• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Paul Wellman

    Renters’ Rights: Estela Jaimes (with her daughter) was evicted from her apartment last year so her landlord can make improvements and increase the rent. Activists like Belen Seara (right) say stronger protections are needed.


    Stronger Relocation Rules Pushed for Displaced Tenants

    Flexing Muscle


    Thursday, July 9, 2009
    By Nick Welsh (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    In a rare display of political pulchritude, a group of tenants’ rights advocates gathered outside the County Administration Building early Tuesday afternoon demanding that supervisors stiffen the rules governing how much relocation assistance landlords have to provide displaced renters and under what circumstances.

    Under the county’s eight-year-old ordinance, landlords must provide relocation assistance only when their tenants are forced out because their homes have been deemed uninhabitable. Advocates with the Rental Housing Roundtable—a coalition of tenants’ rights supporters—argued the ordinance should be expanded to include renters forced to seek new accommodations because of condo conversion, demolition, renovations, and rezoning. When families are evicted, they must often double up elsewhere, said Sharon Rose of Mobile Home Owners Coalition. “And that’s really hard on the children,” she said.

    By comparison, the City of Santa Barbara has an ordinance requiring landlords to pay up to $5,000 to tenants forced to relocate because of condo conversions or habitability problems. City housing officials said they did not know how many times that ordinance has been used.

    Organizers acknowledge the statistical record is sketchy but say four mass evictions since 2002 have displaced no less than 300 families. In these instances, the tenants were evicted to allow for renovations and improvements that enabled the landlords to charge substantially higher rents. In one high-profile 2006 case, Isla Vista families occupying 50 units were evicted to make way for luxury student rentals. Almost always, the affected households are low-income, Latino, and families.

    Belen Seara, coalition spokesperson, said landlords should give tenants enough money to cover the first month’s rent plus a security deposit. County supervisors Salud Carbajal and Doreen Farr have recommended the issue be referred to the county’s Housing director John McInnes for further study.

    “You pass an ordinance, but if there’s no oversight and follow up, it falls through the cracks,” Carbajal said.

    Clouding the debate is the absence of reliable statistical information. Under the existing ordinance, the landlords are supposed to notify county housing officials whenever they serve an unlawful detainer notice to evict tenants. Those records, charged Seara and Carbajal, have not been kept. “You pass an ordinance, but if there’s no oversight and follow up, it falls through the cracks,” Carbajal said. McInnes, however, claimed otherwise, stating that some landlords have complied with the law. Without such information, argued Leon Lunt of the Santa Barbara Rental Property Association, “There’s no basis to suggest there’s even a problem.” Lunt suggested 5 to 8 percent of South Coast rentals are currently vacant. Landlords are so desperate for tenants, he said, they’re offering one-month rent free to renters willing to sign a year-long lease.

    “There may be rental units on the market,” countered Seara, “but they’re not affordable. And that’s a big difference.” She cited the situation of Estela Jaimes—on hand with her two-year old daughter—whose family was one of 32 evicted from Modoc Road apartments last summer. With three kids and an injured husband, Jaimes said, she’s moved twice since being evicted. Even in today’s softer real estate market, she said, rents for comparable accommodations are $300-$500 higher than her Modoc Road home. To pay the first month’s rent and a security deposit, she was forced to take out a loan. Seara said Jaimes’ experience is hardly uncommon.

    “It’s been a long time since I attended a gathering where so much hyperbole and exaggeration was presented as the truth,” claimed Isla Vista landlord Charles Eckert, who also conceded, “Even hyperbole and exaggeration usually contains some kernel of truth.” To the extent there’s a problem, he said, it was the fault of out-of-town real estate investors who haven’t been “housebroken” yet. Eckert cautioned that “too draconian” a solution might scare some landlords out of the rental market altogether or inhibit others from making needed repairs.

    The supervisors took no action Tuesday out of deference to Fifth District Supervisor Joe Centeno, who could not be present. The matter will be formally debated in August.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    It is expensive to live here and people paying below market rent need to plan for the day when they will have to pay market rent and prepare accordingly. Failure to plan on their part should not create problems for others.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1

    El_Informador (anonymous profile)
    July 9, 2009 at 11:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    With three kids and an injured husband, Jaimes said, she’s moved twice since being evicted.

