Gay Girl Responds to Gay Bashing
Hate Crime in Downtown Santa Barbara
Friday, January 6, 2012
It’s New Year’s Eve, and everything is full of promise. Champagne flows and resolutions are made. After an evening of revelry, one couple heads out into the night. In the crisp air of the brand new year, three men ambush the pair. They shout bigoted slurs as they pummel the couple to the pavement.
This specific couple was comprised of two men, and this specific incident took place on the corner of Chapala and Ortega streets in downtown Santa Barbara. Not in China or Saudi Arabia, but one block from the mall at Paseo Nuevo. And lest anyone think this was not a case of gay bashing, cell phone video of the assault revealed the magnitude of the homophobic slurs. In fact, when police released said video to get the public’s help in apprehending the suspects, the audio was removed. It was that derogatory, that incendiary.
Gay Girl/Straight World
In the wake of the attack, Pacific Pride Foundation (PPF)—Santa Barbara County’s gay resource center and HIV/AIDS service provider—organized a press conference, followed by a march from City Hall to the scene of the crime. As we walked through Santa Barbara’s immaculate downtown, the people in the crowd murmured their surprise that such a hateful attack happened in our hyper-inclusive community. I even overheard one woman say that the assailants must be from out of town.
Santa Barbara is idyllic for many reasons, like our 75-degree Christmases and the fact that our city sits where the mountains meet the sea. We have eight farmers’ markets every week, and community leaders dedicated to promoting tolerance and peace. But Santa Barbara is no Mayberry; after all, we are a real city with real people. Which means real problems.
Hate-fueled crime springs from the well of ignorance and intolerance. And, sadly, that water supply runs across the globe. To think Santa Barbara is immune to such sentiments simply is another form of ignorance—one that may not leave scars, but certainly impedes growth. If we fool ourselves into thinking hatred doesn’t exist here, we won’t be dedicated to doing the hard work of talking about it and addressing its roots. And without that conversation, we can’t hope to prevent it from inciting violence.
At the beginning of 2011, PPF instigated sensitivity training with the Santa Barbara Police Department. The organization partnered with another nonprofit, Just Communities, to create the LGBT Sensitivity and Awareness Trainings. In fall 2011, the entire SBPD underwent the orientation.
One of the detectives assigned to the hate crime case approached PPF’s Executive Director David Selberg at the recent press conference. The detective explained that, as a result of the sensitivity training, he better understood the nuances of working with a gay couple involved in an assault. By acknowledging the need to be prepared in the event of hate-induced crime, Selberg facilitated the ability to be prepared. Santa Barbara may be a community that doesn’t tolerate hate, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be prepared in the event it crops up.
These sensitivity trainings are one example of working to combat ignorance on a large scale. The passage of the Matthew Shepard Act, which expands the federal hate crime law to include provisions about sexual orientation, or the repeal of the military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy are other instances of this type of macro work.
But sometimes the most revolutionary—and effective—work happens on a micro level in our daily lives with our neighbors, at the market, and while picking up the kids from school. Raising awareness is what conquers ignorance in the long run, and it starts by talking about your partner at work or holding hands as you walk through your neighborhood.
After we walked to the scene of the crime, Rev. Julia Hamilton of the Unitarian Society led us in a moment of silence. She told us to hold hands with our neighbor, explaining it was a simple gesture that symbolized we should never be ashamed of who we are.
It was in that moment that Santa Barbara showed it was no place for hate.
4•1•1
On Sunday, January 8, come out to the Wildcat Bar & Lounge (15 W. Ortega St.) to show your support for the victims. There will be a $5 cover, with proceeds going toward a reward fund to help catch the three attackers. If you can’t come out Sunday night but still want to contribute, visit any Santa Barbara Bank & Trust branch and make a donation to the LoveBeforeHate fund.
Related Links
Comments
First of all, let me say that I condemn this attack and that it's NEVER right to attack or harass anyone for ANY reason. Whoever did this (assuming they are caught) should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. There are however, two things that I'd like to share: First of all, my outrage at such an attack is the same whether the motivation is sexual orientation, robbery, or if the motivation of the attacker/s is their belief that their neighbors' dog told them the victim was the devil. Secondly, while the Matthew Shepard attack was largely purported to be a "hate" crime, the following link to an ABC news report (hardly a crackpot right-wing anti-gay news source) strongly suggests otherwise. http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2...
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 6, 2012 at 3:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr. Clausen, the only point I can glean from your comments is a suggestion that a hate crime is no different than any other assault. In other words, any act of violence against another person (war being a different debate) is equally evil and wrong. I assume you want to make this point in order to stick to a "colorblind" perspective on diversity?
However, in the case of hate crimes there is a long legal history in this country (a nation of laws as we are often reminded by immigration border hawks) that disagrees with your perspective. The reasoning for this is precisely because a hate crime is an attack directed at the entire group of people rather than just an individual. A hate crime is committed not just to bash a gay or lynch a black person, it is committed to strike fear into the entire respective group, to terrorize them, to give the attacking group more power over the victims. You may question whether the Shepard attack was a hate crime, but the point is moot in light of attacks like the one that recently happened here in Santa Barbara. To suggest that anyone should react to this attack as if it is just another assault by an angry neighbor or a mugging does little more than deepen the sense of ignorance expressed by the woman at the rally who couldn’t believe it could happen here.
