The plans for a Goleta ice rink skated closer toward completion last week when the city’s Design Review Board met with the rink’s developers on Tuesday to discuss the way the building will look.
“We’re really excited to be here,” said Parker Anderson, chair of the Greater Santa Barbara Ice Skating Association (GSBISA), the nonprofit organization responsible for the project. Saying that the facility is on its “final lap” after a couple of “false starts” — Goleta adopted the plan for the rink in 1997 — Anderson stressed how important the rink will be for locals. “It’s a recreational facility for the citizens of the community that’s affordable,” he said. The arena, he also noted, will be the first rink west of the Mississippi River built to accommodate physically disabled athletes.
The skating facility — to be named “Ice in Paradise” and located at 6985 Santa Felicia Drive near the Camino Real Marketplace — will offer two rinks as well as a snack bar, a rec room, and lockers. Accessible by elevator, a second mezzanine level will allow people to watch the skaters and hockey players. Because the ice has to be kept from melting — the building, the developers said, will be a perpetual 52 degrees — there will be no windows installed on the south side of the structure. Outside, grass and palm trees will add some greenery.
Although members of the Design Review Board (DRB) expressed their satisfaction with seeing the project reach this stage, they did offer the developers some advice as to the facility’s aesthetics. While the developers said that the exterior will look similar to the other buildings in the Camino Real Marketplace — with trellises, earth-toned paint colors, and stonework — some DRB members suggested the facility’s entrance be more embellished and representative of the building’s function.
“This is about play,” said DRB member Cecilia Brown.”It just needs to be fun. There’s no fun to this building. Lighten [it up] in the sense that you make it more interesting to look at.”
Carl Schneider, an architect and DRB member, agreed with his colleague that more could be done but recognized the financial constraints. “In a perfect world, the budget would be unlimited,” he said. “There are a lot of things that could be done to this building.”
Mark Linehan, the developer of Camino Real Marketplace who donated the land for the rink to GSBISA, stressed the importance of being economical, saying that it was important to be “as frugal as we can so that the people can use it” and not have construction costs passed on to them.
In the meantime, the developers will take the suggestions made by the DRB and look for ways to address the aesthetic concerns. They will all meet again on May 22 to further discuss those elements of the project.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Oh geeze now everyone is an architect.....Just build the thing already!
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 10:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
When people we're lobbying for a skatepark they meant skateboards, not ice!
This is California not Wisconsin! If a private company wanted to foot the bill for keeping a large enclosure a constant 52 degrees then go ahead. But as a public creation, an ice skating rink in SoCal is as culturally appropriate as skateboards in Siberia.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 11:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Well Ken doesn't speak for everyone and there is a sizable hockey contingent in this town. I for one am tired of driving to Oxnard twice a week just to play. I'd like to get this thing built asap.
TheEeebs (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 11:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Goleta does not need an ice skating rink. I'd rather our taxes go to support a park or some other public space that would be open to everyone. I appreciate that there are folks out there like The Eeebs who like to play ice hockey, but that doesn't mean that a skate rink should be build on public lands with public support. It would be a better service to the community to put something there with more universal appeal.
Nockamixon (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 12:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Its not public land, its land donated by the owner of the property specifically for this use.
TheEeebs (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 12:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey Eebs, you pay for my surf gear for now on then if you think it's okay for taxpayers to indulge your passions at such an incredibly high price tag. Deal?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 1:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
GYS.
TheEeebs (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 1:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I predict it will be an economic loser and go out of business within a few years.
Not that I dislike the idea of an ice rink. I wish them luck. I just think the novelty will wear off and will the exception of some hot summer days, it will be near empty most of the time.
Botany (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 2:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Does it make sense? I don't know. Seems like a lot of energy will need to be burned to run the rink. Maybe add solar panels on the roof to help run the compressors/lights, offset energy costs, and reduce the carbon footprint?
I just hope some of the at-risk and disadvantaged kids early proponents claimed would be target users actually get a shot at using the rink.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 3:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
In a time when budgets for schools and libraries are being cut, it is a gross mistake.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 4:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The 'Snatch Patch' returns to SB after dying on the Mesa many years ago.
passagerider (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 5:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I remember back in the 90s then City Councilman Tom Roberts would participate in a hockey team that played and practiced on an ice rink at the E. Warren Fairgrounds.
If that rink is still there, why do we need two public rinks?