    This might sound insensitive, but why not leave the area? Just about anywhere is cheaper than SB, so why stay and torture yourself?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1

    Carpreader (anonymous profile)
    July 9, 2009 at 9:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    First of all, SB is a city, not a private club, so y'all need to either get used to living alongside poor and working class people, or get on some good meds so their existence won't freak you out so much.

    Secondly; I'm about done with the "Latinos and Families" mantra. This stuff is happening to everyone everywhere, and it's no fun for anybody. Try being 80 years old or disabled and finding yourself evicted; now THERE are two groups of people who are well and truly screwed no matter what they do...the elderly and the disabled. They can't play the race card or the kid card. They're just screwed.

    And nobody cares.

    The fact is that when you rent, you have nothing. The rent trap is simply as follows: a property owner lets you borrow the property for a fee... which can change at any time, and you can be kicked off that property at any time. There is zero security in being a renter. Renting is a fool's paradise.

    The sooner people wake up and realize that more laws aren't going to fix this problem, the better. There has to be real competition in place before landlords are going to realize that their product just isn't all that valuable and the tenant market needs to be courted, rather than continually ripped off, then vilified by the "if you can't afford to live here, get the hell out" crowd.

    Some solutions are mobile home parks with entry-level-priced, modest manufactured homes which can be purchased, along with an interest in the park itself, like a resident-owned co-op. No landlords, no renting, no nonsense. Eligibility would be income-based...and not for people making 75k a year, either, but more like the working stiffs who are gasping along on what passes for a living wage in this area.

    No" programs", poverty pimps, "social services" or any of that other nonsense where overeducated parasitic twits "administer" things, feed off the desperation of others, and cherry-pick "consumers" to "receive benefits".

    Just regular folks who work, or who are on Social Security, trying to get by in their OWN HOME TOWN, where frankly, they DO have every right to live.

    And, (Gasp) how about an RV campground where residents are charged a rent based on their income, so motorhomers can get off the streets, and work towards the above mobile home park and ownership?

    Instead of whinging about people living in vehicles on the streets, or people who can't afford thousands of dollars in monthly fees to occupy housing at the whim of a landlord, start offering realistic and humane solutions.

    If you gripe, then you have to offer a real solution, and "get out of my personal Eden" is not a solution; it's the screeching of selfish brats who don't want anyone else to have anything at all, while they hoard everything for themselves.

    Grow up and learn to share, kids. It's really NOT all about you.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    Holly (anonymous profile)
    July 10, 2009 at 1:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    "Almost always, the affected households are low-income, Latino, and families."

    Ah yes, let's politicize poverty along racial lines, and of course, for "the children".

    Here's the reality check folks: "low-income" is all that you need to describe the problem. Maybe if people claiming to speak for all the disenfranchised would quit pulling the race card and also realize that those who haven't performed the biological function of having a child are among those left out financially, something good could come of this.

    It doesn't matter what color your skin is or whether or not you're part of an officially oppressed demographic, because poverty crosses all these lines. Was Eleanor Rigby a woman with children?...

    If one is truly concerned about the plight of the poor/working class, then they should realize that poverty does not discriminate along racial lines or familial status.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    July 10, 2009 at 5:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    I am a "Latina" and a single parent, born and raised in SB. However, when I realized that I could not afford SB, I moved to Santa Maria. While it may not be exactly where I wanted to live, I can afford to raise my kids, own a good size home and have some money left over.

    I have to agree with some of the above, SB is not a club and if you can't afford the rent, simply put MOVE!! That is all there is to it, move out of SB and have a more affordable life. My house payment is still less than rent for a 3 bd house in SB.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    m2457 (anonymous profile)
    July 10, 2009 at 11:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    This proposed County ordinance essentially would make the same rules apply there as already exist in Santa Barbara City.

    The rental market still works fine in the City with those rules in place. The market clears. Profits are made. Commerce and trade continue. The sun also rises.

    Santa Barbara never will have enough housing for everyone who wants to reside here, but at least maintaining the rental housing stock we already have is good public policy that local government can do something about.

    And that is Change we need.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
    July 10, 2009 at 3:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    54.0°
    Wind:
    6 W

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. Gardens of Rare Books
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.