Comments by pointssouth

Previous | Page 3 of 24 | Next

Posted on September 2 at 10:56 p.m.

My bad Rob of course you are correct. The cartel growers on national forest land who started the La Brea fire were freedom fighters, the ones who chased the hikers in New Cuyama were stand up people. The guys in Humboldt who locked the 15 year old girl in a box from LA and raped her are of paragons of virtue.

Its all the fault of the government and the laws, not the people in the marijuana trade being sketchy characters. Its not like for $150 for a doctor recommendation I cant grow my own in this state, its the governments fault. If Yosemite burns; its not the growers fault they are the standard bearers of liberty, its the governments how could I be so stupid. Those 50,000 plus Mexicans who died can take comfort in knowing they died so Americans can exercise their god given right to get high and by dying struck a blow against government tyranny. Viva the brilliance of Rob Engenolf!!

Again I support legalization since we are essentially there anyways.

On Illegal Marijuana Grow Discovered on Private Land

Posted on September 1 at 11:56 p.m.

I think it should be legalized, that said Rob - it wouldnt be the continued illegality at fault if it turns out that's what started the fire. It would be the dealer looking to make money in a illegal product. The only real blame if it proves true is with the person who started this.

I don't care if you are offended but your comment is the intellectual equivalent of someone saying a rape victim asked for it due to the way they dressed.

On Illegal Marijuana Grow Discovered on Private Land

Posted on June 29 at 7:40 p.m.

This is great news for the LA/OC County crowd who have moved here and want Santa Barbara to eventually become just like what they left behind.

On Rick Caruso Takes Over Paseo Nuevo

Posted on June 13 at 4:01 p.m.

Nicely written and informative article by CM, thanks for the backstory and knitting it together. I am looking forward to a followup when they release more information.

On Gangbuster or Gangbanger?

Posted on May 31 at 12:31 p.m.


Look for Peter Sperling also, and probably other Apollo corporate names - Sperling son of U of Phoenix founder gave Das $25,000 in just one local race a few years back. I also see him with $3,900 ones recently.

If you want to really have fun check out how much money Apollo has been spending because DoJ and others have been looking at them closer due to the extraordinary high defaults on federal student loans, and their recruiting tactics. Hopefully this bill will be like a Phoenix and burn up before Das pushes it through. You have to wonder how Das with his "education credentials" has as his big donor a guy whose money comes from a "University" that has paid around 90 million dollars in fines from the government in the 12 years or so...

On Williams Defends Controversial Bill

Posted on May 31 at 11:06 a.m.

Das is doing this for one reason, surprised the Independent didn't ask about that. Apollo Group aka University of Phoenix aka Das's biggest contributors. There will be something for them in this you can pretty much guarantee, also worth noting SacBee to the Press Enterprise and lots of papers in between saying this is a bad idea.

On Williams Defends Controversial Bill

Posted on May 31 at 9 a.m.

I wasn't suggesting you buy the daily from she "who must not be spoken of" and her winged monkey Nipper. However Edhat, Santa Maria Times, Lompoc Record, KEYT, KSBY and KCOY/KKFX covered it on their sites.

On Man Threatens Vandenberg Base Guards

Posted on May 31 at 8:18 a.m.

Actually it was reported fairly wide among local media last Friday when it happened. The Indy is just getting to it now, if this is your only forum for local news maybe that's why you are just hearing it a week later. I'm not bashing the Indy they cover a lot of things great and quickly but you miss a lot relying on just one source.

On Man Threatens Vandenberg Base Guards

Posted on May 16 at 12:28 p.m.

I do question the use though of if someone is in prison or going for a extended period why place them on the list and spend money defending the right to list those individuals at this time. That seems to be misguided especially considering the same restriction could be added as a probation term at release.

On Heated Debate Over Gang Injunction

Posted on May 16 at 12:20 p.m.

Ken I realize you like to fall back on reactionary rhetoric in many responses but most of your comments are usually rooted in some sensible points.

Your analogy doesn't really makes sense however since the people named in the injunction have through their own actions which seems to be felonies incorporating violence put them on the list. The TSA restrictions impact everyone who chooses to travel. Apple vs Oranges and all that...

Does society have a right to place some restrictions on people who commit sexual crimes against children? If so why not a gang member with a history of violent felonies? At least the gang member can eventually get off the list if they don't continue to be a a@#$%&e at some point the ways its designed.

On Heated Debate Over Gang Injunction

Previous | Page 3 of 24 | Next

event calendar sponsored by: