A Santa Barbara Superior Court judge denied a request from defense attorney Darryl Genis to hold a hearing on whether or not to sanction a prosecutor and two police officers for what he claimed were violations of court orders. Judge Brian Hill said Wednesday morning that there was no violation of his order by Deputy District Attorney Justin Greene or Santa Barbara police officers Kasi Beutel and Mark Corbett, who are married.
Genis, in documents filed with the court, said Greene, Corbett, and Beutel violated a court order that all potential witnesses be excluded from the courtroom during a recent DUI trial. Greene was the prosecutor in the case, while Beutel was one of his main witnesses. Corbett sat in the courtroom for much of Beutel’s testimony. Hill noted that Corbett wasn’t listed as a witness or potential witness on either the prosecution or defense witness lists. Genis pointed out that during a pretrial hearing, Hill had Corbett step out of the courtroom while Beutel was on the stand. But Hill disagreed that meant Corbett was not allowed to be present in the courtroom during trial. Corbett was taking notes during Beutel’s testimony and during a break could be seen talking with his wife. Genis said that from looking at the notes — which the court seized — it was clear Corbett was coaching Beutel on her testimony. While those notes are sealed, both attorneys have seen them.
But Corbett’s mere presence in the courtroom was not a question of violating a court order, Hill said, but a question of misconduct. During the trial, Hill held a hearing after Genis made the allegation of witness coaching. While he found no misconduct had occurred, he did give Greene a talking-to. Hill said it “amounted to an appearance of impropriety. I don’t think there was anything substantive.” Genis said that when the notes are unsealed, “It will be apparent that Officer Corbett lied to the court.” The hearing came a couple of weeks after Genis was sanctioned by the same judge for three violations of court orders. In his request filed with the judge, Genis said that “to neglect to hold all parties’ feet to the same fire with the same intensity just reeks of unacceptable bias.” Greene, meanwhile, said he was pleased with Hill’s “appropriate” decision. [Full disclosure: Greene was represented in court by fellow Deputy DA Michael Carrozzo, who is currently this reporter’s professor for a summer class at the Santa Barbara College of Law.]


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Chris, don't you mean partial disclosure? Did you neglect to say that the Judge you are reporting on (and portraying as fair) Brian Hill teaches Constitutional Law at your law school and that is a required subject which you will be required to take from him in the comming year? Don't you also need to disclose that Joyce Dudley THE DA of Santa Barbara teaches there as do several of her top ranking Deputies such as Arnie Tolks and others? Don't you also need to disclose your hope and expectation of receiving as a DDA there after graduating, and passing the Bar?
DarrylGenis (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2012 at 7:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hmmm...small world.
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2012 at 9:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Gee, Judge Hill decided against Mr. Genis. What an enormous surprise! When do I get to vote against this prejudiced prig?
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2012 at 9:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Darryl, I didn't know you were a mind reader! Wow!
Moonrunner (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2012 at 11:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So now there's a SB College of Law mafia out there? Oh, the horror.
LegendaryYeti (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2012 at 12:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm not well educated in the law but I do know quite a bit about mental health issues. Not saying Mr. Genis has serious problems with paranoia, but it does appear he's a bit conspiratorial here. I would think this is all lawyer games until he starts insinuating Mr. Meagher is part of it in the comment section.
Just saying... I wouldn't be surprised to find out Mr Genis owns a well stocked bunker.
Validated (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2012 at 1:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Alas, like so many of us (me included), Mr. Genis simply suffers from an over inflated view of his own abilities, skills, intellectual capacity, and worth. Unfortunately, his choice of professions (defending drunk drivers) does not lend itself to humility and self-examination. He has to be all in or he loses this twisted game of poker. I am just thankful that I am not him.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2012 at 9:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Darryl again loses in court.... Nothing new here just another standard day for Darryl. Darryl has been losing like this for years. Darryl's delusions seem to spill over into reality sometimes and he feels the need to post on them. Go back to sleep Darryl and don't forget to pay your $3000 fine....
deniseL (anonymous profile)
July 27, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I do hope Mr. Meagher responds to these allegations, which are journalistically serious. I have a friend who teaches there, and friends who've graduated from that school, and no ax to grind either way.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
July 28, 2012 at 7:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What allegations, exactly? That I am going to law school? I've never hidden that fact. Anytime I've covered an event with one of my professors involved I think I've also disclosed that fact.
