The Ortega Reservoir, which holds treated water for the Montecito and Carpinteria Water districts, is leaking out its bottom at a rate of 50 gallons a minute. In hopes of abating the flow, Montecito district officials had emptied the four-acre holding pond for the months of March and April. Just last week, they had the reservoir refilled.
The leak has become the subject of litigation between the Montecito district and engineering contractor Penfield & Smith, as well as with Cushman Construction. The leak sprung shortly after a four-acre cover was affixed to the 21-million-gallon facility — at a cost of $18.5 million — in 2007. The cover was installed in order to make Ortega Reservoir comply with new federal water quality requirements that aim to prevent carcinogens from forming in the water when sunlight hits leaves, branches, and other particulate matter suspended in chemically treated water. In addition, the cover maintains the potency of chlorine disinfectant added to the water.
Because of the leak, the district will fill the reservoir far less than its holding capacity; this could have significant impacts on the district’s ability to serve customers, particularly in hot summer months when water consumption for Montecito’s lush expansive lawns increases. Efforts to fix the leak — first using scuba divers and then by emptying it — have proven fruitless thus far. The reservoir, while operated by the Montecito Water District, is owned by the federal Bureau of Reclamation which is monitoring the situation to ensure that the leak does not undermine the structural and earthen foundations on which it rests.
The Ortega Reservoir is important because it holds water treated at the Cater Treatment Facility — owned and operated by the City of Santa Barbara — so it can then be distributed to customers in Montecito and Carpinteria.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
I am an avid reader of your newspaper. I do get a little tired of the snide comments that generalize about Montecito residents though. Regarding "expansive lush green lawns"... many of us have NO lawns and mostly native or native adapted plants. Not everyone here has a mansion, give us a break!
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
beachwalker (anonymous profile)
May 28, 2009 at 12:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh, so government regulations make my water taste more like chlorine? To prevent carcinogens now?? Great. TREE LEAVES AND BRANCHES in treated water + sunlight = carcinogens.. who would have thought..
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
loonpt (anonymous profile)
May 29, 2009 at 9:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
loonpt: chlorine is used a disinfectant. Chlorine + sunlight reacts with organic compounds such as tree leaf particles to form nasty THMs -- trihalomethanes. Chlorine itself is bad enough but THMs are worse.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Olegario (anonymous profile)
May 29, 2009 at 2:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Efforts to repair the leak have been fruitless, the leak may be undermining the foundations, Montecito and Carp may not have enough water, and... ???
Are residents footing the bill for all this treated water that is draining away? Anyone know why the leak can't be fixed? Anyone know why the leak sprung in the first place? Bad engineering? Faulty materials? What are the allegations in the lawsuit? Is there no solution in sight?
Please, someone finish the story!
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Nitz (anonymous profile)
May 30, 2009 at 12:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment