The newly discovered presence of endangered California red-legged frogs and arroyo toads along Agua Caliente Creek in Los Padres National Forest has prompted the closure of Romero Camuesa Road at Divide Peak to all motorized vehicles.
The closure, which is scheduled to remain in effect until August 7, 2013, restricts vehicular access to Rock Camp, Middle Santa Ynez, P-Bar Flats, Mono campgrounds, and the Big Caliente Day Use Area, according to a U.S. Forest Service press release. In April, the Forest Service had closed Romero Camuesa Road from the west crossing to where the it ends near Mono Campground.
“We’re expanding the original closure order to ensure we are doing everything we can to protect these endangered species from further impact,” said Santa Barbara District Ranger John Smith in a prepared statement. “We’ll continue to monitor the stream crossing and, if future biological surveys indicate a reduced presence of these species, we’ll re-open the road to vehicles.”













Previous Month



Comments
I can understand closing the crossing for the frogs, but if that is the case then the FS needs to build a gate on the south side of the crossing and provide ample parking for PEOPLE to mtn bike and hike into the Upper Santa Ynez. Blocking people at Divide Peak will make the Upper Santa Ynez essentially inaccessible for the year. Not acceptable.
BeBe (anonymous profile)
August 9, 2012 at 5:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Occupy Divide Peak"
- Mr. Toad
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 9, 2012 at 6:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'd like to know more before jumping to conclusions or turning this into a "frogs vs. people" issue. Unfortunately, this article just regurgitates a Forest Service press release. Was the previous closure inadequate, and if so, why? Were endangered frogs or toads trampled or killed, prompting the more extensive closure? Does this have less to do with frogs and toads, and more to do with increased fire danger (the Forest Service just announced increased fire restrictions yesterday) or marijuana eradication in the area? There seems to be more to this story than the Forest Service is telling us...
HWheat (anonymous profile)
August 9, 2012 at 11:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
yes, the press release or the story is tantalizing but not too clear...
DrDan (anonymous profile)
August 9, 2012 at 11:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We went camping up there this weekend and got this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYCBgS...
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 9, 2012 at 11:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Too Funny, I fell for that one - LOL
CManSB (anonymous profile)
August 10, 2012 at 12:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The Forest Service is not the enemy at all on this, they are doing what they need to do to help the frogs and cover their behinds. If it is safe for the frogs to have people cross the river on foot then the FS really should move the gate closer to the river. Right now its four miles from where the gate is to the river.
BeBe (anonymous profile)
August 10, 2012 at 8:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm a little suspicious since deer season opens tomorrow. The upper SY is one of my favorite areas to hike so I'm pretty bummed out about this.
Num1UofAn (anonymous profile)
August 10, 2012 at 10:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Seems a bit excessive.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
August 10, 2012 at 10:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I have seen hundreds of them out at Naples.
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
August 10, 2012 at 3:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Glad to see that the Forest Service is on top if things. Go frogs!
banjo (anonymous profile)
August 14, 2012 at 7:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)