Joyce Dudley hasn't taught there since I started attending. And as far as I know, Arnie Tolks teaches in Ventura, which is not my campus. I haven't had Judge Hill as a professor yet. When I do, I will disclose that. I don't disagree that I shouldn't. But am I expected to disclose every person I may one day have contact with?
Also, I'm glad Mr. Genis has managed to figure out my career path choice, because I have not. I don't even know if I want to practice as an attorney, not to mention be a prosecutor, or a prosecutor in the SB DA's office.
If he has a problem with the judge's decision-making, that's one thing. If he has a problem with my coverage, I'd encourage him to make that argument, not try to make connections that don't really exist.
Chris (Chris Meagher)
July 29, 2012 at 1:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Chris reported on the Peter Lance case at a time when Carrazzo was part of the. Prosecution team without any disclosure, which is why I find it curious that he said: "Anytime I've covered an event with one of my professors involved I THINK I've disclosed that fact."
Also, as a journalist you say: "I don't disagree that I shouldnt. (disclose a conflict). Don't disagree is a double negative then shouldn't is added, which means you do disagree.
DarrylGenis (anonymous profile)
July 29, 2012 at 2:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Uhm.. the very allegations you succinctly responded to, thanks.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
July 29, 2012 at 2:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
In my opinion, DarrylGenis is 'going for the capillaries' on this one.
LegendaryYeti (anonymous profile)
July 30, 2012 at 10:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Lol Yeti.
Chris don't pay much attention to Ken_volok he is an Internet troll more than seriously asking.
To Darryl Genis DUI Lawyer in Santa Barbara do you honestly think someone else is always the cause of your problems?
I heard through the grapevine Darryl Genis that you had previously been held in contempt of court in Ventura County. Can you comment? Is that true? Care to explain?
deniseL (anonymous profile)
July 30, 2012 at 8:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm beginning to feel harassed by DeniseL.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
July 30, 2012 at 8:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
...says the blog stalker who posts 10 minutes after me...
deniseL (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2012 at 9:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@deniseL why not mellow out and keep to the topic, in your case bashing Genis, or anyone like Ken V with whom you disagree. Your lack of civility in this and other threads is really unpleasant [internet troll, blog stalker] and harms civil discourse. Mellow out.
DrDan (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2012 at 6:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow DrDan who are you to attack me like that? You don't know me, I am entitled to my opinion. Your lack of maturity is amazing, don't act so childish.
I call it like I see it. I take offense to self serving pontificers. If you are offended then maybe you should question what you are about. I am an educated independent woman, if I offend you then you should stop being sexist!
deniseL (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2012 at 9:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nightmare.
lawdy (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2012 at 9:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
pontificaters? Pontifex Maximus? Churlish, to say the least.
DrDan (anonymous profile)
August 1, 2012 at 11:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Who's afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2012 at 12:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I am, as is Edward Albee.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2012 at 2:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
One liner trolls? Maybe?
deniseL (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2012 at 9:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
so who is the blog stalker?
DrDan (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2012 at 8:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
DeniseL is in reality ... Helen Reddy!?
DarrylGenis (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 8:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Darryl Genis Santa Barbara DUI Attorney,
You often promise your clients the stars but rarely win your cases in court. You blame others (as evident here on these blogs) that it was their fault and not yours when you lose in court. So far you have blamed the cops, the DA, the judge, and now this reporter Chris Meagher when things don't go your way. Your conspiracy theories are wearing thin.
I really hope potential clients do their homework on you and realize you lose your cases a lot more then you win. People would be better off spending less on a more competent attorney that invests their time in actually defending their clients instead of running PR campaigns for themselves in the local media. But, I guess it is good advertising for you then huh?
