
Posted on May 9 at 1:02 p.m.
Hey Ernie, Sounds like typical Santa Barbara self entitled, liberal NIMBIism to me. If you were actually concerned with the effect of housing on the fabric of society, you would be lobbying for a zoning change. I refer to making all "legally constructed" second units legal. This would provide, affordable housing, security, and a better answer to the fractured nuclear family. Home owners could use legally constructed second units to rent, or for live in child care, for extended generations, grandma and grandpa, or to make a little cash to help with the increasing tax burdens of living in CA. This little solution also decreases the need for further expansion, a process that needs to end in CA. Now, all at once, Not In My Backyard!