Dressed in rumpled orange and blue County Jail garb and clad in hand and ankle cuffs, Peter Jeschke-the former Santa Barbara High School tennis coach convicted in May of several counts of having sex with and giving intoxicating substances to a minor-was sentenced on Monday by Santa Barbara Superior Court Judge Frank Ochoa. To the surprise of Joyce Dudley, senior deputy district attorney, who has been on the case since it began in December 2007, Ochoa elected to go against the probation officer’s recommendation of prison time, and suspended the maximum sentence of seven years and eight months, instead placing Jeschke on probation for five years. “This is a difficult and troubling case. It’s clear that Mr. Jeschke abused a position of power,” said Ochoa, noting that what most swayed his decision was a statement submitted to the probation officer by the victim’s mother, in which she essentially stated that the ruination of Jeschke’s reputation and career as a professional tennis instructor was punishment enough. She had also expressed concern over the welfare of Jeschke’s five-year-old son.
Paul Wellman
LAST-DITCH EFFORT: Peter Jeschke was out on bail leading up to his trial but was remanded into custody when police traced a threatening Facebook message back to him that had been sent to witnesses on the eve of trial.
Jeschke, whose eyes seldom left the floor during the hearing, displayed no emotion as his sentence was read, although the many friends and family members who turned up seemed relieved. A handful of his detractors showed what appeared to be signs of disgust, with one woman hissing, “Unbelievable!” just after the pronouncement was made. Although it is unclear whether or not the statements she made prior to sentencing had any impact upon Ochoa’s decision, defense attorney Lara Yeretsian implied in her commentary that due to the nature of his crimes, Jeschke would face sexual abuse if he were to go to state prison. “I felt that this judge did the right thing,” she said. Yeretsian had also collected numerous letters of support from friends and family members, submitting them to the probation officer responsible for making a sentencing recommendation, as well as ordering a Static-99 -a specific psychological examination to determine an inmate’s risk of repeating sexual or violent crimes. The test results indicated that Jeschke is at extremely low risk of committing similar crimes in the future.
Paul Wellman
Although he dodged prison time for now, the former high school tennis coach faces charges of witness intimidation and supplying drugs to minors.
Discussed at length during the sentencing hearing were the impacts Jeschke’s actions allegedly had upon the victim, her family, and the Santa Barbara High School tennis team. “I felt that he was deserving of a prison sentence based upon his criminal behavior and the effect that it had not just upon his victim, but on the entire community,” said Dudley. An emotional statement by one of the victim’s friends-a former team member who had testified that Jeschke had given alcohol to her and other girls on the team-told of her feelings of betrayal that she said led to her detaching from friends and losing interest in the sport. The victim’s mother said that her daughter seldom agrees to talk about the incident, although she is currently seeing a therapist.
Jeschke is not yet out of the woods, though, as he still faces nine additional charges, including witness intimidation counts racked up when he talked a former high school tennis player into sending threatening messages to witnesses during the trial, the day before the girls were to testify. The added charges carry the possibility of 10 years in prison. “In my 27 years on the bench, I haven’t ever had someone try to manipulate the process as Mr. Jeschke did,” said Ochoa. It will be a while, however, before a decision is made-a preliminary hearing for the new charges is scheduled to be heard by Judge George Eskin on December 9-but Jeschke, who has already served more than 300 days in County Jail, may be eligible for release fairly soon.
Related Links
- Jeschke Convicted of Sex Crimes
- Jeschke Trial Closes
- High School Tennis Coach Arrested for Having Sex With Teen
- More here
This story has been amended for accuracy since its initial publication: Two charges of supplying drugs to the girl he had sex with, which resulted in a mistrial, were in fact not filed again with the new set of charges.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Incredible how guys like this get a break. They might not commit murder of the body but they commit murder of the spirit and soul of their victims. The victims have to serve a life sentence in their mind. How about intimidation of a witness?
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
November 19, 2009 at 8:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
AZ2SB read the article, they are charging him with witness intimidation;
"Jeschke is not yet out of the woods, though, as he still faces nine additional charges, including witness intimidation counts... "
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
November 19, 2009 at 9:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Oops, missed that. So does this mean he can go to prison? I have a feeling that they will probably run the charges concurrent and he will still get out on just probation. If so those additional charges are just on paper, because they carry no consequence.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
November 19, 2009 at 3:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
They cannot run charges concurrent when they have two separate trials, only when there is one trial and multiple counts are alleged. They can still give him probation on the new charges if he is found guilty or pleads to them, but that would be unlikely.
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
November 20, 2009 at 4:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Then he might not be getting that pass after all?
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
November 20, 2009 at 7:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This scumbag needs to go to prison. For a long time. Period. When are we going to say enough to this unacceptable behavior? Consensual or not, he broke the law and is a sexual predator. Try him, judge him, and sentence him as such.
This is, thus far, reprehensible that our court system cannot or will not invoke mandatory terms for this criminal behavior. Repulsive---on all sides.
Draxor (anonymous profile)
November 20, 2009 at 8:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You are forgetting their foolproof psychology test they gave him that says he is at extremely low-risk of committing a crime like this again. Doesn't that make you feel all better about it now?
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
November 20, 2009 at 10:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I support Judge Ochoa's position to grant probation. I know the emotion many feel regarding this case. Judge Ohoa listened to the victim and to the Jury and the community of supporters for the Defendent. He heard the evidence and read the pysch evaluations. He listened and followed the law. It is apparent to me that Judge Ochoa is an open-minded, honorable judge who upholds the law.
shonnie (anonymous profile)
November 20, 2009 at 11:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Judge Ochoa is a buffoon on many levels, don't fool yourself. He is very liberal, a bleeding heart, and a danger to the community.
But as I have said before and I say again, judges are the most un-controlled portion of our legal system. There are very few ways to disagree with a judge and win. They believe they are god-like in their courtroom and most have huge egos. Our legal system needs reform; specifically the way judges can be disciplined, reviewed, and supervised.
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
November 20, 2009 at 12:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Judge Ochoa has done a wonderful job in Drug court, and he is a good judge. This decision though seems like it was made more in consideration of the offender than in the interest of public safety.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
November 20, 2009 at 12:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Judge Ochoa handled the following case:
http://www.independent.com/news/2008/...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 22, 2009 at 4:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Judge Ochoa should have gotten the Johnigan case and this one should have gone to Judge Rigali.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
November 22, 2009 at 4:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)