Page 1 of 7
Posted on May 21 at 7:43 p.m.
Yes, it's always the excuse to give the next department head a chance. This is a broken record that has been played again and again over the last 5 years in ADMHS and other County departments, as well. Unfortunately, if history proves correct, the problem is out of Dr. Glenhorn's hands--she's just the next excuse. It is a systemic problem.
Repeating my first post, what happened with the action items presented by consultants less than two years ago and where, oh where, is the CAO's deputy staff in following up on this? Dr. Glenhorn was not an employee two years ago but there are plenty of high paid staffers who are still working for the County who oversaw this, promulgating an expensive department review that produced very few improvements and results.
On ADMHS Again in Financial Trouble?
Posted on May 21 at 7:47 a.m.
I find the decision-making process at the County to be completely confounding. Two expensive consulting firms were hired by the CAO to do a thorough analysis of the problems in ADMHS and they filed their recommendations months ago. Were any of the recommendations implemented? In addition, Dr. Wada oversaw both Public Health and ADMHS, during this period and there were rumors of mergers between the two organizations which apparently has been abandoned without any explanation. There appears to be an extra-ordinary lack of institutional will to make the changes that are necessary to fix the problems in ADMHS. One set of leadership just kicks the can to the next team that is hired.
Posted on March 17 at 6 p.m.
What an interesting thread of comments about the teepee project. IMHO, this really was an uncreative assignment and the reaction was also predictable. A more relevant project would be to build the type of housing we' provide our military personnel--not the officers--in Iraq and Afghanistan. Modern tents. Alternately, create an abode of the Afghani peasants. Better yet, assign a Geodesic dome, where Art, Math, and Physics converge?
On Tempest in a Teepee at SBCC
Posted on November 21 at 8:14 p.m.
It is curious how the so-called keepers of the future have turned out to be interested in their lot in life. I support public education and healthcare. That doesn't equate to the "average" employee at UC being granted employment and health care for life.
The UC is a research institute and let their leaders see it through.
Education and training up the next generation is not the mission of the University of California. As for the well-heeled, that's up to the UC;s administrators. UC is a think tank and we wish them well. Meanwhile, the next generation deserves an education.
On UC Regents Approve Tuition Increase
Posted on November 21 at 12:50 p.m.
The UC system can reduce expenses and increase efficiencies.
The lifestyles also provided to most UC employees, including executives, faculty, and administrators is beyond generous. One obvious place to cut costs is with retiree pensions and with the reduction/elimination of generous health insurance benefits available to non-employees, such as spouses and partners of UC employees, after retirement. Introduce 401K's and eliminate health benefits when employees/partners/spouses are eligible for Medicare. Eliminate free parking permits on campus for retirees!! Why should they have any more right to park for free than those of us who pay taxes to the institution and supporting the necessary infrastructure for them to operate? Accountability for institution and individual effectiveness for individuals working for the UC is also long overdue.
Posted on October 9 at 10:52 a.m.
It’s not often that I see taxpayer issues the same as the Jarvis folks, but in the case of Measure S to fund another SBCC bond, I will vote an unequivocal “no”. In addition, I will never give money to the SBCC Foundation. I overheard one of the Deans say that one could shoot a canon on the SBCC West Campus on Fridays and no one would hear it. Classroom utilization is indeed questionable and if they are inadequate use Foundation and grant money.
SBCC students, like many other colleges and universities nationwide, put an enormous drain on local services such as police/sheriff, streets and roads, infrastructure, neighboring areas, etc., etc. Meanwhile high paid executives and administrators spend a lot of energy plotting how to perpetuate their careers, benefits, and retirement, while providing the absolute minimum instructional workload to run the educational programs and continue to receive state funding.
Local voters will have an opportunity to watch the SBCC Executive team, in action, before the upcoming election, in the annual planning/prevention efforts to reduce the chaos and damage caused by the Isla Vista Halloween bash. Every year, the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors go through a lot of effort to contain this, at yet more expenses to taxpayers, but SBCC executives have been visibly absent from the table.
A sustainable effort over a multi-year period to improve gown and town relationships is clearly needed.
On City College's Sprawling Impact
Posted on September 16 at 8:13 p.m.
Report back on where the mean (mien) high tide line is, discoboy. I assure you it isn't 2/3s of the way up the cliffs. However, facts are facts. Measure it and let the kind readers of the Independent know.
On Student Injured in More Mesa Cave-In
Posted on September 10 at 6:28 p.m.
Correction to my previous post...The access point is South Patterson, which becomes Shoreline. North Patterson would be quite a walk!!
Posted on September 10 at 4:24 p.m.
Anyone walking onto More Mesa from North Patterson is tresspassing on private property. There are two large parcels to get to the caves and both are privately owned. One property is posted with no tresspassing signs every 20 ft or so. They are hard to miss. The bigger property is also privately owned by an out of country (Saudi Arabia?) property investor. With regard to the caves on the ocean bluffs, they may be natural but, but, but... They have been enlarged by people who hang out there. The caves are dug into fragile and tall ocean bluffs and the cliffs are being trashed and disrespected by a lot of people who hang there. Graffiti is everywhere next to the caves, which is clearly visible from the beach. This community is very lucky to have an undeveloped, accessible, natural, open area and people who are technically trespassing on the property need a reminder about what a gift this is and take care of it.
Posted on June 11 at 4:31 p.m.
We've had more than one child go to the Santa Barbara high schools who participated in athletics. Inappropriate behavior occurred then as it does now and there is a lot of peer pressure among these kids not to say anything. It seems to me that all coaches and school district employees should be required to attend mandatory training provided by the school district on how to coach, work with teenagers, and the possible consequences for inappropriate or harassing sexual conduct. At one UC where I worked, this type of training was mandatory and it was also clearly conveyed that the University would not protect employees legally (e.g. Faculty, Graduate Students, Researchers, and Administration) if misconduct with students was reported/revealed. Whether or not the student was about to turn 18 is irrelevant and the law is the law, That said, the coach violated professional standards and is dealing with the consequences.
On S.B. High Softball Coach Arrested for Sex with Student