Comments by anemonefish

Previous | Page 2 of 11 | Next

Posted on April 6 at 3:44 p.m.

The difference between Fiesta - love it or hate it - and these 'spontaneous' social networked bashes is that the Fiesta at least has responsible people organizing, planning, and working with public safety agencies, not in opposition to them. It's natural for kids to rebel against authority and go into "don't tell me what to do" mode, and to be over confident that they've got it covered when they can't possibly.

But there are some real permanent residents trying to make lives in I.V., not just student renters laying waste - and each other - while only passing through. The county has duties to protect their peace and property, too. It's a permanent urban community, not transitory student housing or South Padre Island. The full-time residents and property owners have a right to live without fear of fair-weather riots and vandalism when irresponsible "come one, come all" invites are broadcast.

If such events as the Halloween thing and this one are going to be permitted, then maybe a visit by some reps of the New Orleans PD are in order to share ideas on managing drunk and rowdy crowds without inciting them to self-righteous indignation. At the least the UCSB administration needs to step up, along with local beer and wine merchants, property owners, law enforcement, and residents to sort lessons learned from this disgraceful showing and structure future UCSB/I.V. festivals more like the organized chaos that is Fiesta than the mess these alcohol-fueled mobs continue to create.

On Deltopia Party Devolves Into Isla Vista Riot

Posted on March 28 at 10:48 a.m.

" was “dramatically downsized” due to the tribal environmental review process." Well, the environment is in more trouble now than it was in 2004 with too many people; too much vehicle traffic (with special thanks to the Chumash along with the wineries); and not enough water to go around. Current consumption levels are not sustainable, and the situation becomes catastrophic if the climate gets dryer. Adding more water consumers is regional suicide. Where did that much-hyped Native American eco-consciousness go, or the respect for the earth attributed to these guys' ancestors? What besides capitalist greed by an extended-family corporation could rationalize up-scaling this casino, in this place, to mini-Vegas proportions? If the reconstituted tribe gets their way yet again, the Camp 4 land won't become shareholder housing, a bingo hall, and/or the Chumash, Inc. golf course; it will just be overflow parking lot #5.

On Chumash Want More Gamblers and Guests

Posted on February 25 at 8:51 a.m.

Very informative piece. Thanks. As bikes get more popular, it's nice to understand the differences (and challenges) of different styles. Sounds like a fixie - as compared with the one-speeds I rode as a kid - demands quick reflexes and considerable strength to handle responsibly. Can't honestly imagine riding anything without brakes in congested areas.

On The Fixie Phenomenon

Posted on February 8 at 10:37 a.m.

Michael Rymer's film, "Face to Face," screened at the SBIFF a couple of years ago. Based on a David Williamson play, it depicts a compacted restorative justice session using the methodology Dr. David Moore and others have implemented widely in the Australian state of Victoria and in other locales, including Baltimore. The process, called "conferencing," applies when a dispute has escalated to become a conflict, even a violent one. So it works in criminal cases, but also in the workplace, in families, and even inside political organizations to bring the impacted parties to a conflict together to sort through the perspectives, explore reasoning and motives, look at consequences, and come up with a plan for resolution, follow-through, and closure. The facilitation of a conference is a readily teachable skill, and it's great to hear that Santa Barbara is looking to add this powerful option. We participated in a training with David Moore in Oz last summer and hope more people here look into it as an alternative to the traditional criminal justice solutions which so often solve nothing.

On Restorative Justice Revisited

Posted on February 6 at 1:21 p.m.

As the drought moves us closer to recycling water from the waste treatment plants for drinking, dumping drug residues and oddball gene-modifying chemicals into the sewer systems really matters. Think costs equivalent to desalination for removing those man-made pharma-pollutants because conventional filters won't. Using gray water for landscaping and irrigating foodstuffs will be - probably already is - a genetic gamble. The petro-chemical age has brought big new problems along with benefits.

On The Dog that Didn't Bark

Posted on January 11 at 9:57 a.m.

