Dr. Dan Secord, who lost to Janet Wolf in the 2006 race for the Santa Barbara Board of Supervisor’s 2nd District seat, pulled paperwork on Monday to challenge Wolf in this year’s primary, set for June 8.
The move, however, doesn’t mean anything unless he turns those papers back into the county election’s office by the end of the day on Friday. Secord said he is waiting for the results of a poll being conducted by political consultant John Davies before making a decision. “I need some data,” he said. He told The Independent Monday afternoon that he had been making inquiries for several months into potentially running.
Given the current state of the county’s budget (it is currently facing a deficit of $30-something million), there’s little doubt fiscal focus will be Secord’s rallying cry this time around, as it was the last race. “This election is going to be about the county’s budget, and who has done something with the budget and who hasn’t,” Secord said. “[The supervisors] continue to spend money and build things and give raises. They’ve got to live in the same reality we do.” Secord, echoing much of what he often said in the race four years ago, declared he wants the county to establish a finance committee filled with members knowledgeable on the budget, and that he is better equipped to deal with fiscal issues. “I’m not sure it’s about Janet,” he explained, going after Wolf’s experience, just as he did four years ago. “She was elected with no experience and limited knowledge. She’s probably done what you’d expect. She didn’t cause these problems; she’s just chosen not to grapple with them.”
Wolf responded Monday night, explaining she not only dealt with the budget as a school board member for 12 years in the Goleta Valley School District, but also for the past three years as a supervisor. “If anything, I’ve got more experience than I did three years ago,” she said. “It’s really kind of a silly comment actually.”
Given Wolf’s strong presence on the board and non-controversial time in the position, it seems Secord would have little ammunition to go after Wolf with outside of budgetary issues and a difference in ideology. Though many (including Secord) questioned the experience of Wolf (who now sits as the chair of the board), she has shown herself to be an intelligent addition to the board, and a soft but firm voice who is not afraid to ask tough, probing questions of staff. She has been a staunch opponent of development along the Gaviota Coast and was also was the leading crusader in taking more power away from the CEO’s office and putting it in the hands of the supervisors, a move Secord opposed. “I’m very proud of my record,” she said. “I’m more than happy to have the campaign and discuss my record.”
Paul Wellman (file)
Dan Secord and Janet Wolf at a forum for the Santa Barbara County 2nd District Supervisors race held at the Goleta Valley Community Center. 10/5/06
No doubt in the back of the mind of Secord, a moderate Republican, is the potential opportunity to take advantage of recent national trends that have shown Democratic seats to be vulnerable. Secord, who for awhile was mentioned as a possible candidate for mayor of Santa Barbara, is an alternate on the California Coastal Commission, having served as a commissioner in 2005. He also spent two terms on the Santa Barbara City Council before making his move for the supervisor’s seat.
Secord defeated Wolf (by 51 votes) and two others in the 2006 primary, but didn’t receive 50 percent of the vote, leading to a runoff in November. In that, he lost by 1,619 out of more than 32,000 votes cast in the 2nd District, half of which is in the suburban Goleta Valley, the other in the city of Santa Barbara.
A quiet winter leading up to this week left many to wonder if Wolf would ease her way into reelection. She has held a few fundraisers along the way, ballooning her stockpile of cash by $117,372 in 2009, a show of strength to anyone considering a run. She currently has nearly $70,000 in cash on-hand. While Wolf would have a good head start, Secord has shown an ability to fundraise, even out-raising Wolf in the 2006 campaign $457,000 to $447,700.
Many insiders were surprised to see that no one had jumped into the ring earlier against Wolf, considering two key, strategic reasons: to make the Democratic machine expend a little energy, and because this is the last election prior to the all-important redistricting of the district lines in 2011. Should Wolf go unchallenged, Democrats could focus their attention — and money — on other races in the region, including the 35th Assembly race where either Das Williams or Susan Jordan will be squaring off against Mike Stoker in November, the 33rd Assembly race where Hildy Zacharias is facing an uphill battle to have any chance of winning, or even the County’s 5th District seat, which is opening up with Joe Centeno’s upcoming retirement. As one political insider put it, “No party wants to see the other walk scot free.”
