Drawing Lines in the Sand

Cops, City Hall at Loggerheads Over New Contract

by Nick Welsh

The bad blood between the Santa Barbara Police Officers
Association (POA) and City Hall over contract negotiations — which
are currently at a standstill — just got a whole lot worse. After a
two-hour meeting at the DoubleTree Hotel, the union membership
voted for the fourth time to reject City Hall’s “best, last, and
final offer.” The night before, the union’s negotiating team and
executive board met for five hours at the Harbor Restaurant,
concluding that a strike was not the way to go either. It is
against the law for police officers to strike. Union president Mike
McGrew — a 20-year veteran of the force — also ruled out any lesser
job actions or work slow-downs. It’s likely, however, that officers
will refuse to respond to certain calls alone in the future and
will wait for backup instead. McGrew also said the union has been
approached by a number of very wealthy, influential citizens who
volunteered to lobby City Hall on the police officers’ behalf.

McGrew acknowledged the city’s offer of 24 percent over three
years was the biggest ever, but said what it gave in increased pay,
it took away in health benefits. He also cautioned that it still
wasn’t enough to prevent the departure of many key, experienced
officers, part of an ongoing exodus that has afflicted the
department over the past several years. Many officers — especially
those commuting from Ventura County — have taken jobs with the
Ventura and Oxnard police departments, where the pay is higher and
the drive to work much shorter.

McGrew and the POA have been holding out for a pay hike of 24.9
percent, and twice in the past six weeks they had good reason to
believe they had secured the fourth City Council vote needed to
prevail over the strong objections of City Administrator Jim
Armstrong and the City Hall bargaining team. As councilmembers went
into a special, behind-closed-doors session last Friday afternoon,
McGrew had assurances that Councilmember Helene Schneider would
deliver the necessary fourth vote. But once inside, Schneider
balked, and the union proposal went down in flames by a 4-3 vote.
About a month before, the same thing happened with Councilmember
Roger Horton. Both Schneider and Horton explained they could have
supported a deal hammered out between McGrew and Councilmember
Brian Barnwell to give individual officers bigger pay raises by
reducing the total number of budgeted officers on the force from
140 to 137. The additional money for the bigger pay hike could also
be obtained by shifting certain police functions — public
information and DARE to name two — from sworn officers to civilian
staff, who cost City Hall less. In other words, Horton and
Schneider were happy to re-slice the pie, but only as long as the
pie stayed the same size. And that, they claimed, did not happen.
Schneider said the union’s proposal would have cost the city’s
general fund $875,000 more than the city’s offer.

Schneider said she was spooked from the deal because City
Attorney Steve Wiley would not allow councilmembers to discuss the
cuts that could and would be made to pay for these raises behind
closed doors. And unless Schneider was certain how and where the
extra money was coming from, she could not vote for the POA’s plan.
Shortly after the meeting concluded, Schneider got a call from a
very angry McGrew, who knew exactly what had transpired and who had
said what in proceedings that by law are supposed to be strictly
confidential. Schneider was upset. Horton was furious, shooting off
an email to City Attorney Wiley demanding to know whether he had to
attend closed session discussions in the future. Mayor Marty Blum
has been quick to accuse Councilmember Iya Falcone, the cops’
strongest ally on the council, of being the source of the leak.
Falcone denied it, stating, “It’s not me. It never was, no matter
how many times Marty says otherwise.”

In the meantime, the cops and City Hall remain hopelessly stuck.
Blum said she’s inclined to extend the city’s offer to the union
one more time; after that, she said, she’d consider imposing the
contract on them. In the meantime, relations between the two sides
have devolved into mutual distrust and contempt, compounded by
personal animosity. From the smallest detail to the largest issue,
neither side can agree on much of anything. About the only point on
which both sides can find common ground is that they’re relieved
that the number of officers on the force is increasing. Currently,
there are 131 sworn officers in the department, which was budgeted
for 150 in 2001 and is now budgeted for 140.

Login

Please note this login is to submit events or press releases. Use this page here to login for your Independent subscription

Not a member? Sign up here.