It was such a love fest for Sheriff Bill Brown at the county supervisors’ meeting this Tuesday that board chair Janet Wolfe gushed she was both “100 percent” and “110 percent” behind his plan to put a half-cent sales tax increase before county voters this coming November for the construction of new jail in North County. “I’m very satisfied,” added Supervisor Doreen Farr. And Supervisor Joni Gray exclaimed, “I’m willing —actually excited about supporting this.”
Even with the supervisors’ unanimous wind at his back, Brown and his sales tax have anything but smooth sailing ahead. A sales tax increase requires a super-majority of two-thirds to pass, almost a political impossibility in the face of any organized opposition, no matter how marginal. Two weeks ago, when Brown first brought the proposed initiative—which he estimates would generate $30 million a year—to the supervisors for support, they expressed chagrin that he waited so long to broach the subject with them. They insisted that he “tweak” key details and bring his proposal back. Brown clearly took their suggestions to heart and, for at least this week, his efforts paid off.
The basic package remains much the same. Of the $30 million a year the initiative would raise, half will go to building—and then running—the new 304-bed facility on county-owned land in North County. (In addition, the State of California set aside $56.3 million in jail construction bonds for the new jail several years.) The remainder would be split three ways between local law enforcement agencies, local firefighting agencies, and a host of prevention and intervention programs designed to reduce the county’s recidivism rate of 70 percent.
Brown has insisted that the prevention component is essential to mitigating overcrowding at the county’s main jail where up to 1,800 prisoners a year are released early because of lack of space. “These are not touchy-feely types of programs,” Brown stated, arguing they were substantiated by “solid empirical evidence,” not just good intentions. They also make for good politics. Mental health advocate Susan Riordan noted that the number of people behind bars has quadrupled between 1980 and 2004. Many of those, she said, were mentally ill, self-medicating, or chemically dependent, but not violent or dangerous. Riordan suggested that Brown might need to get “touchy-feely,” adding, “The only reason we’re supporting this is that there’s a component involving treatment and prevention.”
At Supervisor Salud Carbajal’s insistence, Brown agreed to share more of the funds raised with the County Fire Department. At Supervisor Wolf’s urging, he agreed to give a share of the proceeds to County Probation. At the suggestion of Supervisor Joe Centeno, Brown changed the very name of the initiative to give prominent play to the term “gang suppression.” He also extended the life span of the bond from 10 to 14 years and created a citizens oversight committee to ensure the funds were spent as intended.
And Brown brought along a few high-powered friends, like Santa Barbara and Lompoc police chiefs Cam Sanchez and Tim Dabney, respectively, like County Fire chief Mike Dyer, and like Santa Maria Mayor Larry Lavagnino, whose son, Steve, was just elected to replace Centeno at the expiration of Centeno’s term this winter. He also brought along two former North County supervisors—DeWayne Holmdahl and Tom Urbanske—to sing the proposal’s praises. Holmdahl noted that the need for a North County jail was screamingly obvious 25 years ago, adding that Brown’s plan was far better than the jail bond proposal that went down to overwhelming defeat in 2000. “It’s the best one I’ve ever seen,” he said. More than that, Brown enlisted the support of Carpinteria Councilmember Joe Armendariz—who also heads the County Taxpayers Association. “Nobody hates higher taxes more than I do,” declared Armendariz. But of the ballot measure, Armendariz said, “It’s pretty close to a perfect proposal.”
The most discouraging words came from Andy Caldwell, spokesperson for the conservative COLAB, who expressed concern that the new 304-bed facility could be overwhelmed if the California Department of Corrections forces county governments throughout the state to assume incarceration responsibilities for up to 40,000 state inmates serving time on relatively minor offenses—as is now being discussed. But for all his pessimism, Caldwell said he hadn’t taken a position on the initiative yet and wasn’t sure that he would.
Caldwell and Armendariz—political bosom buddies—could prove key to the success or failure of Brown’s bond measure. Their support was definitely critical two years ago to the passage of Measure A—the half-cent sales tax increase used to pay for a wide range of freeway widening, road improvement, and mass transit projects. Likewise, North County voters are much more tax adverse than their South Coast compatriots, so Brown’s show of support from North County politicos was strategic. To help make his case, Brown will be able to argue—but only because of a fluke of timing—that even with the half-cent sales tax increase, the total sales tax charged in Santa Barbara County will drop by one-quarter of a percent. He will also argue that by building a new jail, the county can “save lives, reduce crime, and restore integrity to the criminal justice system.”
Even so, his challenge remains immense. A survey conducted early last year showed that only 45 percent of likely voters supported the tax. That number jumped to 59 percent after hearing arguments on its behalf. But that’s still considerably shy of the two-thirds needed for passage.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
rstein9 (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2010 at 6:48 a.m.