If it is no longer there, why? Lack of use?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 5:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There seem to be a couple of misconceptions about the rink out there that are driving the criticism of it:
1. Funding: Vast majority of funding is private donations. Goleta did commit some money to the cause, but that was specifically from their parks and rec budget, so it isn't taking from Schools or Libraries. To date, we've raised over 4mm dollars!
2. Appeal: The rink in Oxnard is actually doing quite well. Busy all week in the evenings and all day and night on weekends. Lots of figure skating, well attended open skating (I took my kids to it 3 weeks ago! They loved it) and a healthy youth and adult hockey league.
3. The Ice Patch (the old rink that was on the Mesa) closed: The previous rink in SB was "for profit" and run in an old warehouse that didn't make it sustainable. All new rinks are being designed to be much more energy and resource efficient. Also, it is my understanding that it started out being run b/c one family was interested in having a rink for their daughter to skate at. After she was done, they didn't want to run it and sold the lot for offices. But ask folks if they remember skating there and you get a lot of smiles.
4. Youth/Disabled programs: As a non-profit, it's much easier for the rink to solicit private donations to help out with these. Luckily for us, Santa Barbara has a host of civic minded donors who have been really supportive of these two groups that are being targeted by the rink Board. Check out some of the videos of sled hockey (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfR9g0...). It's really amazing. Hopefully, we'll be a destination rink for tournaments (which might even bring a bit of tax revenue to the town!).
5. Indoor/Year-round activities: Outside of Zodos, try naming a few places for kids to go for structured indoor activities. There really aren't a lot of them in town. Hockey, broomball, skating and curling are fun for all kinds of folks...and there are lots of folks in warm climates like Santa Barbara that love ice sports.
6. Support for sports: Most of the kids who go through the program might not end up as Pro skaters/curlers/hockey players, but the goal is to teach them to be part of a team, learn how to exercise and hopefully, put them on the track to leading a healthy lifestyle.
If anyone is particularly concerned with this project, please don't hesitate to contact the Greater Santa Barbara Ice Skating Association to share those: info@iceinparadise.com
BigD (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 6:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well now I feel like an ass.
I wish someone had taken the time to explain all this before, thanks BigD.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 6:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There is always the Olympic Sport of "Curling", popular in Canada and most of the North Midwest. I may live in Northern Virginia but root for Los Angeles Kings, San Jose Sharks, and Anaheim Ducks, when they come to The DC Hockey Areana and yes I am HATED but what'ever.
I remember the Skating Rink on the Mesa from my 85' High School Grad Party, took the Wheelchair bound kids on the ice (no one ever thought kids on four wheeled chairs could have so much fun and its safer than on skates).
Kudo's to Goleta to be a trail-blazer in such Finacial troubled times.
dou4now (anonymous profile)
May 1, 2012 at 8:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Any facility that promotes family and youth getting out of the house and doing physical activity is always a bonus. Also, neat idea about curling. Something everyone can do. I wish you luck and hope it succeeds!
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
May 2, 2012 at 8:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I wish the government would just get out of their way. Don't give them any subsidies, but don't tell them how to build their rink. They want it to succeed, so they will build to to satisfy their customer base. If their customer base is willing to pay to keep the place 52 degrees and keep up on all the maintenance, then it will stick around. Otherwise it will go out of business and be sold for a better use.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
May 2, 2012 at 10:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I am TOTALLY PSYCHED ABOUT THIS HAPPENING!! Yes. The caps really are necessary. There are SO many people here in Santa Barbara from the east coast and midwest - sleeper cells if you will - who cannot wait for this to finally be built. We take our kids down to Oxnard all the time (and yes, as someone said, it's always rocking with people, even though aesthetically the whole outside area looks like a bombed out abandoned ghost of a shopping plaza... :-) I miss the smell of the ice, the sound of the hockey pucks on the boards, the slight chill on my cheeks and I love that there is at least some remote possibility that my kids will have more experience with that as they grow up as well.
As for "Goleta does not need an ice skating rink. I'd rather our taxes go to support a park or some other public space that would be open to everyone." The funding argument was already well made by BigD (Thanks for that!) but I don't remember the last time I heard someone around here say that they drove their kids down to Oxnard to try to find a public park or space for their kids to play in. Ahem. And I'm pretty sure you're not going to have a lot of people up in North County rallying to come down to find a public park or space. We're pretty well set with those around here, as far as I can tell. :-)
SBres (anonymous profile)
May 3, 2012 at 11:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)