Welcome to a new and improved version of our Santa Barbara Media Blog, which we intend to be a weekly look at the goings on at various media in Santa Barbara. The original Santa Barbara Media Blog was born out of the News-Press turmoil of summer 2006, and became one of the most popular facets of Independent.com in the early days. We let it slip away many moons ago, but now we’re bringing it back, reenergized and ready to rock the mediascape.
From personnel changes and lawsuits to controversial topics and national attention about a local issue, this blog will be a quick, easy-to-read report on some of the media happenings around town - from radio to online to television to print, including critiques of our own publication when appropriate - and should help keep ourselves and other media accountable. Since our eyes and ears can’t be everywhere at once, please feel free to shoot us an email at news@independent.com with tips for the blog. Enjoy.
* Our first week of doing this certainly had plenty of oomph to it, mostly thanks to Daily Sound columnist Gina Perry. Perry’s column from last Thursday - and the paper’s editor and publisher Jeramy Gordon subsequent apology - has struck a chord both locally and in media circles outside.
If you hadn’t heard, the conservative pundit Perry, who’s certainly no stranger to stirring up controversy, stirred it up once again when talking about President Obama last week. Check out the last two lines of her column: The most dangerous extremist in this country is the one running it. Perhaps a bounty should be put on his head.
The Daily Sound issued a statement the next day, and took a beating in the Letters section of Tuesday’s paper, though to their credit they published the letters, all of them critical of Perry. Said letter writer Milt Hess: “I hope the Secret Service pays a visit to Ms. Perry - and to the Daily Sound - to explore the legal ramifications of publishing such material.”
Though the story was taken off the Daily Sound’s website, we have it for you, thanks to Google cache. Gordon published an apology in the paper and online a week later, saying there was no excuse for publishing the article. “The column is indefensible and the proper measures have been taken to ensure such hatred is never published again.” Gordon explained that Perry is not paid, and that, “[r]ather than yelling about what a dimwit Perry is, and threatening to never read the Daily Sound again, readers should write in with their own columns, just as Perry has.” Response to the article has shown there is no shortage of opinions. The apology note had 95 comments on it as of Friday afternoon.
Journalism watcher Jim Romenesko at Poynter Online picked up on last Thursday’s highly controversial column. Elsewhere, the blog Daily Kos and media watcher for the L.A. Times James Rainey both commented on it, with Rainey explaining, “Big trouble when a paper has to print this ‘Even if the assassination of our president wasn’t [the] intended meaning’.”
* A News-Press story with the headline “Floating Floats cruise waterfront for annual Parade of Lights” was a nice description of the event along Stearns Wharf Sunday. It even mentioned the event’s judges - Santa Barbara Councilwoman Iya Falcone, Yacht Club Commodore Homer Smith, the Harbor Commission’s Bill Spicer, and KTYD’s Julie Ramos - and quoted three of them. What you might not know is there were actually five judges on the panel, but one was left out of the story altogether. And who was that, you ask? None other than The Independent‘s own Starshine Roshell, a former employee at the daily. Coincidence?
Here is the line for those that don’t subscribe to the paper: Sponsored by many local businesses, including the Santa Barbara Waterfront Department, Santa Barbara Bank & Trust and the Santa Barbara Yacht Club, the event’s judges included Santa Barbara Councilwoman Iya Falcone, Yacht Club Commodore Homer Smith, the Harbor Commission’s Bill Spicer and KTYD’s Julie Ramos.
The newspaper did issue a correction, saying Starshine Roshell was not mentioned as a judge in the Parade of Lights. Ms. Roshell was a judge at the event. We regret the error.
* AOL financial website walletpop.com recently ranked Isla Vista the number one most dangerous neighborhood for property crime. Using some sort of crime data developed by a Dr. Andrew Schiller, as well as FBI data, the website says that out of 60,000 U.S. neighborhoods, your property has the best chance of disappearing in Isla Vista. Lock your cars!
* Uber-cyclist and Tweeter Lance Armstrong was in town Friday to promote his book. He got into town a few days early, and even headed up Gibraltar Mountain, though no word on whether he biked up there. Check out all his updates here.
* USA Todaygave a brief shout out to the Canary Hotel as a place where booking a hotel room early can pay off.