You never answered my question about your contempt of court violation in Ventura County. Was that true? I take it by your lack of response that it was.
deniseL (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 3 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Of course, he’s not making out too badly himself. Genis works on three to 10 DUI cases a day; fees range from $4,500 to $12,000 for misdemeanor arrests."
Boy Darryl how do you devote dedicated time when you are working on that many cases a DAY? Sounds like you are rolling in the MONEY? I wonder what your motivation is?
deniseL (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 3:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Darryl Genis (Santa Barbara DUI Attorney) on your website you claim that you were admitted to the California State Bar in "November of 1980".
http://www.winyourdui.com/santa_barba...
Yet the State Bar shows your record of admittance as December 16th, 1980.
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Memb...
Now did you lie on your website or did you error in a very important detail? Without being in the State Bar you could not practice law in California. You know this very well being a lawyer. You are also very aware that details are important when it comes to claiming experience in your career. I hope this was just an error on your part and not a true misrepresentation of the facts. But it makes a person wonder about someone that is supposed to be so good at the details can error on this REALLY important DETAIL.
deniseL (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 3:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yawn.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 3:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ok stalker, like you really check this posting? It is apparent that you are checking on what I am posting just to stalk me. What a creep weirdo. Oh wait that is right...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80OJ2B...
... you are in real life.
deniseL (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 3:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Gee, thanks for pointing out such an important fact from 33 or 34 years ago. The bar results came out in late November, as I recall so I was licensed, but not sworn in until December 16.
And just in case you are wondering, I did not make any appearances or otherwise 'practice' until sworn in.
You really do have way too much time on your hands DeniseL
DarrylGenis (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2012 at 9:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Have to admit, I've often wondered why the Indy doesn't impose some limit to the number of comments by an individual per day?
I know, "free speech," one's "right to expression" etc., But it sometimes does seem a bit obsessive on the part of some people and a bit off-putting to see such daily dominance of this forum by so few.
I'm not sure where the "troll" demarcation line lies, but I know that I read the online comments less frequently than I did previously.
zappa (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 8:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So Darryl Genis DUI attorney in Santa Barbara. Did you lie or just make a great mistake?
And what about you being held in contempt of court in Ventura? You are not denying it... what happened Darryl? Another Judge do something wrong?
deniseL (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 12:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
And 1980 was 32 year ago, I guess math is a weak point for you....LOL. Not 33 or 34. Again a lie or mistake Darryl?
deniseL (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 12:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Zappa, perhaps limiting to one comment and two rebuttals per article.. adding a "like" tab would suffice me in most cases.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 2:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree with Zappa, the people who only post to annoy others, one word postings, or constantly do little to enhance this discussion ruin it for me.
Ken, you are one of those people. You have posted here 6 times. none of your comments are about the story or what others are commenting on. You do nothing to enhance this topic. Nothing personal, and I am not trying to offend you. But your post above and before made me have to point out the elephant in the room.
Dale1210 (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 2:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well you succeeded in offending me because you obviously don't see the context nor wish to.
Forgive us with something to say, sans vendettas or personal attacks.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 3:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If I offended you then I am sorry that you have a fragile ego. But here is just an observation on your postings here, of the seven posts none of them are on the original article. Your first is rudely directed towards the author and then your second is baited with sarcasm at him. Your remaing five are just about other posters.
Dale1210 (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 8:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Rudely directed towards the author" , by hoping he responds to bad accusations? Sorry to interrupt your vendetta, and expose your hypocrisy with sarcasm.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 9:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
deniseL (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 9:58 p.m.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 10:10 p.m.
deniseL, who is stalking whom? Yawn.
DrDan (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2012 at 11:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Okay, we're done with this off-topic bickering.
webadmin (webadmin)
August 5, 2012 at 11:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let's talk about macrame.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2012 at 3:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What! Did DarrylGenis make an error?! Impossible! It has to be someone else's fault!
LegendaryYeti (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2012 at 11:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)