Page 2 of 7
Posted on April 8 at 10:15 p.m.
@Validated, The Mayor has said that the initiatives apply to future contracts. By the way public school teachers are required to pay their full employee contribution. So I am guessing these initiatives will standup in court.
On Mayor Gets Mixed Messages on Initiative Package
Posted on March 31 at 10:09 a.m.
"...the same woman who recently joined the Board majority and refused to take the lead role in fixing ADMHS? Kicking it back to staff after staff came to them asking for their help in solving the $3,000,000 gap?..."
Actually the Board asked ADMHS staff to come back with cuts that don't impact direct services. Good for them. Year after year we have seen cuts to direct services. When you cut direct services to the mentally ill it impacts the entire community. We've seen enough cuts to direct services. If you follow that department you know there are some mid-level bureaucrats we could do with out.
On Pappas Raises More Cash Than Farr
Posted on March 29 at 9:33 a.m.
My guess is Ken was fine when the Board fired Mike Brown.
On Longtime Homeless Advocate Retires
Posted on February 13 at 12:30 p.m.
I disagree with Eckermann. There are non-profit housing providers that do this very well. This is an example of a public/private partnership gone very bad.
On Stupid, Inept, or Corrupt?
Posted on January 24 at 5:25 p.m.
I wouldn't dismiss the claims of the homeless or advocates so quickly. If you follow this issue at all you know that cities and counties have ended up on the loosing end of a lawsuit for the destruction of homeless property. The homeless have the same rights as everyone else. Not only is this a property issue it can also amount to unreasonable search and seizure and violate constitutional rights. It's good these deputies are being investigated. I don't want my tax dollars paying to defend those who violate the rights of our most vulnerable residents.
On Sheriff's Office Investigates Two Deputies
Posted on January 14 at 10:30 a.m.
These affordable rental units will have a positive impact on the community. The property will be improved and well maintained by the Housing Authority. ("Why Affordable Housing Does Not Lower Property Values" at http://www.habitat.org/how/propertyva...). These units will also help numerous individuals.This type of affordable housing is critical to vulnerable people who are disabled (physically or mentally) and the elderly. And I DO feel good about helping disabled and elderly people off the streets and in to housing. Permanent Supportive Housing is an evidence-based practice. This determination includes resident stability, evidence of greater impacts over alternatives and evidence of cost benefits. For more information about Permanent Supportive Housing and evidence-based and promising practices, visithttp://www.samhsa.gov
On City Breaks Ground on New Affordable Housing
Posted on September 2 at 4:07 p.m.
Lack of housing (density) also equals more cars on the road --in the form of commuters from Ventura and Lompoc. An insufficient number housing units brings all sorts of other problems too. It is clear that housing can be designed that is attractive and helps meets our communities needs.
On I Yap, Therefore I Yam
Posted on August 16 at 12:51 p.m.
Democrats may "hold a 12-point voter registration advantage over Republicans in the new district" but with friends like Pedro Nava I'm still worried!
On All In
Posted on August 3 at 9:53 p.m.
You only have to walk down State Street in the early morning to see the mental health system is failing. People who can't take care of themselves live on our streets. Don't direct your anger at people who are homeless. Direct it at the people who make the decisions.
On ADMHS Responds to the Grand Jury
Posted on July 25 at 7:44 p.m.
Good lawyers??? I must made a contribution to: http://www.foodbanksbc.org/foodfromth...And will clean out my pantry tonight!
On Santa Barbara Women Lawyers First Annual Food from the Bar Food & Funds Drive Through July 31