Getting back to the original topic, let it be said that proponents of the gang injunction are often too intimidated by the presence of gang members, their girlfriends, parents, boyfriends, and fans who benefit from Gangs, Inc., to attend public meetings, much less to speak up. They don't want to be targeted personally; they already feel threatened. Sometimes they're kin. And the danger is real. It takes a lot of courage - sometimes foolhardiness - to risk family and property, even life, by standing up openly against gangsters whose tactics of choice are payback, revenge, and retribution. The cops can offer them little protection, and the consequences the legal system provides are insignificant to the repeat bad guys, usually earning them status and peer respect rather than triggering guilt or reconsideration, much less empathy for victims. They're willing to do some jail time, wear a bracelet, play the probationer game, or wait out a protracted court process somebody else pays for anyway to avoid the shame of looking weak.

The injunction deprives named persons - named because of prior activities, not whimsy - from participating in further gang-oriented behavior. No shame in obeying it because it's enforced, not weakness. If they're out of the life and clean, then the restrictions with all the built-in exceptions give them a fresh chance to stay out. It's a means to break the cross-generational loop. Those who want to perpetuate the gang cycle will hate it, of course. But former gang members no longer involved should be glad to see their families safer, their kids facing less temptation, and their community not run by murderous cold-blooded mafiosi and malevolent thugs sending orders from behind porous state prison bars. Agreed that we're in a bad place even to need this, but the rights of criminals can't exceed those of victims, and citizens desiring to live peacefully within the law can't surrender to packs of animals who don't.

On Council Hears Tsunami of Criticism over Gang Injunction

Posted on January 9 at 3:22 p.m.

These are not hearings; they are ventings. The pro-gang element gets to rant and rationalize while the anti-gang group realizes there's little point to subjecting themselves to the same performance yet again. The anti-injunction forces do themselves a great disservice by appearing to intimidate and justify criminal behavior. The injunction is not a complete solution by any means, but it does demonstrate that Santa Barbara has had it with the gangsters and will not surrender the streets to thugs. At this point, if the city backs down and gives the opposition a win by withdrawing the injunction, it will be free rein for sophisticated prison-based mobs like the Mexican Mafia to step up activities. No thank you.

On Council Hears Tsunami of Criticism over Gang Injunction

Posted on December 3 at 1:43 p.m.

I do wish generous souls like Mr. Simmons and Ms. Miller McCune would consider subsidizing a shelter in Montecito for a while. Why not distribute the services - and accompanying problems - more equitably? No doubt there would be many volunteers from Westmont anxious to help closer to campus, maybe to share some dorm space. The fallout from the noble Casa Esperanza experiment - those who are drawn but really don't want sobriety and/or can't handle the structure - ends up living rough on the sidewalks, around the freeway, and in the bushes. Without going into gross details, imagine the consequences given the lack of all-day public toilets, mental illness, criminal histories, and over-abundance of cheap alcohol and drugs. Isn't it about time those pleasures were shared with the green manicured lawn and twelve-foot hedge set that generously enables them from behind gates? How about it, Montecitans? Surely you've got room for a shelter in your neighborhood, too. Maybe by your school? It's real educational for the kids.

On Homeless Shelter Numbers Up

Posted on November 27 at 3:52 p.m.

Diablo Canyon is a devlish wicked problem, for sure. Equally concerning is that the dangerous phase of cleanup at Fukushima Daiichi began last week. It will continue for decades. As Nick points out, we could be seriously impacted if someone goes "oops" - or whatever the Japanese phrase is for "Crap...I just slipped up with this joystick and initiated a nuclear reaction that will contaminate the northern hemisphere so much that Chernobyl looks like an exercise and they have to evacuate California while the cloud passes." Dr. Stephen Hosea of Cottage gave a talk on nuclear risks early in November and it's been uploaded to UTube at

On Diablo Canyon: Mad Dogs and Crazy Chickens

Posted on November 2 at 4:04 p.m.

Just curious to know how many people drove their autos and trucks - some with bikes aboard - down to Cabrillo to celebrate this closure to cars. With the sidewalks, multi-use path, and Chase Palm Park all available, not sure why this gesture was necessary or particularly meaningful. The 4th of July and Farmers' Market close streets to cars, too. So? More mass transit, bike paths, and alternative means of transportation are great. But does blocking a major cross-town artery on a busy Saturday for a few booths that could have been attached to Art Walk really make that point?

On SB Open Streets: ¡Calles Vivas!

Previous | Page 2 of 11 | Next

event calendar sponsored by: