• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Courtesy Photo

    Westmont Okayed for Expansion — Once Again

    Court of Appeal Denies Plea by Objecting Montecito Residents


    Saturday, December 6, 2008
    By Chris Meagher (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    A year after a Santa Barbara Superior Court judge rejected a lawsuit from the Concerned Citizens Over Westmont Expansion group, the California Court of Appeal on December 3 denied an appeal by the same group of that decision, which means Westmont College can proceed with plans that will drastically change the landscape of the campus.

    The Westmont Master Plan, already with its first phase underway, will add roughly 345,000 square feet to campus. Opponents were arguing that Westmont had “slapdash analysis” in its final subsequent environmental impact report, and that the FSEIR (Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ) issued in 2006 didn’t meet California Environmental Quality Act standards. They argued this in part because—of the approximately 345,000 square foot expansion project—they said only 145,000 of it has been subjected to environmental review over the 44 years Westmont had been talking about updating its Master Plan.

    But the three-judge panel disagreed. Writes Justice Kenneth Yegan: “Our conclusion is consistent with the trial court’s: ‘Westmont had an approved master plan which it was reasonable to interpret as including approved buildings. Therefore, use of that level of development as the baseline was proper.’”

    The three-judge panel heard arguments from both sides on October 22 in Santa Barbara. The next day, Westmont ceremoniously broke ground on the Adams Center and Winter Hall, and November 12 pulled permits for the two new buildings. The first phase also calls for two additional new facilities — including a chapel and residence hall — to be built in less than three years, with a five-year break before beginning the second phase of construction.

    “Once again, we’ve received unanimous support for the lengthy, comprehensive and costly planning process we pursued to update our Master Plan,” Westmont President Gayle Beebe said in a statement. “We‘ve worked closely with the county and the local community, gathering input that ultimately resulted in a better project for everyone. This decision, like the ones before it, confirms that our project will not adversely affect the neighborhood.”

    The Montecito Planning Commission approved the Master Plan unanimously, while the Board of Supervisors denied the Concerned Citizens appeal. Concerned Citizens was represented by the law firm Cappello and Noel. “We have no comment until we study the opinion and speak with our client,” said attorney Troy Thielemann.

    The college began its latest update to the Master Plan began eight years ago, with several public hearings and much environmental review, finally gaining approval in 2006 with 116 conditions of approval.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Great news. It's about time.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    Ponder (anonymous profile)
    December 6, 2008 at 7:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Time for the "concerned citizens" to get a life. Way past time, actually.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    RCMeltzer (anonymous profile)
    December 7, 2008 at 9:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    I could be wrong, 100% wrong, but I think that law firm is the same 1 that was trying to get the skatepark on the beach from being built. If that's the case, what a bunch of killjoys :) henry

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    hank (anonymous profile)
    December 8, 2008 at 5:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    42.1°
    Wind:
    3 ENE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    3. Teacher in Trouble
    4. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    5. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    6. My Swine Flu Experience
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.