After the 2010 census, the supervisors will be tasked with redrawing the county district lines, a usually mundane, drawn-out task, but one that has great importance in the scheme of things, and could tip the balance to whatever the board majority may be. Should Wolf retain her seat, she — along with 3rd District Supervisor Doreen Farr and 1st District Supervisor Salud Carbajal — will sit in the majority. Secord’s more conservative stance would likely align closer to 4th District Supervisor Joni Gray and potentially a conservative winner in the 5th District. The power balance rings especially important in the 3rd District, where there sits the greatest chance of the lines changing — or not changing — dramatically.
So, as Secord waits for numbers to come back, Wolf waits for the clock to strike 5 o’clock Friday to see who she might be facing, if anyone.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
I'll vote for him because he's a doctor. -Dr. sevensnugbills-
Drsevensnugbills (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 3:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Me too.
sevensnugkrats (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 3:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm glad Dr. Josef Mengele isn't running. He was a doctor, too. Just because someone is a doctor, doesn't make them the best candidate.
What ever happened to critical thinking skills in this country? All one has to do is look at the popularity of Sarah Palin, and all the people in this country who believe she is qualified to be president. It's a direct correlation with our educational system, that appears to have failed in teaching critical thinking skills, especially in political science.
arepe (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 8:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It will be a waste of time and money for Secord to run again. If he couldn't beat Janet when, as he says, she had little name recognition and experience, how does he expect to beat her now?
Secord is betting on a "throw the bums out" strategy. But his long service on SB's City Council contributed to the mess the council is in now, so it's not like he would come in with clean hands.
Secord should not waste the time and money of his supporters and what will be a losing cause. Been there, done that. He should just enjoy his retirement.
Richard_Saunders (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Clearly Dr. Dan has been spending his time licking his wounds from his loss four years ago rather than actually watching the Board meetings. Cause if he was watching he'd learn that throughout her term Janet Wolf has relentlessly questioned the expenditures of every department and especially gone after the raises and "bonuses" allotted to executives. He can catch up on the archives if he wants.
realitychecksb (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 8:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
User profile: realitychecksb
Joined: March 9, 2010
Comments posted: 1 (view all)
Pinatubo (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 11:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Get real. Wolf is a tax and spender and Secord, contrary to the rather uninformed comments above, was the voice of reason against huge employee pensions and other spending we couldn't afford. When it comes to the biggest budget line item of all, government unionized employees, Wolf is a pushover and not a friend of the taxpayer. The $155 million pension obligation our Supervisors have created is a debt of about $300,000 for every man, woman , and child in SB County. Got your checkbook ready? Or do you just plan to leave, like the Supes leave office, before payment is due?
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 4:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well, not to put too fine a point on it, but I'm pretty sure that most of SB County's indebtedness is due to labor contracts signed well before Wolf took office.
However, if Bush hadn't wrecked the national economy with tax cuts for the rich and a $ trillon dollar Iraq war we didn't need, if Schwarzenegger hadn't wrecked CA's economy by cutting the car registration fee that would have raised $5 billion annually, SB County would have plenty of $$ to pay a decent wage and provide decent services.
Secord understands medicine...and needs to keep practicing. I'm told he's a good doctor.
Richard_Saunders (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 6:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
hmmm well, perhaps the "recent national trends" to be a teabagger might mean more if Secord moved to the fifth district where the right-wing momentum might mean play. Does he really want to hitch his erstwhile wagon, already missing one wheel from his loss in 2006, to a movement that gets its wind from a sea of misinformation and rhetoric a la Glen Beck and Sean Hannity?
sbsleuth99 (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 6:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
OH please again. Teabagger is not an insult, in spite of those pornwatchers who think it is. Teabaggers would simply like our government to stop throwing taxpayer money away - something our local and state governments have raised to a fine art - throwing it into the pockets of unionized government employees, that is. California is now an international poster boy, along with Greece, for financial incompetence and malfeasance of public officials. Those of you wasting your time and energy blaming Bush are simply failing to face the real problem. Forget Bush and, for that matter, Obama. We, in California, have an entrenched government (not Arnold, folks, but your elected reps and senators) that is bankrupting the state and saddling the citizens with nearly unimaginable debt - all to keep peace with the government employee unions and loud special interest groups. We need private business tax revenue, not to mention an entire new slate of government officials, responsible ones this time. Or are we still, as has been mentioned in the worldwide press, still in la la land???
