Comments by WilliamMunny

Previous | Page 2 of 5 | Next

Posted on May 9 at 1:33 p.m.

Unfortunately Goss is right. You can go by there on any given day and there are usually anywhere from 6-12 homeless people and their shopping carts. Any improvements made to this spot will be for the sole benefit of the homeless people there until Homeless, Inc. and the SB Housing Authority stop exacerbating the homeless problem in this town. Good luck seeing that happen in our lifetime.....

On Ping Pong for Library Plaza?

Posted on October 31 at 3 p.m.

I too am a pretty informed voter and have to agree that I couldn't vote for Murillo under any circumstances. I'd rather have a split 3-3 council that would result in deadlock than have Murillo be the one casting the deciding vote. Both Murillo and her "irascible" husband (and that is putting it nicely) need to stay as far away from any position of authority as possible.

On The (Mosh) Pit and the Pendulum

Posted on July 1 at 4:48 p.m.

Deferring salary increases is a joke. Am I missing something or does the County think there is a pot of gold at the end of the 2012 rainbow?

Another joke: They can't cash out 40 hours in accrued vacation this year? Guess what that means......they just keep it in their accounts and then add it to their compensation when they retire for purposes of calculating their pension benefits.

On County Strikes Deals with Union Groups

Posted on June 30 at 10:37 a.m.

While a total waste to use the RDA funds for the police station, it seems it would be better than to continue using them for the SB Housing Authority to buy housing for the homeless. The real problem is the RDA funds aren't being spent on anything that in any way improves blight in SB or results in a higher tax base down the road, which is the underlying justification for RDA funds.

On Police Station Public Enemy #1

Posted on March 25 at 2:27 p.m.

Crazy thing is most of the business owners who cry foul when Dickson lists their places as for sale are quietly going around letting people know their business is for sale. Just because they don't put up a big "For Sale" sign in the front yard doesn't mean they aren't desperately trying to get someone/anyone to make an offer to take their restaurant off their hands. They just don't want it publicized because of the potential loss in sales if customers think you're going out of business. Understandble they'd be concerned but not acceptable to trash Dixon's efforts in an attempt to maintain the charade.

Somehow I doubt Ronchietto will be calling Dixon to apologize for accurately reporting: the restaurant was sold, who bought it and the end date for Cafe Buenos Aires

On Cafe Buenos Aires <em>Not</em> Sold, Says Owner

Posted on March 4 at 1:33 p.m.

If there was a time the RDA funds were being used wisely in Santa Barbara, it surely isn't still going on now. Now the housing authority is using that money to purchase housing for the homeless. How does that improve the property values in the surrounding areas? After all, that is how the use of RDA funds is justified......they remove the blight which ultimately increases property taxes, which is why its justified to spend tax dollars to benefit private and non-profit businesses.

Das is right to ask the local mayors to tone down the rhetoric. Are the mayors going to complain when the other services suffer additional cuts because they refused to cooperate in the budget process or will they acknowledge that their refusal to do away with the RDAs only contributed to the problem?

And no, it is not a waste of time to discuss the corruption. All of the social services agencies and non-profits in town that elected Schneider are the very ones with their hands out asking for money to purchase buildings so their programs can operate with artificially low office/space expenses and inflated salaries. All the while not benefiting a single taxpayer in the process. The people who don't want to look under those rocks are most likely in on it or ignorantly furthering that agenda.

On How Now Bow-Wow?

Posted on March 4 at 10:31 a.m.

I get the feeling at some point someone was kicked out of Elings Park or his was dog denied a license or something like that. Can't wait to hear about all the drunk driving arrests that have come from people who were at the Park. Probably shouldn't hold my breath waiting for something from someone with zero credibility.

On Bikes and Brides

Posted on January 14 at 12:05 p.m.

Anyone whose ever had to dumpster dive for a kids toy can definitely feel for your husband. Once you're in the dumpster, there is no way you're leaving without what you went in there for in the first place. Only bigger disappointment than the look on a kid's face when they realize their beloved toy/stuffed animal has been tossed away is the look on their face if you come out of the dumpster unvictorious.

Great article...thanks for sharing.

On Memories of the Miramar

Posted on January 14 at 11:07 a.m.

Glad to see people had the good sense to point out the real problem here. While the "sand in the fountain" claim may have been a bit of a stretch, the bottom line is this guy is a pretty surly panhandler who feels its his right to use public property for his own benefit.

Can't wait to see him there in a six months still trying to "sort out" his class schedule. No way this guy leaves town. I'm also guessing he doesn't stop dipping his bucket into the fountain.

On Sandman Leaving Town After Citation

Posted on December 15 at 1:49 p.m.

Despite all the speculation, Rowse's own comments appear to put him somewhere in the middle of the spectrum and able to jump party lines to support individual candidates or issues.

And Pritchett's belief that he's entitled to know Rowse's future intentions regarding the next election is absurd. Hopefully neither Rowse nor the rest of the council will make decisions based on who is running in the next election. We need to address our problems now, not wait until the future.

On Rowse in the House

Previous | Page 2 of 5 | Next

event calendar sponsored by: