Attorneys for Santa Barbara RV dwellers want a Superior Court Judge to throw out a settlement they made with the city in 2007, because, they say, the city isn’t honoring its terms.
Specifically, they argue that the city promised to prohibit RV parking at night, and during the day, in limited areas only—essentially between the 101 freeway and the beach. Yet, in the last two years, “No RV Parking” signs have been sprouting up all over town, effectively discriminating against an entire class of vehicles and the people who live in them.
“Our position is the city did not honor the settlement,” said Joe Allen, one of two lawyers for the nonprofit group Homes on Wheels (HOW).
The motion wants the 2007 settlement vacated and HOW’s original lawsuit reinstated. A hearing is scheduled for April 7. To read more, see homelessinsb.org.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
If I want to camp in my RV i have to pay $ to go to a state park or other formal campground. How can these people think it is perfectly fine to treat downtown SB like their own free urban campground? They should have to pay $30 a night like they would if they were camping anywhere else.
DBD (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2011 at 4:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Then everyone would have to pay $30 a night to park their car on the street.
EZK (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2011 at 4:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Agricultural vandalism is up again, and the budget crises is reducing the rural crime task force. Why don't you mobile home folks get a job living in the country helping a working person guard his fields, pumps, engines, tractors and pipe.
shortrees (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2011 at 8:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Riiiight, shortrees. Some RV dweller is gong to approach a farmer and say he'll guard his field equipment. Either the farmer is going to tell him to eff off or call the sheriff to tell them that a protection racket is taking place.
What color is the sky in your universe?
SezMe (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2011 at 1:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Riiiight, DBD. Those wealthy RV dwellers can easily fork over $30/night parking fee. After all, they're living hand-to-mouth because it's fun, doncha know.
What color is the sky in your universe?
SezMe (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2011 at 1:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Please let me know your address SezMe. I'll be by later tonight with my 35' RV. Hope you don't mind me running the generator for a bit. Since I obviously can't afford to pay for anything, you will tell the cops it's ok for me to park in front of your house, right? Oh, and the sky is blue thanks to caring individuals such as yourself.
DBD (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2011 at 9:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
$900/month rent seems pretty steep for a street parking spot ($30/night)
You can get a nice studio apartment with a kitchen, bathroom and full plumbing for that price.
Is it zoning or regulations that prohibits someone from opening an RV park with modest monthly fees?
Maybe $200/month includes the right to dump your waste, and then charge extra for amenities like spots with water and electricity hookups, etc..
loonpt (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2011 at 10:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Driving and owning a RV, or any vehicle, is a privilege not a right. Local Govt can regulate roads and parking as they see fit. This case is without merit and is only a scare tactic against the city, go ahead sue away..
CManSB (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2011 at 11:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow CMan, in what sort of tyrannical universe is being able to own property, travel and sleep not an inherent right of being alive?
Driving IS a right, in fact the right to travel is in the Constitution. You should only LOSE that right when you infringe on the rights of others, hurt someone, damage or steal their property.
If I'm tired, I should be able to pull my car over and go to sleep in a parking space. People with larger vehicles should be able to do that as well.. however, they should also have the option of pulling into a private lot and rent a space for the night where they can be protected from criminals and not be harassed by others in the neighborhood. Obviously there is a need for this type of service in this town, so I'm not sure why it isn't available at a reasonable price. I suggested that perhaps the reason was because of zoning or city regulations.
Back to the original topic, rights were not intended to be something that the government grants, they are something that we are inherently born with. When you give the government the ability to grant rights, then you assume they have the ability to take those rights away. That is a dangerous society you describe, one that will end very badly.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2011 at 12:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
In my universe, the rotten apples don't cause the government to pass a new law. Basically what I meant to say is get a haircut, get off drugs and get a job.
shortrees (anonymous profile)
March 16, 2011 at 6:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)