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 7:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Its surprising to see some of the language being tossed around, Secord a Teabagger he was a moderate and on the Santa Barbara council when he was the only Republican on it. He was obviously moderate enough for Santa Barbara at the time (pre Dale days and SB is more liberal than the 3rd district).
I do not know if I would vote for him, however would love someone to run with the budget as a issue. Salud, Janet and the others have not addressed the problem and it would force them to finally address the issue if they faced a halfway decent candidate. To me its a win win, bring the issue up and force the South County Supes to finally have to address it in more than passing manner.
pointssouth (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 8:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am no Janet Wolf fan, but Dan Secord is a narrow-minded, elitist individual who detests the poor and homeless, the working class, and can't even get along with his neighbors.
When are we going to be delivered from these "night of the living dead" politicians who just won't GO AWAY?
Go away Carbajal, Wolf and Secord, ad nauseum. Please give us all a break.
Term limits...a beautiful thing!
Holly (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2010 at 12:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yeah, Holly, term limits at the State level have solved all of our problems. We no longer have a budget morass and gridlock.
What color is the sky in your world?
SezMe (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2010 at 1:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Would the county be facing the deficits, $ 30 million and rising, if Dan had gotten elected? What ever you say about his politics he constantly was the voice of reason on the City Council. He rejected the huge raises for the Police Dept as too costly. Of Course Law Enforcement endorsed Janet Wolf. She's a tool of the very powerful Political Machine that hold power. If Dan wants to run, then that's his right.
CManSB (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2010 at 1:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What a coincidence - just last evening I received a phone call from a man who said he was conducting a poll on Janet Wolf vs Dan Secord. I was intrigued, and curious to see what the questions were like. Turned out that they were all loaded, and contained blatant lies. Some of the questions: "Would you be more or less likely to vote for Janet Wolf if you knew that she was totally against fiscal responsibility?" and "Do you know that Dan Secord is fully committed to fiscal responsibility?" and "Did you know that Janet Wolf has not followed through with ANY of the promises she made to get elected?"
I noted the man calling had a New York accent, so I asked where he was calling from - he said, "Manhattan." So obviously Secord has hired a NY public relations firm to spread vicious lies in order to convince people to vote for Secord. What else is new with the Republicans?
BETTYPIANO (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2010 at 4:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
or maybe Wolf's people have hired a local supporter with a New York accent to make you think that "Secord has hired..." Talk about jumping to conclusions. Think it doesn't happen? Take a look at the campaign Gray Davis' people led to discredit Richard Riordan.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2010 at 7:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
or maybe BETTYPIANO has herself been hired to spread lies about Secord.
Pinatubo (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2010 at 8 p.m. (Suggest removal)
yep, maybe so. ya jest never know do ya.
PS Like the Dems never spread vicious lies about Bush. Yah, right, the Dems are always the high moral ground. Just ask Charlie Rangel, Jane Harman, Jack Murtha, Dianne Feinstein, Ron Saunders...and that's only those ethically-challenged Dems in the news since Feb 1!
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2010 at 8:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Now THIS is how to expose a supervisorial election Push Poll:
http://www.voteforparks.com/stricklan...
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
March 10, 2010 at 9:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
and your point is?
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2010 at 10:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I just want to remind everyone that Dan Secord was one of the worst Coastal Commissioners in terms of voting to protect the coast. He almost invariably voted IN FAVOR of development projects when he was on the Coastal Commission. If he gets onto the BOS we can expect nothing but bad news for the Gaviota Coast. As far as his being a fiscal conservative I'd say that Janet's record is pretty fiscally conservative too. Probably not quite as much as Secord was and would be but there are other important issues besides the budget. The budget is a huge problem, no doubt, but tax less spend less is not going to give us a better county, better roads, healthier greener environment. As a pretty affluent guy Secord can afford to take nice vacations and do things that the rest of cannot so we need more in terms of public services, parks and recreation. Personally I hope he runs because I think he will likely lose and waste a lot of money and energy and perhaps discourage another more viable candidate from running but my opinion counts for very little, I'm sure, in Secord's decision making process. I believe Janet Wolf has been an excellent Supervisor and after a slow start has really learned the job well. We need her for another term.
Noletaman (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2010 at 10:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)