• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    New Developments


    Thursday, March 8, 2007
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Engaging in not-so-subtle competitive chest-thumping, the City of Santa Barbara’s Redevelopment Agency explained how it repossessed an affordable condominium from an owner who’d twice started methamphetamine-related fires and illegally obtained a loan on the property. The agency will resell the unit for $241,000, well below the market rate of $750,000. The city’s enforcement action stands in contrast to the county’s affordable housing track record. A high-ranking county official recently indicated he’d need a staff of 40 to ensure rule compliance in the county’s 400 affordable units, 25 percent of which are afflicted by fraud. City Hall has enforced compliance in its 361 below-market units with only three people, and pursued action against 24 occupants in the past seven years. “I know the county wishes they were one-tenth as good as you are,” said Councilmember Brian Barnwell to city housing officials.

    Santa Barbara city councilmembers are still steamed at how their proposal to extend Santa Barbara’s “sphere of influence” into Noleta – the unincorporated land between Santa Barbara and Goleta – was shot down at last week’s LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) meeting. After five years of deliberation – and a petition with 4,000 signatures – the fate of this in-between area remains up in the air. If Noleta falls into Santa Barbara’s sphere, it would give Santa Barbara no authority over what happened there but would indicate an interest in eventually annexing the area into the city’s domain. The big player in the melodrama was new 2nd District Supervisor Janet Wolf, who advocated that affected residents vote in an advisory election before Santa Barbara’s sphere of influence was extended. She also charged that those signing in favor of joining Santa Barbara’s sphere were not given the option of voting in favor of the status quo.

    Santa Barbara’s Community Development Director Paul Casey said he expects developer Bill Levy’s foreclosed properties on lower State Street – long slated for a Ritz-Carlton time-share condo complex – to be sold off to one of two private development firms this week. While Casey declined to name the suitors, he said he was confident they had the deep pockets to complete what would be the largest private redevelopment project to hit Santa Barbara in decades. Levy was foreclosed upon in January by Mountain Funding after he defaulted on about $40 million in loans, interest, and late-payment penalty fees. Even in foreclosure, however, Levy has been trying to entice former investors – many unpaid – with schemes to regain interest in the plan.

    For the first time ever, City Hall is allowing a developer to use an electronic elevator lift to provide parking for a condo project at 320 East Victoria Street. The lift will allow the developers to squeeze eight parking spaces into a garage that could otherwise accommodate only four cars, saving 800 square feet of space. Though city traffic planners had their doubts, they approved of the lift because the garage fronts the end of an alleyway, so no traffic will be blocked as cars enter and exit. The lift was the brainchild of garage co-owner Dennis Allen, who visited a San Diego complex utilizing the same arrangement. Architect Dennis Thompson said he was “excited” about the project but acknowledged it would not work for all areas.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    69.1°
    Wind:
    8 W

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    3. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    4. My Swine Flu Experience
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.