Num1UofAn (anonymous profile)
January 7, 2012 at 11:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
George Ied was from Syria, was it not a Hate Crime that he was killed by Latino Gang Members?
You know he did not belong in their hood.
The man with colored skin slashed on State Street was that not a Hate Crime?
Gays have been beaten in IV for years.
Santa Barbara is by the culture of its Politics a "Victim Zone".
Why because ordinary people cannot fight back and the thugs know this.
The County Sheriff has a policy of not issuing LTC, License to Carry, to law abiding tax paying citizens, one of the reasons I personally boycott Downtown Santa Barbara.
The Pink Pistols, members of the LGBT Community, refuse to be victims and through the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution actively support the use of deadly force to protect themselves.
Maybe its time for members of the Local LGBT Community to assert and standup for their Civil Rights when it comes to violence against them?
How about demand that Santa Barbara County be "Shall Issue" to every law abiding Citizen, maybe the thugs will think twice before attacking?
For more information on asserting your Natural Right of Self Defense, check out the Pink Pistols on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pink-Pi...
Stop being Victims.
I sincerely hope that the two men that were beaten recover and the slime responsibly are held accountable.
howgreenwasmyvalley (anonymous profile)
January 7, 2012 at 2:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"You may question whether the Shepard attack was a hate crime"
It wasn't me who questioned it, it is a mountain of evidence presented by a reputable news source.
As for the woman who couldn't believe it could happen here: Do you see a connection between the alcohol-fueled environment of downtown (supported by the "progressive" academics who blithely ignore the impact the bars have on those who live/work down there) and how this could happen? This crime may have been a pre-planned one, or it could have been a random act by a couple of throwaway kids, but violence and fights downtown is nothing new.
I will admit that what bothers me is how for SO MANY years bullying has been an epidemic yet all of a sudden it comes to the fore that gay students are bullied and only now is this topic being raised. How nice it would have been if all along these people had stood up to ALL sorts of bullying?
On another seemingly digressive note: I feel the same way about special enhancement laws when a police officer gets murdered. Why is a police officers' life worth more than that of a convenience store worker?
You can subdivide motives for attacks, bullying, or any other form of harassment, but when existing laws are applied equally, then our society send the message that all people are of equal value.
"To suggest that anyone should react to this attack as if it is just another assault by an angry neighbor or a mugging "
Are you convinced that all muggings are just that?...and never have racial motives?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 7, 2012 at 3:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@HGWMV: I had totally forgotten about the Pink Pistols. This is one more group in addition to Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership (www.jpfo.org) and the 2nd amendment sisters (www.2asisters.org) that dispels the lie that people who are in favor of the right to arm oneself are testosterone-crazed Rednecks. Of course the Left-wing leanings of Santa Barbara's Political Machine would probably not dare touch that one with a ten-foot-pole, but maybe I'm wrong on that count.
@Num1UofAn: You posted "I assume you want to make this point in order to stick to a "colorblind" perspective on diversity?" You've raised an interesting point which I will address.
I am what (for lack of a better term) one might call an "old school liberal". What that means is that my view on race/gender/social issues is more in line with the way my parents and their friends who came of age in the '50's and '60's felt. They/myself believe/believed that the best way to address injustice was to enable those who are oppressed, be they women, Blacks, whatever. I am very aware of what goes on, and while I know that our society isn't colorblind, the term colorblind once upon a time meant the idea of people of all races living together and not judging each other by the color of their skin; today however, the term has been hijacked to mean someone who is ignorant of injustice.
Giving people special status by "hate crimes" legislation only will increase resentment against them. In a colorblind society (by the old definition) people of any race, sexual orientation, or whatever demographic/label one wishes to affix to the same, can expect to receive the same degree of justice when they are wronged. In the old days, there was legislation *against* groups of people, and the goal of the 60's civil rights movement was to bring people together as one, not to harp on our differences.
Having said this, I realize that there is much identity-politics wrapped up in this. Some people simply cannot let go of their victim status so rather than empower people, it's easier to keep dividing us. There is also much money wrapped up in this as well. David Selberg was making at least $76,000 annually the last time I checked.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 8, 2012 at 2:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@billclausen: "It wasn't me who questioned it, it is a mountain of evidence presented by a reputable news source."
The article did not present a "mountain of evidence". It presented conflicting opinions by those closely tied to the case - and only suggested that targeting of Matthew Shepard by McKinney and Price was not entirely based on his sexual orientation, but, in addition, by other factors such as meth use and the need for drug money.
EatTheRich (anonymous profile)
January 8, 2012 at 10:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Isn't beating the crap out of ANYBODY peacefully walking down the street ALREADY a crime? Is there a reason the EXISTING laws aren't being enforced, and that we must pass yet more laws designating some human beings as more worthy than others? Why? Can someone tell me why a gay couple deserve more consideration and more outrage than a straight couple?
SB is a gang-infested cesspool. It is also one big bar. Violent crimes are illegal no matter WHO the victim is. Enforce the law. Stop dividing people. Everyone has the same right to live their lives peacefully and without fear. Period.
Holly (anonymous profile)
January 9, 2012 at 12:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)