Santa Barbara Police Chief Cam Sanchez is named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed on October 29 by Mission Terrace convalescent home, which alleges Sanchez and his wife’s family didn’t pay the home for housing his wife’s mother for almost two years. The lawsuit, which alleges there is an unpaid balance of $133,964.77, plus interest, also names Arminda Gonzales, Daniel Gonzales Jr., Daniel Gonzales Sr., and Sanchez’s wife, Guadalupe Olivia Gonzales Sanchez.
The complaint states that the family admitted the police chief’s mother-in-law, Arminda Gonzales, to the home on December 27, 2007, and signed a contract promising to pay. She was under the home’s care until September 24, 2009, when the family took her out of the home. While there were multiple requests for payment, no payment was ever made, according to the suit, which was filed on behalf of Mission Terrace by Lawrence Conlan of the Cappello and Noël law firm. Conlan didn’t return a call requesting comment. Steve McGuire, an L.A.-based attorney representing Sanchez and his wife, gave this statement: “Chief Sanchez and his wife deny all the allegations that have been made against them, and we intend to prove that they have no liability for all or any part of the amount demanded in the complaint.”
The suit alleges breach of contract, breach of oral contract, and unjust enrichment among other things. Sanchez has been named in lawsuits in the past, including two related to unpaid medical bills. They have since been resolved.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
Maybe Cam is on to something. It would really help our budget if we just promised we'd pay on the Police pension commitments and then walked away when it came time to pay up.
el_smurfo (anonymous profile)
December 16, 2010 at 6:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
How many people would ever get married if they knew they would be held responsible for health care of their in-laws?????
taz (anonymous profile)
December 16, 2010 at 7:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
LA attorney for our local police chief?
surfimp (anonymous profile)
December 16, 2010 at 8:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
makes sense to have an out of town attorney...what ... you want the chief of police beholden to someone in his district?
snapolis (anonymous profile)
December 16, 2010 at 10:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So much for the "This is my town" propaganda as "On Patrol" airs.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
December 16, 2010 at 12:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Two years without payment? That got my attention. There's more to be discovered here I do believe.....
MediaPro (anonymous profile)
December 16, 2010 at 8:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We really don't know a damn thing about this, do we? So let's mind our own business. If something comes of this, we'll hear about it.
ChrisG (anonymous profile)
December 17, 2010 at 12:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So is this another case of "do as I say, not as I do" so prevalent in our national political circuses? Or did the forever stamp fall off the envelope containing the payment in full.
Stay tuned hypocritikiddies!
Draxor (anonymous profile)
December 17, 2010 at 9:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We do not convict but we do not ever "mind our own business" when it comes to high profile public figures. It is all about accountability.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
December 18, 2010 at 10:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Right on ChrisG. Mission Terrace has been named as the defendant in numerous law suits over the past 10 years (check the public record at the courthouse) and the owner is not the most honest person you'll ever meet. She's...clever. Judgment should definitely be reserved until the details of this case are hashed out.
Kingprawn (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2010 at 7:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Judgment should be reserved indeed.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2010 at 9:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)