Making It Better
Parking, Partying, and Trash
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Bigger is always better, or so we’ve been led to believe. Universities are not exempt from this maxim. By 2025, UCSB is scheduled to increase its student population by 5,000, to have built 5,443 additional single living spaces, and to have created or replaced 8,750 parking spaces.
This is all in UCSB’s Long Range Development Plan (LRDP), which is going through the planning process at this time. If you’re wondering how this is going to affect surrounding areas, including Isla Vista, I can tell you, it’s going to make the problems the residents face worse. That is, unless the university alters its approach.
Cat Neushul
UCSB representatives mostly seem to take a hands-off approach to what students do off campus. Once students walks into I.V., what they do is their or someone else’s responsibility. I understand the rationale, but this does not create good relations with the university’s neighbors.
Right now, student-generated problems in I.V. include parking, trash, excessive noise, and random stupid acts that can be surprisingly creative. You never know what you’ll see when you stroll the streets of I.V.
Parking has always been an issue here. When 12 students are packed into a house and each one owns a car, this means that the street is filled with their cars. Now imagine that every house in I.V. is filled to capacity. If you find a parking space in the area, consider yourself lucky.
There are provisions in UCSB’s LRDP to provide enough parking, as well as housing, etc., to accommodate all the new students, faculty, and staff. But even if it does, there’s no guarantee these opportunities will be taken. Take for example the parking problem. While it’s difficult to find a parking space in I.V., you can drive a short distance and see rows of empty parking spaces in some of UCSB’s lots. You may ask why that is. It’s simple, students, just like everyone else, know that free is better.
Also, while the university might pride itself on going green, not all students have embraced the concept. Many left their cars behind when they left home to come to the university, but there are still quite a few who need their cars to sit out front of their homes in anticipation of the weekly Albertson’s run.
Maybe the university could offer a tantalizing incentive for all the students who do not bring cars here. (A fee break, coupons to Blenders, what have you.) This, coupled with a focus on the use of the shared vehicles (e.g. Zipcar) would make having your own car a little less attractive.
Then there’s the trash. While the university is going to build housing on campus for the additional students, this does not mean these students won’t be socializing in I.V. I suggest that the university start a trash education program to teach students about such basic environmental practices as recycling and cleaning up after yourself. Maybe the university could even fund trash patrols. I’d love to see students get tickets for leaving red cups all over the sidewalk and street after a party. After Halloween, some of the larger cactus plants were decorated with empty cardboard boxes. That should be a fat ticket.
Another problem I.V. residents have to deal with is the party element. More students mean more parties, more noise, and more drunken and disorderly behavior. While hiring more police officers will be essential to keeping the peace, the university can also play a role. Last year, UCSB did team with the local community and law enforcement to make sure that a repeat of the Floatopia debacle didn’t occur. In the future, this type of collaboration will be essential to make sure that the university has a positive relationship with I.V. and other nearby communities.
The university has a mandate to grow, and there doesn’t seem to be a way to stop that progress. There is a way to make sure this growth has the least negative effects on the community surrounding it. If community members can voice their concerns and suggestions about parking, trash, and party-related issues, and if they are listened to, there is a good chance that things won’t get worse.
In fact, with a little more attention to the details that will make living in I.V. easier for residents, the university could take the LRDP as an opportunity to make things better for its neighbors.
Related Links
Comments
I think a better way to address the parking in IV would be for the County to start putting a price on parking there ... instead of UCSB cutting the price of parking on campus to 0. Some kind of permitting program for certain zones in IV would do much. In any case, costs associated with the car (providing parking and traffic congestion) will not be solved by making it free. Time for the County to help UCSB, by getting real about the costs of the auto in IV and pricing those costs, like UCSB already has on campus.
Frankly, you don't need a car just to get to Albertson's. When I lived in IV as a student, I got to Albertson's (then it was Smiths and later Luckys) by using the bus and buying only what I could carry. Or I rode my bike to IV Market and bought what I could carry in backpack. At least back then, more of us students just didn't have the money to afford a car. And we got by just fine.
So since affordability of cars seems to have gone up among current students, perhaps rather than UCSB paying students to leave them home as you suggest, maybe UCSB could ADD a fee to those who wish to bring them, and who don't live on campus (where they will pay, via parking fees). Not an outright ban on students having cars like so many Universities ... just pay the hefty fee if you want to bring it and apparently can afford it, and UCSB would hand it over to County to address off campus impacts in IV. I marvel at the number of students driving nice BMW's and Mercedes in IV these days ... so I don't think such a car impact fee would present much burden.
There is no need for UCSB to start a trash education program, or a program to educate students on the need for moderation in drinking, or education about the harm caused by floatopia. UCSB's selective admissions mean that the student's are among the brightest around. If these lessons haven't been learned before admission to UCSB, something's very wrong at home. If the students admitted still don't "get it", then it means an error was made in Admissions, and it would serve everyone well to give these students the boot. Where UCSB has failed both County and itself is in enforcing adult levels of accountability among students for bad behavior in IV. Need a few more expulsions, less nanny slaps on wrist or "second chances". Treating adults like adults, a novel concept but could work wonders, give it a try.
OldDawg (anonymous profile)
September 11, 2010 at 9:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
UCSB, sadly, has become like a cancer in our community. Unlimited, unrestrained and seemingly unstoppable growth. Sure, there are some nice things that it provides to the community, but at this point with this new LRDP the negatives will vastly outweigh the positives. Our only hope is legal action and appeals to the Coastal Commission.
Noletaman (anonymous profile)
September 11, 2010 at 12:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P_HKQ...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 12, 2010 at 4:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"I can tell you, it’s going to make the problems the residents face worse. "
Yeah! An honest journalist.
Maybe students could stop using there toilets so we don't overrun the sewage treatment plant and end up surfing in our own recycled fast food.
The mandates are bad State policy serving special interests, not the students or residents.
Georgy (anonymous profile)
September 12, 2010 at 8:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Ms. Neushul remarks that "The university has a mandate to grow, and there doesn’t seem to be a way to stop that progress." Perhaps so. But "to grow" can be taken many ways. Expansion to cover every square meter of land on the spit with "sustainable" edifices and upping the enrollment to equal the population of Singapore is certainly one way. But as she points out, I.V. is already at a tipping point, and failure to take that into account while expanding the school population is only to bigger, not better.
While there is no way to stop progress, at least at the macro level, it can involve qualitative growth rather than quantitative bloat. Improving programs, reaching beyond excellence, and innovative use of existing spaces and better use of resources are also progress.
Big universities tend to behave like 800 pound gorillas. They're programmed to reproduce and grow bigger. They see their role as the greatest of good and sometimes use the tactics of corporate predators to get their way with all the usual rationalizations and justifications of developers - "they'll thank us some day."
For better and worse, UCSB is an integral part of the Goleta/Santa Barbara/I.V. community. It is on a point, not an island unto itself. So this little pocket of the Central Coast is an interactive living system. As the writer points out, the university's planning needs to incorporate the off-campus fallout into that system better.
If you build it, they will come. Maybe that's good news for the bartenders, but it's not so exciting for many ordinary folk who are more town than gown. To grow the quality of UCSB from outstanding to superb is great; but don't just pack in 10k more students because a gorilla with county land can.
anemonefish (anonymous profile)
September 12, 2010 at 2:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Somebody here please correct me if I'm mistaken but here 'goes: hasn't the ideology of these incoming students and the university been anti-development? If so, that would be the ultimate irony.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 12, 2010 at 3:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)