Page 1 of 192
Posted on March 7 at 3:14 p.m.
Are you aware that on the day before 9/11, 9/10/01, Donald Rumsfeld came out in the media and admitted that $2.3 trillion of the Pentagon budget in the previous few years had been lost and not accounted for?
Are you aware that the very next day the plane that hit the Pentagon struck the budget offices where all of that information was held? Are you aware that many of the very people and documents that could have helped piece together the puzzle of the missing $2.3 trillion was stored in that corner of the building and were killed or destroyed? Did you know that ONE side of the building, out of it's 5 sides, had just recently been 'renovated' to help withstand an airplane or missile flying into the building? Are you aware of how easy it would have been, during that renovation, to place explosives into the walls for the simulated terrorist event?
Can you tell me when a better time would have been to reveal that information about the missing $2.3 trillion? I mean, 9/10/01 would have been optimum, to the day... What reporter on 9/11/01 or 10/11/01 for that matter is going to have the balls to ask serious questions about a missing $2.3 trillion from the Pentagon budget during a national crisis like that?
Are you aware that all of the elevator shafts in WTC 1 and 2 were renovated in the year before 9/11 and that the very weekend before 9/11 the top half of WTC 2 was completely shut down, no electricity? What about the witnesses who talked about all of the noisy construction on the empty floors around where the airplanes hit? They said it sounded like giant dumpsters were being lifted, moved, and then slammed back onto the ground above them. You needed a special key to access those floors.
The thing is, 9/11 truth is a lot more refined than it was in 2005 or whenever the first edition of Loose Change came out. There are at least a half a dozen or a dozen REALLY good 9/11 documentaries and most of them DO NOT overlap with a lot of the same information over and over.. You could literally spend 10-15 hours or more going over new evidence for 9/11 being an inside job and a cover-up. If you don't know that 9/11 was an inside job then you've either been hiding under a rock or you are just lazy.
Here is a short list of films I recommend on the subject:
September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor
Loose Change: Final Cut
Loose Change: An American Coup
9/11: Press for Truth
On Foreign Entanglements
Posted on March 7 at 2:11 p.m.
spacey the BBC report is a youtube video, hopefully the contents will continue to be available here though I cannot verify I'm behind a firewall:
As far as your quote, "'ll admit that I want to believe because I do think our country is capable of doing something like that loon."
Have you looked into Operation Northwoods? It was a document signed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff back during Kennedy's Presidential term shortly before his assassination. It was never signed by the President, who was the only one left needed to sign in order to begin carrying out the plans. The document outlined plans to create fake terror attacks on US soil in order to convince the country to go to war with Cuba. The document was officially declassified in the late 1990s when many documents related to Kennedy were declassified and you can read it at the official NSA archive.
One of the plans was to blow up an airplane over the ocean and say that there were a bunch of college students and people on the plane, but in fact they were going to blow up a drone aircraft over the ocean and the rest would be a complete hoax. That was back in the 60s. 9/11 was Operation Northwoods 2.0.
Posted on March 7 at 2 p.m.
To say this stuff is "secret" is absolutely ridiculous. How is everybody's memory here? Mine is fantastic. All I'm asking is that you remember back 6 or 7 years with me here, ok?
May 22, 2007The CIA has received secret presidential approval to mount a covert "black" operation to destabilize the Iranian government, current and former officials in the intelligence community tell the Blotter on ABCNews.comhttp://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines...
July 7, 2008Late last year, Congress agreed to a request from President Bush to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran, according to current and former military, intelligence, and congressional sources...The covert activities involve support of the minority Ahwazi Arab and Baluchi groups and other dissident organizations. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/20...
27 May 2007The CIA will also be allowed to supply communications equipment which would enable opposition groups in Iran to work together and bypass internet censorship by the clerical regime.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world...
30 Jun 2008President George W Bush requested and received funding of $400 million (£200 million) for the plan after he made a secret appeal to Congressional leaders last year.The money is likely to be used for operations carried out by the CIA and other intelligence agencies, according to the New Yorker magazine.The appeal for funds "was focused on undermining Iran's nuclear ambitions and trying to undermine the government through regime change" said the magazine.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world...
Then in 2009 and 2010 the US media acts like this "Green Revolution" in Iran is totally organic and not Bush/Obama astroturf:
June 22nd, 2009Can protesters ever prevail in a country like Iran?http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/200...
This is a game of connect-the-dots a pre-schooler should be able to figure out here, people.
Posted on March 7 at 1:15 p.m.
I have no idea what you are talking about, the conspiracies I talk about are not secret at all. I wouldn't know about the ones that are secret, that's why they are secret, duh.
There is also a ton of information out there about them. The problem is people still listen to the establishment media and actually believe it when all you have to do is a tiny bit of research to see almost all of it is total crap.
Posted on March 7 at 11:49 a.m.
Yep, DavyBrown is right, "Nothing to see here folks...move along.... (mooooooooooooooo)"
Why don't you read "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" or read about Operation Ajax or Operation Paperclip, you act like conspiracies don't happen and are not documented on a regular basis.. You really have to not be paying attention or be extremely gullible not to see what is going on here.
Posted on March 7 at 8:38 a.m.
And here is something else that is rather disconcerting.. the snipers that were shooting the protesters and police were not controlled by Yanukovich, they were in fact from the new Maiden coalition many of you are supporting!!
Please read more:
Posted on March 7 at 8:05 a.m.
Everybody should read this part one more time, I want you to remember it, because this isn't the last time this will happen. In fact, one day it could happen here.
"Far from a “pro-democracy” uprising, the “Euromaidan” was yet another case of Western engineered regime change leveraging the good intentions of the ill-informed to mask the covert backing of ugly armed extremists, just as it had done all across the similarly engineered “Arab Spring” in 2011."
Posted on March 7 at 8 a.m.
Prepare to get schooled, DrDan and spacey..what you don't realize is you are STILL getting it wrong even after I clearly explained it to you. You still have no clue how propaganda works.
BBC Now Admits: Armed Nazis Led “Revolution” in Kiev, Ukraine
Like the West’s support of sectarian terrorists across the Middle East, including Al Qaeda, it has found the most despicable elements in Ukrainian society to lead “revolution” for the sociopolitical reordering of Eastern Europe. As the dust settles and the West’s proxy regime finds itself safely entrenched in Kiev, Ukraine – the Western media can now finally recuperate some of its lost legitimacy after months of denying the obvious – that armed Neo-Nazis led the so-called “Euromaidan” uprising.
A BBC Newsnight short titled, “Neo-Nazi threat in new Ukraine,” reveals xenophobic Jew-hating nationalists, armed and leading the mobs in Kiev, directly contradicting months of Western media narratives portraying the rabble as aspiring for “freedom,” “democracy,” and “closer ties with the West,” with the most absurd example being the “I am Ukrainian” propaganda reel.
Far from a “pro-democracy” uprising, the “Euromaidan” was yet another case of Western engineered regime change leveraging the good intentions of the ill-informed to mask the covert backing of ugly armed extremists, just as it had done all across the similarly engineered “Arab Spring” in 2011.
READ MORE: http://landdestroyer.blogspot.co.uk/2...
So, you see, it isn't that everybody in Ukraine is a Nazi, it has more to do with the fact that the entire event you witnessed in the media was a staged hallucination of sorts. They pieced together bits and pieces of footage and pushed the narrative they wanted...It's just not how it actually happened. If you follow zappa's advice you'd have a much better idea of what is actually going on.
Posted on March 6 at 4:43 p.m.
"Loon religion has caused far more wars and deaths than any government."-MSSB
Until you realize that Government is a religion..
But actually your statement has some real flaws. The Chinese government killed hundreds of millions of people in the name of communism. Also, governments go to war, not religions. Religion is a tool that government uses to compel the population to support the wars that it starts, it is not the actual reason for war. Sort of like how weapons of mass destruction was the reason our country was led to invade Iraq when it had nothing to do with that. It had to do with war profits and furthering banker control over the region. Therefore we can see that getting rid of religion or weapons of mass destruction won't stop wars, they will just find another excuse.
So why do governments go to war? If you do enough research on the topic, you will find that most if not all wars are funded by banks. If you do more research, you will find that the same banking families fund both sides of the wars. They even decide who wins when they stop loaning money to the country they have decided will lose the war. Both countries go into debt and must repay their war debts and so the banks make a lot of money. You see, for centuries banks have teamed up with various monarchies and government officials to pull the ultimate scam and counterfeit money into existence and then charge the population interest. In fact, that is precisely what our Federal Reserve Bank does today. You will also find that these big banking families happen to own a lot of the industries that manufacture war products, or what we like to call the "military industrial complex". So there are tons of profits to be made by specific individuals in going to war, despite the overt destruction and despair that comes in its wake.
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered...I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." -Thomas Jefferson
On Santa Maria's proposed ICE facility will …
Posted on March 6 at 4:23 p.m.
Botany, if you think about it, a lot of the situations you are outlining that you wish me to deal with would not even be issues in a free society.
Adults having sex with kids - a child can't consent to doing something that they can't physically perform or mentally understand. It is pretty clear that a child can't consent to having sex and having sex with a child is rape. I guess if you want to tie it to my 3 laws of stealing, injury and fraud then convincing a child to have sex would be considered "fraud" and the result a violent act of abuse against the child.
"What about a prostitute with AIDS continuing to ply her trade?" - In a free society you wouldn't pickup hookers on the street, you would be able to go somewhere that has a clean and safe environment where the women are tested. Otherwise you take your chances. With freedom comes responsibility.
"What about a pregnant woman committing suicide?" - This is a ridiculous question. First of all, why not just get an abortion and then commit suicide? Of course people have the freedom to kill themselves, what is the alternative? You put them in prison? You would also be free to try and prevent a person from killing themselves, afterall, I'm not "hurting" them by preventing them from killing themselves so it would not be illegal to do what you have in your power to prevent someone or a loved one from committing suicide.
"What about a heroin dealer selling drugs to kids?" - There is no such thing as a "heroin dealer" in a free society, you would most likely buy drugs at a store that sells drugs. If a store starts selling heroin to kids, then you use your first amendment speech to inform everybody and you get everybody to boycott their store, they go out of business and would probably have to move to a new town or take up a new trade. Now, let's say an unscrupulous person comes into your town and starts selling heroin to kids. The first barrier would be a good education to make sure that your kids don't talk to strangers and don't take strange substances offered to them. If that barrier gets passed, then what do you do in a free society? You use free speech to inform everybody of this unscrupulous person and their activities - you can hire private security to keep them off school grounds and watch your kids as they make their way home from school or bus stops - you can warn the kids of this specific person. Why is this person selling drugs to kids? Are they also selling drugs to adults? Probably not, if the adults can buy them in the store. I don't know how a person would make a living selling drugs to young kids. Now, if by kids you mean older teenagers, they actually have better access to illegal drugs today than they do to alcohol and they have better access to drugs than adults because of the fact that drugs are illegal!!! Once you realize that kids have better access to drugs because of the fact they are illegal, your argument really goes down hill.
Son of James Taylor tours and performs in support of ... Read More
Previous Month | Next Month