Another stellar example of why I hate politics. It offends me that our sheriff and our supervisors think that SBCO residents are so dim witted they will buy this "...perfect proposal." Centeno suggests a more prominent position for the term gang suppression. By all means, let's play the fear card in order to get more money. And shame on you Bill Brown, dubbing this as "a fluke of timing" instead of calling it what it is: a well thought out, targeted political step conceived to coincide with the expiration of the temporary tax in a deliberate manner, not by an unintended fluke. But the most offensive part of the plan is spinning the idead that our sales tax will actually drop with proposed increased! Well, it's about to drop even more, the full 1% it went up TEMPORARILY when our economy tanked. And just an aside: If building a new jail is so critically important for our community, then shouldn't our elected officials find the funds to build it? Isn't that a better plan than sending our top cop to the streets to play a slimy, spin-filled game of politics?
InterestedParty (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2010 at 8:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You guys are sure heavy handed in censoring my comments. Not cuss words, no violence.....
Heavy political censorship....and I thought you guys were Independent????
rstein9 (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2010 at 8:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Instead of providing more employment for the CA Prison Guards, or whatever euphemism they apply to themselves, who are a major part of CA's runaway govemployee union costs, why not export the prisoners to a lower cost state and pay that state to house them?
John_Locke (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2010 at 9:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why is it that the average citizens must pay or sacrifice for the public sector employees? The same employees that make an average 13% more, get better benefits, and retirement plans.
Remember when there was a proposal for country employees to pay for parking, like we do? Salud Carbajal said NO!!!!! Our employees do enough for us....by retiring at 55, at 95% of highest salary and free healthcare for life.
SEIU and other public service unions are smiling at our board of supervisors. Everyone else is glaring.
jukin (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2010 at 2:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How about not putting people in jail for stupid reasons? That would could down the jail population and then you wouldn't need a whole new jail. Let me give you a hint where to start-marijuana offenses.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2010 at 11:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Jail Population is at 120% while Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, and Lompoc Bail Bondsmen report a 90% -YES, NINETY PER CENT! -decline in business since Sheriff Brown took office…If you wanted to set out to overcrowd the Jails, one of the most immediate and effective ways to do it would be to deny release on bail bond to all inmates who are eligible for it…
There is compelling evidence (accounts by criminal defense attorneys and inmates; official records) that inmates are routinely subjected to ADMINISTRATIVE DELAYS of their release from custody, or are illegally denied the right to bail out, which directly exacerbates the very OVERCROWDING at the Jails which the Sheriff has cited as the justification for a TAX to build a new Jail to -you guessed it- alleviate the OVERCROWDING. Although the allegations have been brought to the attention of the media and the powers that be, no one to date has taken the Sheriff to task on the issue.
. Recall the lawsuit filed earlier this year by local Bail Bondsmen against the Sheriff . The Lawsuit, to be fair, was dismissed on procedural grounds, but the allegations made in it were not thoroughly aired in court.
It was alleged that, beginning shortly after Sheriff Brown took office, call volume to the Bondsmen began to drop off.
VERY SIMPLY PUT, JAIL STAFF ARE ALLEGED TO BE USING AN ENDLESS REPERTOIRE OF TACTICS TO DENY INMATES RELEASE ON (BAIL) BOND.
The tactics allegedly being employed include:
-Ordering inmates who are ELIGIBLE FOR BAIL and in the middle of a phone call attempting to arrange for release on Bond, to hang up the phone so that they may be assigned a uniform and be housed until their first court date, rather than be released immediately, as is their right if eligible for bail;
-Holding inmates in cells with no telephones, or with telephones that do not work, making it impossible to call a bondsman or anyone else, for that matter, for up to 24 hours at a time and allowing persistent and recurring technical problems to chronically deny inmates their right to complete the free calls to the outside which are guaranteed by law;
-Ignoring Bail Bonds that have already been posted at the Jail’s front desk, and either sending the inmates in question on the bus to court. In one such instance a legal resident had her bond ignored, was taken to court, and then had an Immigration Hold, which does not apply to legal residents, placed on her, needlessly extending her time in custody.
-Allegedly lying to inmates by telling them that their Bail Bond has not yet been posted by their Bond Agent. In such cases inmates then call to complain to the Bail Agent, who produces documentation that the Bond indeed was posted, in some cases hours earlier.
It could very well be that allowing all inmates unimpeded access to bail would bring the Jail population down from 120% to, say, 100%, which would mean the end of overcrowding, and with that the evaporation of the justification for the new Jail…
swunderkind (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2010 at 11:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Isn't it a crime to deface U.S. currency? :)
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
July 8, 2010 at 12:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
NO MORE TAXES!!1
jukin (anonymous profile)
July 8, 2010 at 9:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey, Sheriff! Since ya can't protect us, how 'bout issuing concealed carry permits to us adult non-felons. As the history in Florida shows, gun crimes drop DRAMATICALLY when concealed carry is allowed.
John_Locke (anonymous profile)
July 8, 2010 at 1:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"NO MORE TAXES!!1"
-- jukin
Nobody likes taxes but that's the most ignorant comment I've seen here lately. What a spoiled adult crybaby.
You might as well say:
- No more law enforcement.
- No more public roads.
- No more social security.
- No more public education.
- No more libraries.
- No more army, navy, air force, marines.
- No more public parks.
- No more food safety
- and myriad other things you take for granted.
We're living in an historically low tax-rate period in the US and all you can do is whine!
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
July 8, 2010 at 9:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
EastBeach, that's exactly what I was thinking!
I have notified the Secret Service.
Pinatubo (anonymous profile)
July 8, 2010 at 10:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Another jail is not needed. Not here. Not anywhere else in California.
Sorry, Sheriff, but most of us are unwilling to take your word about how best to allocate our tax dollars at a time when so much money is spent on keeping people behind bars and far too little is spent on providing adequate educational opportunities for our young people.
I think that the campaign that the Sheriff says he is looking forward to will provide an excellent opportunity to explore this wasteful imbalance.
It will be interesting to see who pours money into the Sheriff's effort to try to persuade 67% of us to vote against our own best interests.
I am not a betting man, but I think that the tax measure will fail to gain a simple majority. Perhaps not even 40%.
marcmcginnes (anonymous profile)
July 9, 2010 at 9:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
More people. More crime. More space.
Bird (anonymous profile)
July 9, 2010 at 1:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
East Beach, you're being too literal minded. Let's assume that jukin is a rational person and meant no more NEW taxes or tax increases. Many, MANY people agree with that view. If jukin is so mentally challenged as to think society could survive with literally no taxes, the effort of a reply is not worth the energy.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
July 10, 2010 at 12:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If I couldn't make out the coin in his hand I would think he was saying "Go on, take this pill".
sixdolphins (anonymous profile)
July 11, 2010 at 3:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
There is no way this will pass. People are fed up with more taxes. Gov't needs to learn that the era of a pension is over. Healthcare is too expenisve and ultimately will bankrupt all gov't institutions. At that time, the slate will be wiped clean and pensions will disappear. Do not try to stop the inevitable. NO MORE TAXES. SPEND WISELY.
Upper_State (anonymous profile)
July 11, 2010 at 10:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
When we have China pointing at us and accusing the US of Human Rights Violations because we lock up the highest percentage of our population then ANY other nation on this planet - we have a problem.
The solution IS NOT to build more jails!
The solution IS NOT to tax us more!
Yet another case of politicians playing politics to protect their jobs, rather the facing the harder issues of why we are locking up so many people in the first place.
This plan = epic fail
bronc (anonymous profile)
July 12, 2010 at 10:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sheriff Carona was convicted and sentenced to 5 years in jail. However, he is out on bail while appeals are processed. Because he retired prior to being let go, the disgraced sheriff's pension is still in good standing.
In 2009 he received $215,000 from his pension. According to sources at the Orange County Employees Retirement System, approximately 400 retired public servants received more than $100,000 last year in benefits alone.
"It was right after Sept. 11," stated Orange County Supervisor John Moorlach. "All of a sudden, public safety people became elevated to god status. The Board of Supervisors were tripping over themselves to make the motion."
sa1 (anonymous profile)
July 12, 2010 at 4:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Move the retirement age to 65 from the current 50 for sheriff's employees and voila - we can build 2 new jails and not lay off any more cops. No more taxes! We could probably pay for the new jail just on Sheriff Bill's retirement plan.
reality_check (anonymous profile)
July 13, 2010 at 5:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let's just stop putting away non-violent drug offendors so that we no longer have the huge increase in prisoners that has occurred in the last 30 years. DA's - community service is a great way to straighten non-violent people out and get them involved in society. Putting them in a cell doesn't make them better in society. It just creates harder criminals. Bill Browneye is a political machine, running un-opposed and somehow trying to raise taxes from a sherrif's position. This is complete BS. Vote NO emphatically on this terrible proposal. Then, after you vote NO ask your representatives why there are no measures to increase funding to educate our children. If a $.005 sales tax increase can raise $30 million a year in 1 county how can we keep finding ways to cut from our education system but still propose putting more people in jail. Next, ask our CA reps why we were able to cut $9billion from education (that is K-College) but only $1billion from the jail system. After reading the above, you may see what a self-defecating system this is where our leaders are more concerned about putting people behind bars and fighting symptomatic problems instead of seeing how things like this proposal are just continuing a cycle to the detriment of society. You will continue to see people like Bill Browneye adding to their resume of "great" things they are trying to do in the name of society as they move their way up the political ladder at the public's expense. Please, don't be fooled!
billbrowneye (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2010 at 3:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Agree 100% that I'm taxed too much already. Tax me any more and California will be in my rear view mirror and you'll have another empty house to watch.
Let me have my CCW Sheriff Brown!
bigiron (anonymous profile)
October 15, 2010 at 1:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)