“Third Lane Is Third Rail”? This metaphor headlining a recent article in Santa Barbara Independent brings to mind a 2010 article titled “Third Lane is a Train.” A train and a lane, a lane and a train, either way they work well together.
To me, the “Third Lane is Third Rail” article reads like rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic. There’s not much to choose from, and the completion date of the widening (provided the economy recovers) is well into the 2020s. I’m looking for a congestion solution in the near term, such as Gene Skoropowski, consultant to the rail corridors organization (LOSSAN) recommended. We’re talking three to four years, and that makes sense.
This is why the City of Goleta is following up on Skoropowski’s recommendation for moving the Goleta train platform north of its current location – in order for it be convenient for commuters from Ventura, who do not currently have a peak-hour rail option, as the earliest train from the south passes through Goleta at 10:30 a.m. Many Goleta and Santa Barbara employees can’t wait! A commuter train could happen sooner than you think – way sooner than the third lane.
How will it be paid for? In addition to the $25 million in seed money in Measure A for commuter rail, other sources of money are available. There are currently two sources of funds being applied for, including a $1.2 million grant for Jobs Access Reverse Commute (familiarly known as JARC), which is exactly what the Ventura-to-Goleta commuter rail service is all about.
The jobs center around the area near Los Carneros and 101, where many commuters from Ventura County are driving to. Then there’s the portion of UCSB’s thousands of employees who commute from the south, as well as many of the students.
The advocacy group CoastalRailNow came about because I thought it was a no-brainer to add a couple of peak-hour train runs from Ventura to Goleta. As a participant in the “101 In Motion” process, I worked hard to keep commuter rail in play as an option, and when the studies were done, rail was right there with a lane, in its ability to carry nearly the same number of commuters. I’ve learned what the obstacles are to adding trains to the corridor, and why the statewide organization I belong to, Rail Passengers Association of California (RailPAC) created this petition. Please visit the link, and if you agree with its premise, add your name to the list of people who would like more rail service on the coastal corridor. There’s no reason for commuters to be stuck in traffic, unless they have no viable option – which is what rail represents, a viable option. As the eternal optimist, I believe the right thing will be done, and people will have the options they deserve.
If you want to experience what rail travel is like, come to the National Train Day celebration at the Santa Barbara train station, 209 State Street, this Saturday, May 12, at 9 a.m. Board the southbound Surfliner at 9:20 and ride to Carpinteria. Board the northbound Surfliner at 10 a.m., and you’ll be back at the Santa Barbara station at 10:15. Listen to local leaders speak about regional transportation at the 10:30 a.m. press conference, and then enjoy the festivities. There’ll be magic by Mark Collier, food by Omni Fresco Catering, and train-cookie decorating for the kids, courtesy of Fresco Café. The model railroad layout will take you back to your childhood, and Ken Kelly has brought his best stuff this year, even a model of the train station and the famous Moreton Bay fig tree.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
I won't consider another train ride until they stop pushing the trains, rather than pulling them. Pushing the train is unsafe. You don't want to have a locomotive coming along behind you if you hit something.
pnortonsb (anonymous profile)
May 10, 2012 at 9:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Whether the locomotive is in front or back, the engineer controls the locomotive from the front. It's common practice, and the safety record of passenger trains in either push or pull configuration is excellent.
GlennYago (anonymous profile)
May 10, 2012 at 7 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There are also many low cost single car configurations on the market which are designed for low quality freight train tracks. Yes, one would need to increase the number of 'bus stop ' sidings.
Trains aren't as flexible as buses when it comes to changing routes to match demand. But if one focuses on transportation as a portfolio of options, trains can play a useful role since the corridors are already there.
On one hand, I hate to see govt. operating subsidies. But I don't mind one time procurements if the govt run business would operate on it's own. But on the other hand, if we payAs long as there is a national strategy in mind.
populations will just keep growing and one needs to plan for the long haul. (sorry, no pun intended)
passagerider (anonymous profile)
May 11, 2012 at 2:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
As we know, there are no government run businesses able to stand on their own. The concept Is inherently flawed because it always becomes political. Roads are a government run operation, and with the Highway Act of 1956, passenger rail was dealt its final blow as a competitive mode. Since private entities own most of the countries rail network, government is reluctant to invest the money needed to make it viable for passenger use. And, just as the government has no energy plan, there is also no national strategy for transportation......except to put the majority of transportation dollars into roads.....where the big dollars from special interests are.
GlennYago (anonymous profile)
May 11, 2012 at 11:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)