* Last week’s Angry Poodle in The Independent, was, in part, based on the premise that Assemblymember Pedro Nava’s name, when translated, meant “the stone who swims.” The only problem: It doesn’t. The Poodle wasn’t too far off with Pedro, but, as many who studied Spanish would probably know, he was a little further off with Nava, which actually can’t be translated to any Spanish word.
Here’s the Indy’s correction in this week’s paper:
Pedro Nava does not translate to “stone that swims” in Spanish. The Poodle essentially mispronounced the Spanish verb “nadar,” which does mean “to swim,” as the nonexistent Spanish verb “navar.”
We couldn’t have said it better ourselves.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
The issues surrounding Gina Perry's opinions and the obligation the Daily Sound seems to feel to publish them have been thrashed out on the Sound's website ad nauseum. One awaits with no enthusiasm the contempt-filled insults about to follow here. May the Lord of good sense and civil dialogue only prove me wrong.
pk (anonymous profile)
December 19, 2009 at 1:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How dare the Independent link to this article. You're now just as liable as the Daily Sound for spreading this hate. Even more so because you continue to spread it. The sound at least is trying to get past this unfortunate instance. Reposting this column is in such bad taste. I thought you were above that. I hope the Daily Sound sues you like the News-Press did when you posted one of theri stories. Readers should be just as outraged at the Indy's poor decision to repost this junk as they were at the Sound's poor decision to publish it in the first place.
JimDurrier (anonymous profile)
December 19, 2009 at 2:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There's a difference between posting junk because, like the Sound, you think it's worth having people read it and posting junk because, like the Indie, you think people have a right to decide whether the organ that published it originally was behaving responsibly.
pk (anonymous profile)
December 19, 2009 at 2:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There has been a lot of scuttlebut and talk about this article and for those who did not see it, it is good for readers to see it for themselves. As it has been on the internet, I don't think, Mr. Durrier, you are going to get your hope fulfilled. I think that the Indy is just putting out the source so people can make a judgement based on the actual article and not what other people say about it.
I think this should also have a link to the wimpish apology letter. This is really interesting fodder. The comments of those who are backing Perry are almost frightening.
bajamama (anonymous profile)
December 19, 2009 at 3:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"conservative pundit Perry, who's certainly no stranger to stirring up controversy, stirred it up once again when talking about President Obama last week. Check out the last two lines of her column: The most dangerous extremist in this country is the one running it. Perhaps a bounty should be put on his head"
This is not an ordinary conservative pundit, this is a whack job extremist whose comments clearly violate any spirit of "free speech".
If Obama were to suddenly resign his office and leave politics, would this woman's anger subside?...were the Karl Rove haters happy when he left office?...are those people at odds with Wendy McCaw reconciled with News-Press management now that Travis Armstrong has left the building? Nothing is likely to change if he were no longer president so what this women needs to do is to mount a logical response to his policies--but her call for a "bounty" indicates that she cannot. When people feel threatened by ones message, they either call for violence, censorship, or resort to name calling.
Any time a new president gets elected, party-line ideological opponents will say that this person has a radical new agenda when all they are doing is following the party line. If a person has differences with someone based on political ideology, then they should examine the facts which will lead them to mount a good argument, or to admit that they are unsure of what they believe, or even admit they are wrong.
Lest I be accused of being an Obama shill, I did not vote for him, but any call for violence--and from what I'm reading this is what this woman is calling for--is not only morally wrong, but a violation of the American spirit of freedom.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2009 at 3:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Nominee for the most ironic, non-self-aware comment ever written: Gina Perry, from a previous column: "I wonder when personal attacks replaced rational debate as a form of valid communication."
pk (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2009 at 7:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
El Poodle enojado no sabe como utilizar un diccionario. Tal ves no debe estar escribiendo por un periodico. !Que Tanto!
greensoftshell (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2009 at 9:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
whoops "tonto" not "tanto"
greensoftshell (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2009 at 9:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Tal ves no debe estar escribiendo por un periodico. !Que Tanto!"
"Tal ves" is spelled tal vez, but otherwise you have excellent Spanish-language grammar.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2009 at 12:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Simple, you get what you pay for in the Daily Sound when it's from free columnists whose only want is to foist their opinion and BAD English on readers. Wonder if the DS ever read the column before it was published.... stay with the reporters you pay PLEEZE... it will help your profile as well. I miss Cheri Rae - pay her and bring her back !!!
MediaPro (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2009 at 12:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)